thx, will check it out.
"Three things cannot be hidden:
the sun, the moon & the truth"
I like this one better:
Neither the sun nor death can be looked at steadily
Francois de La Rochefoucauld
How come the PAX TV
and the GAMMA PRESS
show a similar winglet-cigar?
why the CONSISTENT
(i.e. pod in many vids/stills, vanishing wing) weird fakes?
IMO: necessity!! . because of either
#1 video-model (they used the same preprogrammed faulty airplane rendering, needed to cover-up the nose out of the live video by inserting a nose-out
into other vids too)
#2 thats what the camera saw (hologram, shiny from the right angle Hez, black from the side)
the other possibility can be excluded:
#3 real, moving-pod-modified-instant-wing-loss 767 plane
Please people. What is your vote? #1 or #2 or #3? And why?
I think WTC1 and WTC 2 were hit by the same gizmo
and I think the last eyewitness here:
has seen A WEIRD PLANE. Could he have mistaken a cruise missile for a plane?
He says: TWO ENGINES. (2 engines ON THE TAIL, like BBC witness, Howard Stern MD90 witness)
I still think the
Teledyne Ryan ZBQM-111A Model 258 Firebrand target
good real-world match for
"I HAVE NEVER SEEN AN AIRPLANE LIKE THAT"...
It is too weird to be explained by more weirdness. I feel the cause of it is rooted in a design that we either don't know or dare not factor in.
You see, in scenario #1 there were a few video-fakers who went through all the confiscated image-sources and
- had to rush some vids/pictures out for fast media consumption
- trickle out more videos over time
- even stay on stand-by?
So there lives (to this day?) a team of Video-fakers TOP SECRET who know that they are not really allowed to live because they are just too much of a
... there would have been more videos that showed explosion but noplane/missile..... private, normal people that RIGHT NOW sit at home with nagging
thoughts: "The FBI took my camera. When I instant-replayed it on the day (before I gave my camera to the agents) I clearly had caught the WTC2
south face and recorded an explosion! It showed this weird aircraft!! (or "it showed NO AIRCRAFT"). Now I had my footage and camera returned and
there is this thing I never recorded! They threatened me and the life of my children! I have to be quiet. I got loads of cash. But it is unjust, an
enormous war-crime has been committed, and now I am a co-conspirator. But if I go public they kill me."
All kinds of phantasies.
And there are people who planted the "plane debris ejector mechanism" in the WTC.
Has anyone traced the trajectory of the ejected debris and appoximated the landing-area? On the
photo (click-enlarge!) it can be seen nicely amongst the buildings.
And WHAT THE @#$%& is the flash in the sky in the Thom photo? Since it is still hi-bright 1 second after the "impact" .. are we looking at the
"projector"? Or the laser/maser that burned the cookie-cutter-plane-impact-shape?