It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Copernicus
Originally posted by Herman
Yeah, because I'm sure Bush would be just as safe in Iran as Ahmadinejad was here...
Im guessing you havent even been to Iran with a statement like that.
Originally posted by Herman
I've never been the president of the United States on a trip to Iran, no. But I do have common sense. For our president to visit a country where he's loathed by a grand majority of the population which just happens to be riddled with terrorist organizations who clearly aren't afraid of committing suicide bombings and other attacks, and a president who leads "Death to America, Death to Israel" chants, would be a move indicating very little commons sense. Many of the people in this country (sadly) support ahmadeneholocaust denier. Many people in this country actually believe the things he says. He was under tight security the entire time. People applauded his speech. Do you really think that Bush would have the same courtesy over there?
Sorry about the run-on. No sleep = bad sentence structure for me.
Originally posted by Copernicus
Yes, but did you bother to find out why they dont like America or did you assume they are just born that way?
The truth is that you think american life is more valuable than iraqi life, and you dont bother to try and understand why America is disliked. I guess you assume that there is no rational reason to it or something, because those are just monkeys down there anyway, right?
Then you go on about how the Iranian president was applauded, when you know that he was attacked from the start when speaking at the university, and the "interview" was nothing more than bringing up things he had said (most of them intentionally misunderstood by the american media) and letting him try to defend himself, while being constantly interrupted by the hyperactive american "reporter" that have no respect for how other cultures do things at all.
Thats my view on it anyway. I think the reasons we dont get along on this planet is because our leaders intentionally promote hate between nations for greed and profit. And its so sad to me, because I realize what human kind could accomplish if we would stop killing eachother and use all that money to build perfect societies where everybody is very happy to be alive.
[edit on 30-9-2007 by Copernicus]
Originally posted by Herman
Hysterically hypocritical.
Gee, Copernicus, there I was thinking that I've come to my own conclusions based off of things I've studied and speaking to numerous people with first hand experience, but I'm so glad you could go and tell me the truth about what I think! And to think I never would have known what I was thinking if you hadn't come along...wow.
Funny, I'm pretty sure I heard the audience applaud on a number of occasions. When a leader that leads "Death to America, Death to Israel" chants comes to a University in that country to tell them what he thinks of them, he should be lucky that the only bad thing to happen to him was that he was interrupted.
In fact, I believe I only heard the audience really boo on one occasion - when the President said that his country "had no homosexuals."
A utopia is impossible.
And if you want to talk about countries that could be doing very well if it weren't for corrupt dictators, take a look at the middle east.
Very few people are "happy to be alive," especially ones that have everything.
People need hardship in their lives to appreciate the things around them.
I work at a coffee shop right now. The people who get all pissy like their day is ruined and complain that their Triple half-caf grande, 4 pump vanilla, 4 pump hazelnut, soy, 1/4 inch of foam, 160 degree caramel macchiato tastes like like the foam might have been aerated too much are usually the people who are the most well-off.
The construction workers that have been out working their rear-ends off for 16 hours in the 115 degree heat are usually the ones that are happy just to be able to get a hot cup of coffee (or an iced one on this occasion.)
Originally posted by Herman
I've never been the president of the United States on a trip to Iran, no. But I do have common sense.
For our president to visit a country where he's loathed by a grand majority of the population
which just happens to be riddled with terrorist organizations who clearly aren't afraid of committing suicide bombings and other attacks,
and a president who leads "Death to America, Death to Israel" chants,
would be a move indicating very little commons sense.
Many of the people in this country (sadly) support ahmadeneholocaust denier.
Many people in this country actually believe the things he says.
He was under tight security the entire time. People applauded his speech.
Do you really think that Bush would have the same courtesy over there?
Sorry about the run-on. No sleep = bad sentence structure for me.
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by Herman
Hysterically hypocritical.
Why don't you ask why so many dislikes the US foreign policy?
Fascinating.
So much for free speech! Why are we all shaking in our boots when a country such as Iran makes threats ( which are frequently entirely misrepresented) while we passively accept those made by nations such as the US knowing it's terrorist record all over the globe?
Why? I mean i can see why you would believe that having swallowed so much propaganda already but why do you specifically think that we can't all just 'get along'.
No surprise considering the immoral ways in which most fortunes are gained. I am surprised some of those people get any sleep...
It's mostly those who have never experienced hardship that fail to appreciate the luxuries they might have gained. Regular people who work and eventually do well appreciate things and that does a great deal to explain why Americans put up with so much governmental abuse.
Obviously but i don't see what they has to do with Utopia or regular working that have not been overwhelmed by a capitalist dogma?
Originally posted by Herman
Why should I ask when I already know? The presumptive nature of the people I have discussions with on this board continues to amaze me.
Why must you all assume that you know what I know and what I'm thinking?
Is there even a point in having a discussion with someone who has already decided what you're saying before you even say it?
I agree. Knowing what people are thinking before they say it is pretty fascinating. You should partner up with David Blaine.
Oh yes, I'm sure the threats are entirely misrepresented.
So what exactly does it mean to have a televised incident with Iranian soldiers parading around a missile that reads "Death to America and Israel"? Oh, I'm sure they meant that in a good way, right?
And you know, I really shouldn't be doing your research for you.
If you actually cared about an objective, intelligent opinion on these matters, you could find plenty of information in 5 minutes. But for some reason, you choose not to do so, and instead concoct these ideas that maybe achmedinejad isn't such a bad guy after all.
If you're still naive enough to believe that a utopia is possible, I shouldn't be having this conversation with you. I feel like I'm spoiling Santa Clause for some kid.
I've you just one of the millions of reasons why a utopia isn't possible right off the top of my head. Different people want different things out of life.
Some people would be perfectly happy having everything handed to them.
Their idea of a great life is to never have to work again.
Other people enjoy work, and the thrill of knowing that it's up to them to sink or swim.
The probability that they could fail is what drives them. If you were to suddenly tell them "OK, now we're going to pay for your car, your house, all of your food, and you'll never have to work a day in your life again." would be enough to drive them insane.
Another assumption
The first part of what you said basically just agrees with what I said.
As for Americans putting up with so much governmental abuse, are you saying that Americans have everything given to them? If so, that's just hilarious.
You don't see how that ties into what we were just talking about?
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by Herman
Why should I ask when I already know? The presumptive nature of the people I have discussions with on this board continues to amaze me.
As it does me.
Why must you all assume that you know what I know and what I'm thinking?
Not really but i strive to correct ignorance where i observe it however dogmatic and close minded the other person happens to be.
I just happen to understand what you have been reading and hearing on TV; it hardly requires a genius to know where your bias and 'knowledge' comes from.
Entirely misrepresented as it obvious by the necessity the US media sees in mistranslating what the Iranian president says!
Who translated it and i want the American and Israeli regimes dead as well!
Is 'America' or 'Israel' really the people or those who pretend to act in their interest? Why do properly translated version of Iranian claims indicate that they really wish death to the systems and not the peoples? More importantly what does some silly inscriptions on weapons 'prove' about the intent of the host government? Should i show you what some American soldiers have written on the bombs they drop on Iraqi's and Afghans?
And you know, I really shouldn't be doing your research for you.
You should be doing your own, yes.
I know of far worse people that are not getting any attention from the media you seem to trust to tell you about him. If you actually cared about an objective, intelligent opinion on these matter, you could find plenty of information but you should not trust any source that can bring it to you in five minutes. If you think these claims can be addressed with five minutes worth of googling your just wrong.
Utopia may be possible if people like you did not so diligently but into the doom&gloom propaganda!
People really want the same things as studying history would have quickly revealed to you.
The struggle for democracy and basic security ( food, warm place to sleep, community) is common to all human beings ( which i suppose is good reason to argue that some people are not from this planet) and given such a common aim 'utopia' seems more logical than what we are currently experiencing.
The rich and currently powerful who employ public treasuries to enrich themselves while the average person diligently pays taxes and works hard for his food? Since they are such a minority no one would miss them if they were gone and that's exactly what any utopia is going to require and apparently what the people of his planet has consistently tried to arrange.
Few people, mostly the above group, wish to do nothing at all but everyone wishes for a proper reward for the time spent.
Only the ignorant many who have fooled into thinking that everyone in the economy sinks or swims. Do you realise that a large majority of Americans ( 75-80% as i remember ) still believes that there should be a extensive social security net to help those who do not swim so well? How can that be in a society where people have been so indoctrinated to believe that there is only sinking or swimming? People do seem to understand what is right and what is good for most but they are being prevented from bringing about the implementation of such common dreams.
The mind of the commissar is indeed a most fascinating, to say nothing of twisted, place. What drives Americans to work so hard is not that they might fail but knowing that there are very few systems that will help them when they do. They do not wish for it to be so but they can not impress upon their government their wants of a social safety net such as those in Scandinavian countries. Why would a government have to pay for people to have a car, a house and all their food when they stop taking those people's money and giving it to those who do not need it? Why not just leave people alone to at least fend for themselves instead of robbing them blind at every turn and pretending that it's fair contest of sinking and swimming?
