It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
Yes, they will used the (qty 3) Osprey left after all the other ones were either shot down or crash.
Like the old Seaking that the Canadian Army is still using.
At the conclusion of the hearing by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the chairman, Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-New York, said Osprey production should be halted.
"It’s time to put the Osprey out of its misery and the taxpayers out of their misery," Towns said, endorsing a study that recommended that the Pentagon and Marine Corps buy new helicopters as well as V-22s.
Originally posted by phd12volt
dont look too much into this, the marines are standing by that aircraft. Its a parts issue mostly.
Originally posted by phd12volt
Alot of parts wear down in that climate relitively fast.
Originally posted by phd12volt
read about it online. ughhhh i hate when people who dont have first hand knowledge lay speculations out without understanding the process
Originally posted by phd12volt
dont look too much into this, the marines are standing by that aircraft. Its a parts issue mostly. Alot of parts wear down in that climate relitively fast. Then the time to get the parts, as the gov doesnt want unecessary parts just lingering around. its called the LEAN+ program. read about it online. ughhhh i hate when people who dont have first hand knowledge lay speculations out without understanding the process
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Are you aware every single rib on every single V-22 is unique?
(Due to the bad dimensional fidelity of the composite spar)
How do you quickly repair one of those with your LEAN+ program?
Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
But again our friend "phd12volt" knowns more than me and you combine.
Originally posted by phd12volt
i was commenting on the fact that some aircraft may not be "service ready" because of parts availability, which if you worked for Boeing, you would understand why it takes so long.
Originally posted by phd12volt
How many of you work on/build these things here?? i bet not many.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
If there are parts unique to a specific plane, then maintaining any kind of spares inventory is going to be a nightmare, building them is a nightmare, and adapting tooling for every aircraft is a nightmare.
The EAPS system is one of the main culprits for the V-22's poor reliability record in Iraq. A new report by the Government Accountability Office criticises the tilrotor for its cost per flight hour and continued operational limitations in certain combat situations.
The GAO report recommended that the Department of Defense consider buying more helicopters and fewer tiltrotors due to the V-22's operating costs.
Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
Other parts are not meant to be "Interchangeable" and some shimming or tapered shim might be required in order to install that part.
You don't really adapt the tooling to produce different part, you try to produce the same part (within a tolerance band) and play with shims afterward.
Bart Kesselring: Tourist trips coming to Afghanistan. We flew around aimlessly in Irag in V-22s avoiding enemy contact, which was fine with me. The orders were to keep the Osprey otherwise known as the Albatross off the front page. Even at that we ere terrified every time we landed as we were forced to stay inside as the brown out created by the props because (you have to be powered all the way to the ground) was really a sand storm. At that point you are extremely vulnerable to an infrared seeking RPG. It is difficult to tell where the Marines end and Boeing begins. It is the plan of every officer involved to get a 6 figure job with Boeing when they retire, to qualify you have to play ball. Mean while us grunts get joy rides.
... In mountain operations at high density altitudes, both the MV-22 and CV-22 have little or no capability above 8000 feet, density altitudes that are common and tactically relevant in the Afghanistan Theater of operations.
Clearly, and except for very few, carefully selected missions, the V-22 is not up to the job it was designed for. There are too many things wrong with it to hope it can be fixed. As it has already cost $29 billion, it would be very wasteful to cancel the program, but what else to do? Pretend its shortcomings and faults don’t exist and then express surprise and regrets when the next crash kills all aboard? Or when one is shot down as it lands in a combat zone?
Compared to the flood of money lavished on the banking and mortgage systems, the Osprey’s $29 billion are just a rounding error. It’s time to admit the V-22 is a challenge that hasn’t worked out, and move on to other technologies that will provide fast, efficient and affordable medium lift.
regrets when the next crash kills all aboard?
Or when one is shot down as it lands in a combat zone?
Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
Bart Kesselring: Even at that we ere terrified every time we landed as we were forced to stay inside as the brown out created by the props because (you have to be powered all the way to the ground) was really a sand storm.
At that point you are extremely vulnerable to an infrared seeking RPG.
It is difficult to tell where the Marines end and Boeing begins.
It is the plan of every officer involved to get a 6 figure job with Boeing when they retire, to qualify you have to play ball. Mean while us grunts get joy rides.
Now from someone who study and analyze the V22 for year, someone who has "first hand knowledge", even more insight:
... In mountain operations at high density altitudes, both the MV-22 and CV-22 have little or no capability above 8000 feet, density altitudes that are common and tactically relevant in the Afghanistan Theater of operations.
So you have an helicopter limited to 8000 ft in an area where mountains reach 12000 ft. This will not be the "milk run" of Iraq.
Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
Since you cannot fool everybody all the time, Rotor & Wing editorial is asking for the cancellation of the V-22:
V-22 It's time to move on:
Clearly, and except for very few, carefully selected missions, the V-22 is not up to the job it was designed for. There are too many things wrong with it to hope it can be fixed. As it has already cost $29 billion, it would be very wasteful to cancel the program, but what else to do? Pretend its shortcomings and faults don’t exist and then express surprise and regrets when the next crash kills all aboard? Or when one is shot down as it lands in a combat zone?
It’s time to admit the V-22 is a challenge that hasn’t worked out, and move on to other technologies that will provide fast, efficient and affordable medium lift.
The V-22 didn’t face heavy combat conditions in Iraq.