It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Demolition truck next to wtc,Disprove No-Planes Theory also!

page: 7
5
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2007 @ 10:03 PM
link   
Me thinks CAT Scans are in order.



posted on Oct, 10 2007 @ 02:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by talisman
BTW the NO PLANE theory is solidly *DEBUNKED* here---


But where are the FBI and NTSB reports that tell us what planse hit the buildings and what happened to the parts?



[edit on 10-10-2007 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Oct, 10 2007 @ 04:24 PM
link   
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 


which means?



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by zakd619
which means?


Well without the FBI and NTSB reports we have not actual facts of what happened that day. Since they are the main investigating agencies.

We have no official reports that match any of the parts found to any of the 9/11 aircraft.

We have no reports of where the parts found were taken.

We have no reports of any reconstruction of these parts were done as part of the investigations.



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by zakd619
which means?


Well without the FBI and NTSB reports we have not actual facts of what happened that day. Since they are the main investigating agencies.

We have no official reports that match any of the parts found to any of the 9/11 aircraft.

We have no reports of where the parts found were taken.

We have no reports of any reconstruction of these parts were done as part of the investigations.


So youre willing to believe the very same people that lied to you? How pathetic.

If you havent noticed, these investigation agencies are a part of the government. They were told to say it was osama bin-ladin.

There is no parts from the planes cause a demolition cleanup crew was there to clean it up. Notice the bunches of demolition trucks. This was done without reporting it.



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by shiman
So youre willing to believe the very same people that lied to you? How pathetic.


I look at any of these reports the way i look at the official story, if i see something wrong and it cannot be verified then i have to research it and see if i can find other facts and evidence to support it.

I never stated the governemnt lied, i am looking for the truth of what happened that day.

[edit on 11-10-2007 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by shiman
So youre willing to believe the very same people that lied to you? How pathetic.


I look at any of these reports the way i look at the official story, if i see something wrong and it cannot be verified then i have to research it and see if i can find other facts and evidence to support it.

I never stated the governemnt lied, i am looking for the truth of what happened that day.

[edit on 11-10-2007 by ULTIMA1]


But the plaace you want to look is the government agencies?



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by shiman
But the plaace you want to look is the government agencies?


Becasue these agencies are the lead investigating agencies.

I think i would beleive them more then NIST and FEMA.



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by shiman
But the plaace you want to look is the government agencies?


Becasue these agencies are the lead investigating agencies.

I think i would beleive them more then NIST and FEMA.



I feel like im repeating myself. Again.

You trust government agencies over reason. In fact reason should be telling you not to even look at the government agencies for info



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by shiman

I feel like im repeating myself. Again.

You trust government agencies over reason. In fact reason should be telling you not to even look at the government agencies for info


No, i trust my education, experience and common sense. Then also do a lot of research.



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by shiman

I feel like im repeating myself. Again.

You trust government agencies over reason. In fact reason should be telling you not to even look at the government agencies for info


No, i trust my education, experience and common sense. Then also do a lot of research.



So your education, experience, and common sense say trust the liers?

Also whos side are you on. Planes or no planes?



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by shiman
So your education, experience, and common sense say trust the liers?

Also whos side are you on. Planes or no planes?


It has not been proven that they are liers. (yet)

We do not have all the reports from the debris and parts found what planes they are from. Thats why i do research.


[edit on 11-10-2007 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 06:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by shiman
So your education, experience, and common sense say trust the liers?

Also whos side are you on. Planes or no planes?


It has not been proven that they are liers. (yet)

We do not have all the reports from the debris and parts found what planes they are from. Thats why i do research.


[edit on 11-10-2007 by ULTIMA1]


Thats where youre wrong. Theyve already been proven liars.
Example. They say a private jet flew into the pentagon, when it was clearly a missle.

Your not going to find reports. They either got rid of them, or theyr not going to release them.



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 07:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by shiman
Thats where youre wrong. Theyve already been proven liars.
Example. They say a private jet flew into the pentagon, when it was clearly a missle.

Your not going to find reports. They either got rid of them, or theyr not going to release them.


Do you have any evidence to prove it was a missile?

Well maybe, but i keep looking.



posted on Oct, 11 2007 @ 11:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by shiman
Thats where youre wrong. Theyve already been proven liars.
Example. They say a private jet flew into the pentagon, when it was clearly a missle.

Your not going to find reports. They either got rid of them, or theyr not going to release them.


Do you have any evidence to prove it was a missile?

Well maybe, but i keep looking.



Yes. I have plenty of evidence.

When i said "them" i ment the government agencies, just so yo know.



posted on Oct, 12 2007 @ 01:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by shiman

Yes. I have plenty of evidence.


Can i see your evidence that it was a missile?



posted on Oct, 14 2007 @ 07:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by shiman

Yes. I have plenty of evidence.


Can i see your evidence that it was a missile?


Heres some evidence it wasnt a plane

go to pentagonstrike.co.uk

ill search for the video footage from the pentagon security camera. and the building after the hit, before the collapse.

[edit on 14-10-2007 by shiman]

[edit on 14-10-2007 by shiman]



posted on Oct, 27 2007 @ 12:54 PM
link   
can you just post some links.



posted on Oct, 27 2007 @ 04:15 PM
link   
www.pentagonstrike.co.uk


Also just search google.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join