David Icke - Nut or Brilliant Researcher, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 6-10-2007 @ 10:43 PM by BStoltman
Welcome all truth seekers. In this discussion I want to try to uncover whether David Icke is just some crazy nut or is he a brilliant researcher. Let’s dig right into this. I have read many of the major conspiracy author’s books, and listened to their lectures. The major ones in my eyes are Jordan Maxwell, Michael Tsarion, Jim Marrs, Fritz Springmeier, Len Horowitz, and of course David Icke.

I was first introduced to some of David Icke’s theories when I ended up coming across a document he wrote sometime ago. It basically covered the Freeman incident, which If you don’t know is about a group of people who declared themselves sovereign from the United States, and did it all while abiding by the laws of the United States. Now I am not going to go into details on how this was done, but if you do a little research on the Freeman incident you will come across some of the details. This document was quite interesting to me, and as I got through this information, eventually he started talking about some of the conspiracy theories revolving around the Freemasons, and many leaders of different countries. Which again I must say was very interesting and there is a lot of evident to support such theories. Shortly after this, Icke came upon the topic that has made him famous or infamous; the idea of a reptilian species on the planet. This is when my ears turned off and my mind said “Ok, you were good up till now. What the heck is this about some sci-fi type creature that has taken over the world or whatever” I must admit I quit reading the document after that, and didn’t really pursue any more of David Icke’s work after this. It was a good couple years before I ever got back to reading David Icke’s material.

A couple of years later; after I had read quite a great deal of material by different authors, in the area of Religion, Conspiracy, Aliens, Paranormal, Freemasonry, Symbology, and many other subjects. I did find a remarkable amount of claims by different people of a reptilian like creature; some even referenced the Grays that everyone has heard of as being reptilian like. Mind you these people are not conspiracy researcher, some say they were just trying to make a buck, and indeed some probably were, but why reptilian, and why so many claims there obviously must be some truth to this. I recommend The Universal Seduction series; it has many different sighting and claims listed that are generally unbiased. Might I also mention that many of the religions have the evil god/being ex. Satan, as being reptilian? What’s this about a serpent in the garden? Some religions even reference a great alligator as the evil one. Perhaps there is more to this after all, maybe Satan isn’t referred to as the great serpent just because he was slippery, perhaps he had an appearance of a reptile. “Now I’m not saying this is absolutely the answer, I am just trying to open your mind up to the possibility of it. I don’t know all the answers but there is some evidence to support this claim.” Perhaps the Nephelium, that are referred to in the beginning of Genesis 6 were reptilian like creatures who knows.

My point is that unless you know all or at least a great deal of the facts, do not throw an idea out. Set it on the back burner, someday you may find it fits. Even so even if David is completely wrong on the reptilian idea, does it matter? That’s like saying that before I went to school I believed that the world was flat, and then later found out that it is in fact round, but because I announced that is was flat early on, now everything I say from this point on is wrong. This is nuts in my opinion. My views 10 years ago are way different from my views now. I would have said you are nuts if anyone came up to me and told me what I know now, and 10 years from now I will have very different views from now. Your perspective of a situation or idea is completely based on the knowledge you have acquired at that moment.


reply posted on 22-4-2008 @ 11:06 AM by Noeticcenter
On 6-10-07 BStoltman wrote on David Icke:

What’s this about a serpent in the garden? .... there is more to this after all, ...
My point is that unless you know all or at least a great deal of the facts, do not throw an idea out. Set it on the back burner, someday you may find it fits. Even so even if David is completely wrong on the reptilian idea, does it matter?
_________

Noetic analysis:

First of all, the 'serpent in the garden' is an ex post facto event. He was a brilliant, erect, talking creature, a species very close to humans, one of a kind. After his deception, he was condemned into the crawling, wriggling serpent.

