I think the interesting conspiracy now, is why this thread was moved from ATS to AbovePolitics. According to the stickied post by Majic,
"A Political Conspiracy is a plan to violate law for political purposes devised by one or more political figures or groups.
The key to any conspiracy is that it must be illegal. Campaign strategies and oily rhetoric may be unsavory, but unless there is a violation of law or
a suspected violation of law involved, political topics belong on Politics@ATS, not here."
So then I say, well there is apparently nothing illegal about her taking him as an advisor, although she will at one point be getting classified
briefings with him being her foreign policy advisor, which is potentially a legal problem. I have also read that rather than being "one of
thousands" he is actually in her inner circle of advisors. But the real issue, and where the legal part comes in, is that these two (three including
Bill) have very very old connections, and they have broken the law in the past, by stealing and destroying classified information, and that can mean
there is a plan to put him back in place in Washington to continue the cover up.
There was a conspiracy without a doubt, laws were broken, and this was proven beyond a doubt, (which is more than most of these threads do) and it is
very likely to be continuing.
Even right now I go over to that board, and there is some post there about the media demonizing socialist healthcare and whatnot. I asked why that
was a conspiracy, and no response.
Media's Political Conspiracy
The media's stance on socialist healthcare has no legal insinuations, and it is by no means a political conspiracy. Unless you want to say the media
is all on board behind Hillary as their favored candidate to push for it to come to pass.
This web site does not even remotely fairly represent the issues, with a massive left leaning crowd being quick to bash anyone not in league, and this
extends all the way up through the moderators.
Hardly a way to deny ignorance.
TheMesh