TERRORISM: Troops were sent into Iraq without vital chemical kit

The UK government, being certain about the presence of WMD and how much of a threat they posed, troops into Iraq without proper equipment, filters e.t.c. to protect them from any WMD attacks. These must be some super human troops, they must be immune to the "imminent" attack the world was so afraid of. If they were so uninterested in protecting troops from this then maybe it might point to the fact that they didn't really believe their was an imminent threat, or better yet, there weren't any WMD at all.

www.telegraph.co.uk

"Challenger 2 tanks and other armoured vehicles were sent into battle
without the filters they needed to protect them and there was a
"significant shortfall" in the number of detector units used to identify
nerve agents."

www.guardian.co.uk...

"The NAO found that some British tanks and other armoured vehicles in
Iraq were not fitted with filters to protect troops against nuclear,
biological and chemical (NBC) attack."


Along with this news yesterday:

www.atsnn.com...

things are not looking very bright for the liars at the top. Everyday more of their lies are coming to the surface, but yet no action has been taken. Why hasn't Blair been removed from Parliament? Why has Bush not been impeached? These men have lied to their people, and there's one thing I think we can ALL agree on, the invasion of Iraq was nothing to do with liberation. Right?

[Edited on 24-1-2004 by John Nada]

[Edited on 24-1-2004 by SkepticOverlord]

Or they were hoping for big casualties to get everyone to support war actions.

Originally posted by tr
Or they were hoping for big casualties to get everyone to support war actions.

I'm not sure which is more disturbing...

Either way it's bullshit, the lies have got to stop.

No one has any answers for this at all?