From: [PB]
Sbject: RE: KJ FORUM N76 Weedon : POTABLE AFTER BOILING
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:48:12 +0000
From: PB medinuclearathotmaildotcom 9-23-04

Comments by PB on KARL JASPERS FORUM N76 *POTABLE AFTER BOILING* by RW, 21 September 2006, posted 23 September 2006

[RW] N76
We are by nature natural before we are by culture cultured.
Our oldest myths rise
from prehistory and
are not to be ignored.

[PB]
The Natural Man conceived-and-born depraved
By no cultured human effort can ever be cured
No subtly devised fables validate Power over Death
Such Majesty only eyewitness account confirmeth

[RW]

Adam and Eve and
two intruders, God and Snake,
are a case in point

[PB]
No crawling wriggling creature was that Eden Serpent
Walked upright, mimicked better than an ape or parrot
A cunning intermediate, no less, betwixt man and beast
The Mighty Fall fell this wily also flat on belly: ingest dust

Who that conscious Intruder into the triune Echad
Of matter, space and time, the wholesome triad
Consciousness, mind and body, Creator’s facsimile?
Fallen Cherub of the Triune Elohim was that Rebel

[RW]
Like ourselves, these myths
are a tad schiz-y, Culture
confounding Nature.

[PB]
Death, corruption and the Solid Law of Entropy
Make devolution evident; no Upturn without Energy
Externally endowed on hapless, hopeless, degeneracy
Of doleful existential tread-mill with no sufficiency

PB, PhD 21 September 2006, posted 23 September 2006

KARL JASPERS FORUM N79 (to N77) POTABLE AFTER BOILING

www.kjf.ca... www.kjf.ca...

www.kjf.ca...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In view of the many recent publications on Dark Matter (GOOGLE for Dark matter, Dark Chemistry, Dark Biology, Invisible Homo Sapiens, Dark Politics..) could it be possible that the the so called Obamania is a Dark Matter phenomenon? It could very well be 'chanelling' on a mass scale (as in SETH/Jane Robert).

Whether astrophysical dark matter or string-theoretical axion exists or not will not be a serious issue as far as the biosphere is concerned. There could be a bio-dark-matter lurking behind sentient processes? Dark Matter atoms may yield, dark chemistries which in turn may lead to dark biology and a an invisible body for every human capable of 'chanelling'.

Empirically a vegetative state is common to all sentience, an animal state is common to animals including humans, but the anthropic state with its MIND is unique to humans only. Experimentally the bio-photon emission from live plant cells is about 10 times more than that of human cells. Animal cells have a rate in between. A differential distribution of bio-dark matter across the taxa may explain the differences in the biophoton emission rates.

Noetic Journal Vol 4 # 4, 351-360, 2003,
[Nobelist Sir John Eccles Centennial Edition].

Dark Chemistry or Psychic Spin Pixel? NeuroQuantology, June 2007, Vol. 5 # 2, 197-204
Dark Matter & Dark Chemistry NeuroQuantology September 2007, Vol 5 # 3, 322-326...

noeticcenter.tripod.com...

noeticcenter.tripod.com...

noeticcenter.tripod.com...
PB, PhD
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


reply posted on 30-5-2008 @ 07:47 AM by mlmijyd
reply to post by BStoltman



David Icke has produced nothing seminal as his 'research'is based on others work i.e. Jordan Maxwell, but he doesn't give Jordan the credit (even thought it was Jordan who brought him over to the US).

David Icke is a good speaker though.


reply posted on 30-5-2008 @ 08:16 AM by nexusmagazine
Originally posted by mlmijyd
reply to
post by BStoltman



David Icke has produced nothing seminal as his 'research'is based on others work i.e. Jordan Maxwell, but he doesn't give Jordan the credit (even thought it was Jordan who brought him over to the US).

David Icke is a good speaker though.



I have posted my experiences with David Icke on another thread, so I will limit my response here to the original thread question, ie is he a nut or a brilliant researcher.

He is certainly NOT a brilliant researcher! He has made some serious errors, which he fails to correct, and he relies way to much on anecdotal information without discernment. In fact, more than one of his inside-key researchers have quit in horror at his readiness to believe in various people's experiences without question.

