It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Since 1998 I have publicly warned of Russia’s war preparations. The idea of preparing for nuclear war is absurd for most Americans, because the idea of nuclear war makes no sense in a consumer society. However that may be, Russia’s war preparations were as undeniable then as they are today. And Russia is not a consumer society. In the late 1990s Russia was refurbishing huge nuclear war bunkers and building underground cities. The only purpose such bunkers and cities could serve is in relation to a future nuclear war. For a country that was supposedly broke to be spending its precious resources on something so expensive, so far out of the way of “normal” expectations, seemed inexplicable. “Oh well,” people would shrug. “The Russians are used to doing this sort of thing. It gives them psychological comfort. Let them do what they want. It needn’t trouble us.” The public missed the fact, however, that Russia was continuing to violate arms control agreements. It was not admitting to all the nuclear warheads it possessed, and was not reliably disposing of them. It was developing new, deadly, biological and chemical weapons.
Our lack of imagination, our inability to grasp our enemy’s thought process, leads us to dismiss what is obvious. The Russians are getting ready. Why isn’t the American side responding? Why aren’t the Americans getting ready? We have been seduced by a series of comforting illusions. We are also absorbed in a struggle against Islamic terrorism (only we are at pains to admit the “Islamic” aspect of it). The American shopping mall regime produces stupefaction and complacency. The regime is predicated on economic optimism and entertainment. This optimism is about to be shattered. The Russians know this is going to happen, and they are preparing even as we fail to prepare.
Originally posted by Copernicus
reply to post by LDragonFire
Interesting scenario. In any case, if USA attacks Iran and drags the middle east into a war, there is no question that the morally correct choice would be for the other super powers and other countries to attack the USA. Now, I dont dislike americans at all, or any other nationality on this planet, but USA must be stopped in its conquest for world domination and the New World Order, New American Century and whatever else they call it.
I really hope it doesnt come to that, but its in Bush hands now. Which is why im worried.
Question is, could the USA handle being attacked by Russia, China, Japan and many other countries at once? And would it accept defeat, or would it set off all its nuclear weapons to destroy most of the planet?
[edit on 29-9-2007 by Copernicus]
Originally posted by SEEWHATUDO
Hate us if you want but do not base that hate on very false beliefs. Hate our government for the atrocities they have afflicted, hate our rich for their greedy manipulations.
I'm afraid thats where the "generilasation" comes from. It may or may not be the case, but thats how it breaks down
I am a moderator, but I am also a member, we all are, I speak my mind on any issue here that I am interested in.
There is no more importance to what I have to say in this or any discussion where I am expressing my thoughts or opinions than those of ANYone else.
As the U.S. continues to sustain large military operations around the world and especially in the Middle East and with growing potential for new conflicts and wars is it not wise to suspect the Russians role in all of this?
signature
Collaborative blog, The collective mind of thousands brought together at AboveTopSecret.com to deny ignorance.
Before and even during the current Iraq war and invasion the Russians were assisting the Iraqis.
Originally posted by iskander
Before and even during the current Iraq war and invasion the Russians were assisting the Iraqis.
How about this one?
The exodus from Iraq to Syria by Saddam's allies and the highest ranking members of Saddam's regime didn't end on April 9th, but it was fully brought to the attention of the world when American Special Forces intercepted a Russian convoy headed into Syria. The Russians said that the convoy was on a diplomatic mission following a convoy that carried Primakov himself. To this day no one knows for sure. Some reports claim that Primakov's convoy carried Russian WMD people, documents, and equipment that could not be left to fall into the hands of the Coalition. That Russian convoys as well as convoys from Saddam’s regime were assembled and rushing out of Iraq/into Syria during those last few days has been well-reported by the mainstream media, and summarily ignored then forgotten.
The contents of the convoy that American commandos attacked remain classified, but former deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology and security, John A Shaw, reports that American intelligence has documents confirming that Saddam's Regime paid Russia to provide security forces for Iraq's Russian-made arms and paid Russia to conduct counterintelligence activities that would prevent the Coalition from discovering the illegal arms supply line from Russia through Syria. This is consistent with the other aid Russia is known to have provided Saddam’s regime in its last days.
Fox News confirmed that Russians were in fact selling the equipment to Baghdad and that Russian technicians were in the Iraqi capital this week, instructing Iraqis on how to use the devices. Russians were in Baghdad as of Friday but it's not known whether they have left.
"We are very concerned about reports that Russian firms are selling militarily sensitive equipment to Iraq," State Department spokeswoman Brenda Greenberg told Fox News. "Such equipment in the hands of the Iraqi military may pose a direct threat to U.S. and coalition armed forces."
Originally posted by phinubian
I was happy to have served at the end of the cold war, running from Spetznauts and looking out for SMLms..(soviet mission liason military) while stationed in Germany in the late 80's, anyhow I do feel that the U.S. is spread thin, however, I think to just look at Iraq and Afghanistan and come to the conclusion we are weak and vulnerable is very easy to do, but more realistically the Russians may have grown back their military but it would not be prudent, they learned a great lesson in Afghanistan and don't want to go down that road I believe, but they have to flex their muscles I would not expect them to conduct military operations as though they were somehow neutered and not capable of defense or offense.
For anyone not really in the know of the U.S. Military capabilities globally it would be a mistake to conclude that, if we can't win in Iraq we must be weak, first of all I think reason the war is drawn out in Iraq is for political, tactical and purposeful reasons in the long run and also for battle hardening troops for possible more escalating and serious warfare in that region.
The U.S. Navy alone will obliterate just about any other navy and perhaps army and can launch both conventional and Nuclear weapons anywhere in relative stealth from subs and carriers not to mention putting nuclear capable planes in the aire, the air force has this capability also but from the air, there are just too many factors for a smart enemy like the Russians or Chinese to even think of attacking us directly without like catastrophic consequences for their regions and the possibility of mutual destruction.
I think appearances of weakness are perhaps not the actual reality though.
Originally posted by kosmicjack
Lots of things going on in Russia lately. Didn't Putin just dismiss his entire cabinet? Sorry, if it has been mentioned already.
Originally posted by neformore
Originally posted by SEEWHATUDO
Hate us if you want but do not base that hate on very false beliefs. Hate our government for the atrocities they have afflicted, hate our rich for their greedy manipulations.
Not sure that you read my whole post. You seem to have missed this bit
I'm afraid thats where the "generilasation" comes from. It may or may not be the case, but thats how it breaks down