It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Could 911 have been accomplished another way? Maybe"
Is it not logical that the Pentagon, probably one of the most secure facilities in the world, would have clear video evidence of a Boeing striking it?
Is it not logical that NORAD should have done something?
Is it not logical that the U.S administration, which lied to get into Iraq, may have lied about 9-11?
Is it not logical to investigate?
Although I can agree with the logic the OP states, from my own investigations the evidence suggests it was more complicated than that. With others having provided the OP with some counter arguments, all he is now trying to do is whitewash the affair with falsehoods and rhetoric to the point that no-one bothers replying and he has the last word (and some might therefore think he's won the argument). TBH, I don't think most people are even baited by him and I'm only responding as I feel the balance must be redressed.
A lot of what the OP says is contradictory to many things about 9/11 I have come across via this site & ther sources and these have not been refuted e.g. "But you see, it was hit 'well.' Those towers weren't built for those sort of impacts. Deliberate, throttle up kamikaze runs like that? The structures were 110 stories on top of it all. That's a tremendous impact thrown at them both." - I refer him to 911blogger.com... the Architects & Enigineers 9.11 Truth organisation's view on the matter. Yes they were designed to withstand jets crashing into them at high speed. And if the planes were so fast, would you not expect the aluminium nose to be a bit crumpled by the time it came out the other side??
I could go on pointing things out about his thread that I think are misdirections but I've made one point, the others have been made many times here on ATS. As I say, I just wanted to redress the balance, I don't wish to get involved in the topic any further, so OP, there's no need to give me a breakdown of my thread in reply (I know what you're trying to do and I ain't playing).
OP, you are ignoring vast amounts of discussion on a multitude of threads in the ATS forums.
No-one can force you to do your homework, but when you dismiss so many arguments is such a slipshod way, while minimizing the conduct of a very deceitful administration, an administration who could not meet the standard in court of a reliable witness on anything, you put people in the position of not being able to take you seriously.
Do you believe that flight 77 did in fact impact the Pentagon? If not, elaborate as to why you don't simple as that.
Google Video Link