Anomaly on Mars: weird object

Of course you can see whatever you see, but seeiing nothing out of the ordinary (its mars!) seems a little to easy.
Its indeed very boring to see an artificial feature on mars.

why 2 pictures? guess!

reply to post by Lunica

---

I'm puzzeled, why is it uninteresting to see pics like that? surely anything that could prove that we are not alone is quite exciting isnt it!

I know about the "seeing faces in clouds" rubbish, but you have to admit this does look a little odd.

I've shown this pic to one of my friends who knows nothing about ufos / mars etc ... first thing he said when he saw it was "is that something from google earth" thinking it was some kind of building .... thing was there was no hesitation in his response so he didnt sit there thinking about what it could be, he just said it...

Mr. rus,
Those that haven't pored over
images like these for years
will inevitably see something.

Those of us that have, will see
what it is.

Mountains, dirt, dust and some
debris.

Keep looking.

Regards,
Lex

No not good enough fo me.

The Perspective of your buildings does not look good IMO. It looks like a play of our perception to me.

The perspective should look like this IMO:



[edit on 6-10-2007 by Pjotr]

I guess there can be a differences in the right perspective of the structure. I dont think I am that wrong in my attempt however.

I understand I have to see dust and rocks as Lexion suggests. Well, better to leave that post aside to me. IMO its more ridiculous to say its a rock then to say its artificial But thats only me. Oh wait its not...

[edit on 6-10-2007 by Lunica]

reply to post by Alexander the o.k.

---

The link worked fine for me. The object is definitely there.

I don't have much to add to this thread but having viewed other threads relating to objects and structures on the moon and mars this is definitely the most convincing I've seen. There's definitely structure there, no doubt about that.

anyone notice these????? what are they?
_javascript:icon('')

So they keep telling us.

i'm just wondering what's probably manufactured in this complex... even though we'll never know that we can say at least that the architecture is of human human origin! (at least it appears to me like that) anyway nice find!

Easy prediction: There are so incredibly many anomolies on Mars that, once there are finally manned missions there, the evidence of an ancient civilization will be immediately apparent upon our arrival. AND the evidence of mainly ignorance, but also blatant cover-up of evidence of intelligent life there on the part of the "Man" will be revealed.

I refer to an earlier thread about the huge holes on Mars. If every one of them - roughly 100 meters across and so sheer (and deep, deep, deep) a drop as to have no edges - really are massive cave entrances only, in the least it's evidence of entranceways to something unimaginably huge underground there... My money is on good ol' NASA/the National Security state using Microsoft Paint or the like. Those things look TOO perfect, and there's other very apparent tampering going on. Here's the thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Or here's the original article:

www.planetary.org...



[edit on 6-10-2007 by Lightworth]

heres a thought.................. maybe were looking at something that has been destroyed or something that has crumbled over time. Such as a tower or maybe bridge supports? I am trying to compare to earthly structures which is probably the wrong thing to do.

reply to post by Lunica

---

Wow. You can absolutely see a structure of some sort there, no question. What in the world could that thing be?

Nice work, scepticsRus!

I turned your image over on it's side, from this perspective it looks like a structure that has toppled over, it's legs having buckled as it collapsed.

Not unlike a structure built upon pylons.



Judging from the coherent direction of the streaks/lines pointed out by Pjotr, I would venture to guess it may have fallen in line with the prevailing winds.


Source | Geology of Mars | Aeolian | Wind Mechanics

There's also a good explanation concerning the color differences of the streaks from the same site:
Source | Geology of Mars | Aeolian | Wind Streaks

Or, disappointingly, all these features could simply be Martian yardangs:


Source | Geology of Mars | Aeolian | Aeolian Surfaces

I like to entertain the thought, however, that what we see here is an artificial structure, quite possibly of ancient lineage, that has succumbed to the ever-present winds of the ages.

Internos, amazing find!! Flagged and starred!

I've outlined what I think I perceive to be. More intriguing is the structure on the left of the crater....



Cheers! Keep looking. The truth is out there!!

The left structure looks more like two walls with something in between. You also can see 2 box shaped objects in front of eachother. I think the "device" in between the two walls is more like something you came up with then the "elephant" thing I pointed out earlier.

btw: Dont you see the "pipe" on the right structure? It appears to be not in the same allignment as the main structure.



It could accommodate a drilling machine? Or its the top of a pipe going into the ground?

As longer as I look at it, this is absolute one of the most significant pics of mars.





[edit on 7-10-2007 by Lunica]

[edit on 7-10-2007 by Lunica]

Thank you Mike, i've been waiting for you here
Interesting your find, even the Lunica's one.
What could be those things?

I would like to be a positive as all you guys. I found the treephoto's more conclusive than this.

Could ANYONE just have a look at the perspective. Look at my input ont his. The buildings you draw look like they are standing in a almost 45 degree angle to the surface!

Ok, I have been looking at the perspective again and just accepting for arguments sake that this is a building I concluded that the white surfaces are the sides of the building instead of the top as seen in the drawings of others. I used the circle craterlike form as a reference point.

See my attempts here:



comments?

reply to post by Pjotr

---

Hmmm....You seem to have a very valid point! Heck, what's the angle of incidence we're looking at here? That's the crux of the issue. If you look long enough at all the pictures, the perspective seems right in all of them! Optical illusion?

Cheers!