Free Energy and Its Implications for a Money-Based Society, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 4-10-2007 @ 02:13 PM by Amaterasu
Though I posted this in another thread, I figured it would serve best to be put into its own thread - more people will look and see, I figure, in a new thread than on page 16 of an old thread. [grin]

For a very long time I have understood that we have an error in our understanding of how energy works - and only recently has Dark Energy and Dark Matter shown up in the calculations of the Universal flow of things.

Wilhelm Reich, Royal Rife, Nicola Tesla, Viktor Schauberger, and "Joe X" (Google the "Joe Cell), amongst many, have shown unexplained things about the Universe. The Powers that Be (Petro-Oil, Pharmaceuticals, the Medical Establishment) all have taken steps to quash the information these pioneers tried and are trying to show the world.

And between our ability to transmute matter (at an enormous expenditure of energy) combined with robotics, bio-cyber integration, and other technologies, free energy could remove us from a money-based economy. For in the final analysis, it is energy in some form which is the base for any money exchange.

I offer a video pod I created for an inventor I know and suggest that you might be interested in watching. Here's the link:

www.youtube.com...

Also, I have a blog on MySpace I think would be worth the read - it is actually a story I wrote, but its implications are far-reaching. It addresses what might happen if we all got free energy and is called, "Dark Energy: A Future Historical Retrospective."

Find it here:

blog.myspace.com...

Thank you to all who take the time to review these pieces.


reply posted on 4-10-2007 @ 09:16 PM by admriker444
Not to sidetrack this thread but I have a post I started about the money system we're enslaved by.

I agree that money and energy are tied together. Get free energy to the people and money might just go away.

I call it the replicator economy...think Star Trek.

Anyway the post I started made me rather upset. I as surprised and stunned over so many negative posts in response. How could anyone possibly think a money-based capitalistic system which promotes greed, crime, environmental rape, and worse is possibly a good / necessary thing ???

www.abovetopsecret.com...

The elite who control these black op technologies will gladly watch the world destroy itself fighting over oil. They will never give it up. And when the last drop of oil is burned, they want to switch us over to biofuels or hyrdrogen or anything else that will still require a trip to a fuel station for our cars and a power line connected to our house.

Its about control. These men have all the money they can possibly ever need. Hell, most of them have the power to print their own money via their control of central banks. These people simply are power-hungry control freaks. And like other despots in the past, they think their blood is better than ours. They think they are smarter and know better than we do.

They are the ultimate evil.



reply posted on 5-10-2007 @ 02:50 PM by admriker444
reply to post by NRen2k5



thats a completely ridiculous comparison nren.

most people cant afford solar panels for one. And those that might be able to spend $30,000 to refit their home will also find the batteries the solar panels store energy in need eventual replacement.

many people live in places where solar power wont work. Where I live for example, its cloudy and snowy 3 months a year.

Solar power rarely can provide folks with enough power to live off the grid unless they live somewhere like arizona that has sunshine 300+ days a year.

Thats a far cry from the free energy device that fits easily on a coffee table. And since it has no moving parts and doesnt produce heat, it will never ever wear out. It will therefore be ultimately cheaper.

free energy devices wont care if its sunny out. every single person on the planet will have use for one.


reply posted on 5-10-2007 @ 03:49 PM by admriker444
reply to post by UofCinLA



first off the fed's stock is private not public shares. They can never be sold. The original owners, those sleazy fellas that met in secret on Jeckyl Island back in 1912 will forever be the only owners.

The regional banks of the fed are controlled by the NY Fed bank ultimately. And it's owners get 100% of all federal income tax collected to pay the ridiculous debt we owe. See Grace Commission for proof.

I wonder how people would feel if they knew that information. Would they so willingly and foolishly happy to pay taxes knowing it went into private hands ?

As long as we have money there will be people like the rockefellers that will exploit others for power and profit.

Money allows an oil-based system to exist. Telsa long ago found away to get free energy into homes. When JP Morgan realized there would be no way to put a meter on the device he quickly pulled his support. We dont have oil because its the best system, we have it because those in charge have control of it.

Look at the medical field. Ever wonder why there are plenty of medicines to let people live with diabetes, aids, cancer, etc but ZERO cures ? There is no money in the cure.

