It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DogHead
Bob Lazar puzzles me. I wonder whether when he sounds scientifically inept it isn't really a result of him having to give off the cuff responses to complex matters and/or being requoted or paraphrased?
Just a thought.
Now, the thing is, this makes it real easy to verify that the piece of metal which Bob Lazar has in his possession is indeed element 115 as he describes it. You see, the antiprotons which, according to Bob, are emitted from 115, will annihilated with protons in the surrounding matter. This has to be by far the most direct and simple observation. The fact that Bob didn't do such experiment once again points int he direction that the whole 115 story is a fraud.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by buddhasystem
The fact that Bob didn't do such experiment once again points int he direction that the whole 115 story is a fraud.
First where did Bob say anti-protons are emitted from Element 115?
Also pease clarify this sentence:
"...will annihilated with protons in the surrounding matter.'
Why, on his own site... Do you even care to visit it? Or deep in you heart you know it's worthless?
Originally posted by johnlear
I can understand you defensiveness though, as your whole world crumbles beneath your feet.
You don't seem to be addressing the issue with as much confidence as you used to. Yes?
Alpha particles only travel a little over an inch in air
Originally posted by b309302
Just curious what equipment Bob had available to him at the time to analyize the 115, and the UFO's, and if it was more advanced then anything the public sector currently has.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
You were specifically referring to 115, but let's factor that out of our discussion for the moment. How, exactly, do we determine the atomic number of ANY element?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by buddhasystem
I feel lazy, since I could have looked that up by myself, so am grateful for your link.
Originally posted by TheAvenger
Surely Mass Spectroscopy would be the method of choice in most cases.
Originally posted by TheAvenger
I would still think that MS would be useful for isotopic ratios and atomic weight determination.