It's a fact and a rather well known one outside of the commissar classes. Commissars are obviously not those who are very rich but those who believe they may become so by doing and believing what they are told. The joke is obviously on them but they are normally the last to know.
Sieg Heil of ignorance!!
Well done Herman....
Stellar
Originally posted by Herman
Oh, Stellar, how backwards can you be? Can you get through a single post
without assuming something about the person with whom you're debating?
Someday, perhaps, you'll look back and realize what you were doing; why you have to keep knocking down scarecrows instead of actually having a real debate.
Originally posted by StellarX
You're one of those people.
Does your refusal to look at things from another viewpoint make a lot of things clear to you? If I were to put on a blindfold, the blackness would be very clear to me as well.
Would you like to show me where I've been dogmatic, or is this just another word you've been trained to throw at me?
Ignorant, blind, close-minded, dogmatic, all words in the "I Think I'm Better Than You But I've Never Actually Done Anything To Validate It" encylopedia/dictionary.
They can also be found in The Idiot's Guide to Being Pretentious.
Sure you do. It amazes me how so many people such as yourself can't even see through their own B.S. How do you know what I as an individual have been reading or watching?
You talk about ignorance and close-mindedness, yet there's clearly a large group of people that you choose to lump together. Is it Americans? Are you prejudiced against Americans?
How do you know that I don't read things on the internet from alternative news sources?
How do you know that I'm not reading the exact same information that you are? The truth is that you don't.
You assume because it makes you feel like you're right. I encourage you to break out of your shell and breathe some fresh air for once.
Would you mind telling me what was mistranslated in the video I posted?
And there it is...wow.
Our silly inscriptions on bombs are just that - silly inscriptions that individual soldiers decided to write.
It's a little different than having our president approve a huge banner and orchestrating a parade around the missile on national television. I hope you can see that. In fact, I know that you can see that.
Way to twist some words!
You think I trust our media? Come on, you've already lumped me into a category; at least stick with one.
]If you consider reality doom and gloom, then sure.
That sentence right there makes it pretty obvious that you spend too much time sitting around reading, and not enough time in the real world.
Christ, I'm only 20 years old. I'm not expert on life, but I can see the naivety of that statement a mile away.
Would you care to suggest to me an idea of your utopia? Just give everybody their basic needs and they would all be happy? I highly doubt that would work.
As long as they live, most people will keep striving to do better and better.
The best way to make that possible is to give everybody freedom. But we can't simply let everybody loose and have some anarchistic society.
What do you propose we do?
Typical. You assume that the rich and powerful didn't work hard to get where they were; that they're lazy.
'll tell you a quick, extremely abridged version of a story about my family. The family my father came from was dirt poor. His brother, my uncle, was an extremely hard worker. He is now very wealthy.
He strived on hard work and constantly bettering himself.
Did he go on welfare or ask for government assistance? Hell no - he worked his behind off to get the things he wanted out of life.
Now that he has them, does some idiot have the right to call him lazy, or to tax him into poverty again?
I don't think so - he earned every dollar he made, and so did my father, so did my grandfather, and so did other people that I know personally (Not all of them live in this country, either.)
He's one of the most hard working people I've ever known; getting only a couple hours a sleep a night because he was so busy working for his dream.
I would like to ask you where people like him fit into your utopia
What right does somebody like you, or any government have to stop somebody from attaining their dreams?
I know other people as well. People who don't like work.
People who went on welfare and government aid because their perfectly happy with their basic needs.
Have you ever done any real research about who pays the majority of taxes in the U.S? Do you realize what a shockingly large percent of our tax burden the top 5% and 1% of earners in my country pays?
Originally posted by Herman
gain, a continuation of your backwards assumption that the rich and lazy go together. Maybe that's so for people who inherit their money, but not for everybody.
No one thing will ever be good for everybody. We all have to make our own way - that's what I believe.
The freedom to succeed or fail means a lot to me. Sure, a safety net would be right, but let people do what they want with their business and money.
Again, guess who pays that majority of the tax burden in our country. I'll let you in on a little secret; it's not the poor.
U.S. taxes.
Yes, the link is slightly old. That didn't take me long to find. Again, do your research and you'll find the same things I've found.
I suppose the family and friends I have that have become successful are commissars?
I guess I'll keep waiting until they realize how wrong they were. I have a feeling I'm going to be waiting a long time.
And there you go again.