Money goes away and oil will follow. Who in their right mind is going to burn dinosaur sludge when there are so many more healthier options



reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 04:27 AM by admriker444
reply to post by UofCinLA



absolutely positive. You can buy bonds and cd's from the fed. They might offer other investment options like money market accounts, etc. But you will never be able to purchase stocks for fed ownership. It simply isnt possible.

The Fed since its start in 1913 has always been a private shareholder company. I believe theyre a registered corporation in Delaware.

The complete ownership is unknown. A few researchers managed to get some names. The stock is held by families such as the rockefellers, rothschilds, Goldman-Sach, and a few other prominent families. Its thought that roughly 13 families have ownership stock in the Fed.

They would never allow public trading for two reasons. It prevents them from being exposed to a takeover bid. And the big reason...the Fed was designed to appear like a federal branch of the govt, hence the name. It was designed to look to the public as a neutral bank under the control of the govt. Of course its none of those things and ultimately is responsible only to its owners.

And its completely illegal. The Constitution specifically demands that only conngress shall print money and that it be backed by gold or silver. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional.


reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 07:23 AM by NRen2k5
Originally posted by admriker444
reply to
post by NRen2k5



thats a completely ridiculous comparison nren.

Not at all.


most people cant afford solar panels for one. And those that might be able to spend $30,000 to refit their home will also find the batteries the solar panels store energy in need eventual replacement.

many people live in places where solar power wont work. Where I live for example, its cloudy and snowy 3 months a year.

Solar power rarely can provide folks with enough power to live off the grid unless they live somewhere like arizona that has sunshine 300+ days a year.

Exactly. And almost exactly what I said through my comparison.


Thats a far cry from the free energy device that fits easily on a coffee table.

Which doesn’t exist.


And since it has no moving parts and doesnt produce heat

Nonsense. Something need not have moving parts to create unwanted heat. Take computer processors for example.


it will never ever wear out. It will therefore be ultimately cheaper.

Of course, because it exists only in your imagination.


free energy devices wont care if its sunny out. every single person on the planet will have use for one.

Only in your imagination.

Hey, I could imagine an ideal solar panel, couldn’t I? That’d be nice.


Originally posted by UofCinLA
The devices will still need to be built, transported, sold and maintained - just like solar today, and those things have a cost just as the oil does.

Bingo.


Originally posted by admriker444
As long as we have money there will be people like the rockefellers that will exploit others for power and profit.

We’ll have them even when we don’t have money anymore.


Money allows an oil-based system to exist. Telsa long ago found away to get free energy into homes.

Actually towards the end of his life, most of Tesla’s inventions were unworkable and fantastic.


When JP Morgan realized there would be no way to put a meter on the device he quickly pulled his support.

No, Morgan supported Tesla in the first place for experiments in radio, to the tune of $150,000. This was in 1900. When Wardenclyffe Tower was still not complete in 1903 and Tesla had begun speaking very specifically about transmission of “free” energy, Morgan decided he wanted nothing to do with it.


We dont have oil because its the best system, we have it because those in charge have control of it.

Last I checked, oil is controlled by corporations and foreign governments, not the U.S. government.


Look at the medical field. Ever wonder why there are plenty of medicines to let people live with diabetes, aids, cancer, etc but ZERO cures ? There is no money in the cure.

No, there are no cures to those diseases because aside from AIDS, they are not viral. They aren’t the result of an attack on the body which can be fended off. They’re the result of the body itself malfunctioning. And with such diseases you can’t always get rid of the disease, but you can treat its effects.


Money goes away and oil will follow. Who in their right mind is going to burn dinosaur sludge when there are so many more healthier options

Oil didn’t come from dinosaurs.…


reply posted on 8-10-2007 @ 04:41 PM by TheDudeAbides
Originally posted by NRen2k5
And to TheDudeAbides:
Oil came mostly from algae and plankton. If you really were just kidding around, then I'm sorry to have spoilt it.


Doesn't look like we can be friends with you going around spoiling all my fun.

Oops almost forgot...Interesting
articleshowing how much "prehistoric" material was required to produce that petrol well all love soooo much.

A staggering 98 tons of prehistoric, buried plant material – that's 196,000 pounds – is required to produce each gallon of gasoline we burn in our cars, SUVs, trucks and other vehicles, according to a study conducted at the University of Utah.


[edit on 8-10-2007 by TheDudeAbides]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 17 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags