It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chorlton
Well to be honest I would agree with Iran on this one.
The US has in the past and is using at present, terrorist activities.
Surely thats obvious?.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Can you cite some examples where the US(policy, not a case where an individual or small number of individuals acted on their own) deliberately targets civilians/non-combatants, for the purpose of striking terror and intimidation into them? And these need to be verifiable examples, not hearsay/conjecture.
Originally posted by psperos
Iran may have armed Iraqi insurgents to try and fend of the American Troops, but did Iran actually pull the triggers? If the American Troops had not been fended off how do we know if that may have saved lives or not in the long run?
When the Iran armed Iraq were they the ones pulling the triggers in the US/Iraq war? No. They would have waged war no matter what, and probably would have gotten weapons elsewhere if not from Iran. The Western world just loves to use the Terrorism and Israel as a scapegoat to all their own messed up problems between themselves.
Originally posted by neformore
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Can you cite some examples where the US(policy, not a case where an individual or small number of individuals acted on their own) deliberately targets civilians/non-combatants, for the purpose of striking terror and intimidation into them? And these need to be verifiable examples, not hearsay/conjecture.
Hmm.
Bay of Pigs.
Operation Pheonix in Vietnam.
The Chilean Coup in 1973 that bough Pinochet to power.
Hows about 'dem apples?
Originally posted by BlueRaja
reply to post by mr-lizard
With regards to Hirsohima/Nagasaki, do you feel that the loss of life that would have resulted from a ground invasion of Japan would've been better? It's estimated that the number of fatalities in that eventuality could've been in the millions, with several hundred thousand being Allied forces. Given that choice, dropping the bomb saved far more lives, and caused far less damage than the alternative. War by its very nature is an ugly business, and unpleasant. Sometime one has to make very tough decisions, and in this case the decision was to not prolong the war and add countless more casualties to the tally.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Bay of Pigs-(unsuccessful operation by Cuban exiles to overthrow Fidel Castro's communist regime)
Phoenix Program-(intent to infiltrate, capture, or assassinate Viet Cong leadership/command and control)
Chilean Coup- (another operation to overthrow a communist regime)- I don't really think you can say even in this situation, that the US policy was to deliberately target innocent civilians. If anything, Pinochet was behind whatever went down in Chile, not the US policy.
None of these examples are of the US targeting ordinary civilians, for the purpose of terrorizing/initimidating them.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
Alright I have had enough of the rude comments on here about the U.S.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
You need to study some more. Who else tends to enemy wounded?
Originally posted by Sky watcher
The C.I.A don't go around blowing up innocent woman and children, Not on purpose anyway though accidents happen.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
Most American service men a women are just doing their job and trying to keep their butts alive.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
You Brits annoy the hell out of me sometimes.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
The British ran the Muslim brotherhood for quite some time
Originally posted by Sky watcher
and now are getting more attacks than the U.S.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
I guess when the real Terrorist hit you over there real hard you will blame it on us too not because you are at war with Islamic terrorist or anything or anything.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
If you want to down the U.S. and say we are the terrorist, Go to Afghanistan or Iraq for a few months and live what you feel.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
The only way to fight terrorist is to beat them at their own game. They kill 10 we kill 100.
Originally posted by Dallas
Iran must know any direct attempt to make war with the USA would be stupid at best. The power difference is too great I would think.
If Iran were allowed to develop nuclear weapons under the guise of domestic energy needs, well then I think that would change everything in that would open the door to under the table delivery -- terrorist stuff.
Proof of the weapons origin may not be available. If that was the case there are many countries at risk of retaliatory measures.
Iran's internal effort to label the US -- CIA and Army as terrorist organizations
must have some other consequence -- internationally, than the Internal label alone. It almost seems silly on the surface.
Dallas
Originally posted by psperos
This form is littered with ridiculous comments.
The CIA may have armed Afghanistan to try and fend of the soviets, but did the CIA actually pull the triggers?
If the soviets had not been fended off how do we know if that may have saved lives or not in the long run?
When the US and CIA armed Iraq were they the ones pulling the triggers in the iraq iran war?
No. They would have waged war no matter what, and probably would have gotten weapons elsewhere if not from the US.
The Arab world just loves to use the US and Israel as a scapegoat to all their own messed up problems between themselves.
Finally: Hiroshima was justified in my opinion because it ended the war, saved lives in the long run
causing a long term peaceful partnership between Japan and the US that has benefited the western world greatly through economics technology and human innovation.
If it weren’t for the US we wouldn’t even have the means to converse on a board through the internet like this.
What are all the alternative opposite outcomes of events if you nullify all the actions of the US? I think most of you here would find it surprising.