I don't believe he is a nut, either, any more than anyone else here could be considered a nut. If you believe in consensus reality, then he is a confirmed nutcase, but from my perspective, those believing in consensus reality are equal nutcases.

What David Icke IS good at, is packaging up various pieces of the jigsaw, and presenting HIS take on what it all means. He is an excellent and spellbinding and passionate orator. His sense of conviction in what he says is literally contagious.

At least he believes in his own rave - which is more than I can say for other 'names' in the field. And although I don't agree with all of his rave - he does have my respect for standing up and speaking out for those who DO want to hear it.

Duncan


reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 04:07 PM by kidflash2008
reply to post by buds84



I think some of his ideas of who is running things is interesting. However, I think the whole Reptilian idea is based on our natural repulsion of snakes. (I rather like snakes!) It is interesting to put in a Zecharia Sitchin video on his far out theories. I think most of them get as wild as they can to sell books and DVDs. And no, there is nothing wrong with making a living.



reply posted on 16-7-2008 @ 02:44 AM by 1234567
At the end of the day my take on Icke is simple. He is a brave man to stand up and speak out against the mainstream. His research is well done and very detailed. Yes he uses work from others like Maxwell but also adds to it and tries to evolve it into some sense. I agree the reptilian topic is hard to swallow, but that does not mean we should just laugh and ignore it.

There are some things going on in this world i am sure would make us all freak out if we knew. Icke is just trying his darn best to uncover what this is.

So is he a nut? No i dont believe so.

Is he a brilliant researcher? Yes i would say so.

You have to ask yourselves a question. Just look at the garbage we see on the mainstream. Then listen to these great researchers like Maxwell and Icke. They may not always be 100% right, but they are giving 100% to try to find out the thruth.

Like Maxwell said. Dont listen to those who have found the truth, listen to those who are searching for the truth and the truth will set you free.

And one more thing. Those people who are Anti-Icke, it is IMO that these people just focus on the early days of Icke, failed footy player, Wogan TV show and the reptilian theory. If they gave just a moment of their time to his recent works they would soon realise there is a great amount of information to digest which we would never see in the mainstream.

I say good work David and keep it up.

Oh and has anyone heard about Maxwell recently? I heard he was in some trouble.

Peace.




[edit on 16-7-2008 by 1234567]


reply posted on 25-7-2008 @ 01:48 AM by longtimefriend
I started this type of thread on a local message board here in Ottawa and it was heavily ridiculed...I'm glad to see there's people out there who are open-minded to new subjects!

So to reply to this post...I honestly don't know what to make of the whole reptilian race subject matter--I am on the fence on this one. Part of me sees the reptilian theory as metaphorical for an illustration of evil, the other half entertains the idea of alien races ruling the planet. btw, has anybody seen david icke: lizards and jews?
www.youtube.com... some say that he is really referring to the jews.

I've also thought that David Icke might possibly be using this subject as his way discredit himself to the general masses. He might not want this information to get in the wrong hands, so he is discrediting himself in order to avoid a potential assassination. That's one theory...

could be just complete hogwash to grab our attention as well... his insane views have really helped his marketing hasn't it? if you mention david icke to someone they will (for the most part) associate him with the shapeshifting blood drinking... you know the rest. I find those people haven't really looked deeply enough into his work.

But ya, his work is mixed with good and bad information as a few users have already pointed out. I think he might be doing this on purpose to keep those out who should not know. Conspiracy theorists tend to mix knowledge with nonsense in this fashion I find...
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nibiru Video Explains It All (Conspiracy)
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
Mark Dice calls out Alex Jones
  Posted 7 days ago with 5 member flags
Any radio operator notice very sharp increase in testing the EBS
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
what I think about how bad our wolrd is.
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags
Hollywood finds one more way to shove Nazis up our ... noses!
  Posted 0 days ago with 2 member flags
The spirit of JESUS is here!
  Posted 14 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 108 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 9 hours ago, 88 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies