It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Saurus
In Hinduism, the various Gods are understood to be simply different manifestations of a single supreme being, yet Christians call them polytheistic.
In Christianity, the trinity is understood to be simply three different manifestations of a single supreme being, yet Christians call it monotheistic.
Are Christians living by dual standards?
"How seldom we weigh our neighbor with the same balance as ourselves."
-Thomas A Kempis
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by agoodshot
you can't explain the doctrine correctly, it's nonsensical in nature
1=1
3=1
1=3
that doesn't make sense!
especially since characters 2 and 3 only appeared about 2/3rds of the way into the story..
Originally posted by griffinox
2 in 1 shampoo doesn't make sense by that logic either. Consider this...look at your cell phone. Does it have a main piece, a battery, and a battery cover? Are they not THREE pieces that form ONE thing? Is it not possible that the J-man, God, (being the main part of the phone,) and the Holy Spirit form ONE being, God Proper?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Safandjaro
The Spiritual part of Jesus never died. Jesus would not have lived as long as he did if he were not also God. What I mean is if he was running on nothing but pure humanity, when the weight of the sins of the world were placed on him, he would have been instantly crushed. Peter says that while Jesus' mortal body lie dead, he was in the netherworld preaching to the departed people who had not the opportunity to listen to him in person. When the Father said that it was time to rise, the Son reanimated his broken body and came back into our world.
I am sure the normal human thoughts of Jesus died with the rest of the human nature of Jesus. The god aspect of the person, which we do not have and only Jesus had, continued on.
Originally posted by miriam0566
eccls says that the dead are conscience of nothing at all. and psalms says that the thoughts of the dead do perish. so obviously there is more to that passage in peter than you think.
but saurus is right, if jesus didnt completely die, then how was the ransom payed?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Saurus
I guess I should have been more specific. Jesus died to the same extent that any other person dies.
The god-nature of Jesus did not die. We can not understand exactly what he was doing. Peter had a close relationship with Jesus and seems to have had some information that no one else has been able to pass down to us today.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
I am sure the normal human thoughts of Jesus died with the rest of the human nature of Jesus. The god aspect of the person, which we do not have and only Jesus had, continued on.
I agree there was more going on in the story than is explained. I do not think there is a literal Greek type Hell where all the dead people are sitting around holding conversations about religion, and Jesus ambles over and says,"By the way, I just died for your sins." Something more had to happen and it may have involved The Word, that survived the death of Jesus, bringing people to life in some unseen location and giveing them the news of the old promise being fulfilled.
i didn't want to have to get into it, but i see its needed. im using the new american standard because "quicken" is not a world that english uses much today.
1 peter 3:18 For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit;
The first commandment is simple in its wording; there can be no other explanations for what is said or what it means. Yet modern Christianity does not practice monotheism in a pure form. Christianity teaches and preaches the Trinity The belief that the Father[1] the Son[2] and the Holy Spirit[3] are of one God.
This too me is incorrect and a direct violation of the first commandment.
16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16 [KJV]
This is a direct violation of the first commandment. A contradiction.
The Father and Son are clearly separate beings. The Father meaning The God as in You shall have NO other Gods before ME. Then We have the Son of God, that said
"Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God; trust also in me.” John 14:1 [KJV]
"If you love me, you will obey what I command.” John 14:15 [KJV]
Again they are separate beings. Separate Gods
The first commandment is simple in its wording; there can be no other explanations for what is said or what it means. Yet modern Christianity does not practice monotheism in a pure form. Christianity teaches and preaches the Trinity The belief that the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit are of one God.
This too me is incorrect and a direct violation of the first commandment.
hace 1 año
Detalles adicionales
16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16 [KJV]
This is a direct violation of the first commandment. A contradiction.
The Father and Son are clearly separate beings. The Father meaning The God as in You shall have NO other Gods before ME. Then We have the Son of God, that said
"Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God; trust also in me.” John 14:1
"If you love me, you will obey what I command.” John 14:15
Again they are separate beings. Separate Gods
Originally posted by jmdewey60
Apparently there were some Christians who did not believe in the literal incarnation, and I do not think it has anything to do with what went on while he was dead.