It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Video of WTC with Explosions Evident

page: 1
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 28 2007 @ 10:53 AM
link   
There is a new video of the airliner impact on the South Tower.

www.garagetv.be...

Check the footage at approx. the 6:20 mark.

The explosion(s) seem to take place at the moment the airliner strikes WTC2.

I have looked several time closely. It is possible it is the blast wave from the jet impact however the existing smoke appears unaffected???

Warning! the video contains graphic footage!!




posted on Sep, 28 2007 @ 11:10 AM
link   
That was as graphic as they get. That video gave me chills all over. I think of what the people were thinking as they fell to their deaths.



posted on Sep, 28 2007 @ 11:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Leo Strauss
 


No offense to you personaly but this video is another fake. At least the Audio in it is... A disinfo peice propagated by those responsible.

Why so many cut scenes? Why not post the whole thing in however many parts it takes? Why cut it into a more dramatic peice when the days events are dramtic enough... And at one point the film slows to zoom in on a manhattan demolition truck kinda insinuateing the guy videoing is a truther..if such is so then he should know the value of every second of film footage... instead this video has been edited for a more dramitc effect.

Moments after 6:20 when he focuses on the ground thier is spray paint that looks like its construction related...execpt it says OIL OK...very strange.



posted on Sep, 28 2007 @ 11:40 AM
link   
reply to post by titorite
 


No offense taken. To me the video has an authentic feel of amateur editing.

My primary concern is the apparent blast as the airliner stikes WTC 2. I don't believe that footage is faked??



posted on Sep, 28 2007 @ 12:51 PM
link   
thanks for sharing (Y) I think i have seen segments of this clips before but not at this length. Sounds like there is a massive explosion when that firetruck passes by (just after 6:30 somewhere), the ed slowed it down though so its tough to tell exactly, I am tempted to dl the video and speed up that section so i can analysis the blast acoustics. Don't think many people picked up on that, could be used as further evidence to support explosions and the audio quality isnt bad so might be worth doing.



posted on Sep, 28 2007 @ 03:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Insolubrious
 


The only section that I noticed which was slowed down was at 9:22 when the "Manhattan Demolition" truck passed between the camera and the shot of the towers.

Is there another I missed?

Manhattan Demolition...I can see why he slowed down the footage!

Again...at 6:20 does anyone else have opinions on the apparent blast from within the North Tower as the jet impacts. To me it appears that these blasts appear 2 or 3 floors below the existing fire and damage.



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 12:11 AM
link   
Fascinating video. As far as the cuts, I would gather these were naturally points where the subject was moving to a fresh location, as evidenced in the location changes. Further, if a Manhatten Demo truck passed, then that's significant. Of course one would take note of that.

Frankly, I'm suprised there aren't hundreds of these videos considering the proliferation of camcorders today and the literally thousands of people on site.



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 12:11 AM
link   
Fascinating video. As far as the cuts, I would gather these were naturally points where the subject was moving to a fresh location, as evidenced in the location changes. Further, if a Manhatten Demo truck passed, then that's significant. Of course one would take note of that.

Frankly, I'm suprised there aren't hundreds of these videos considering the proliferation of camcorders today and the literally thousands of people on site.



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 12:19 AM
link   
whoa...


long long long skeptic on the fake video thing... buttt....

Part 7 Pandemonium
(right around 10:30 remaining)
the shot of the empire state building on two different sides of the towers, and the same buildings line up in the back ground made me curse out loud.

I have no friggin idea what to think now.

I guess i can continue to stick to the root believe of 'trust the government least of all'


=(


edit to say...

Just realized this was from totally different 9-11 video brought up in the comments section of that movies page... also worth checking out
September clues



[edit on 29-9-2007 by coven]



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 02:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by titorite
Moments after 6:20 when he focuses on the ground thier is spray paint that looks like its construction related...execpt it says OIL OK...very strange.

Bingo. Good eyes.



This video does look staged and it looks like some kind of production for some reason.

All in my opinion, of course.



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 02:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Check the footage at approx. the 6:20 mark.

The explosion(s) seem to take place at the moment the airliner strikes WTC2.


I see what your talking about. I see what appears to be explosions which I pointed to in the image, but how do you know it is when the other plane strikes the other tower? The only thing that might give you that idea is the sound in the video, but how do you know it wasn't altered?




posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 03:04 AM
link   
The background being the same from front and back angles were dumbfounding. I cursed loudly too coven. Never did I come to think that the media could have been involved. Yes filtered, controlled by gov, but involved? Or preconceived? Impossible! one would think, but apparently true and very sad...

About the "oil ok" That is very big coincidence in my opinion. Turn it sideways and it could be something construction wise, or graffiti totally different. Yes it could be a legit sign, but dont base your whole 9/11 theory on that basis...

Seeing the people fall made me cry, I have never cried at a 9/11 film until this one. I feel I will cry every time I see any one from now on. Actually seeing it like that makes it all the more real... I can't imagine how those people on the floors, that took the most damage, felt when they had no choice but to fall. I do not know they're situation but I would have tried to find an alternative down, I hope they tried. I can remember siting in my classroom watching this in 9th grade science, not actually thinking people were dying at that very moment, how naive I was! how naive many were, and still are. And what about the man filming it, when he zoomed and saw it was people, that must have affected him bad, traumatized. I want to bring whoever did this to justice, knowing that god will can make everyone feel a bit better. God bless every man, woman, child that died that day (that die any day), may they find happiness in the next life. And the firefighters, policeman, that rushed in when everyone was rushing out, god bless their courage and strength! I want to get to the bottom of this for the sake of the ones who died like that, or died at all! Damn you government! DAMN YOU AND YOUR OIL DEATH MACHINES, WAS IT WORTH IT KILLING?


Babylon will fall



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 03:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hal9000

Originally posted by titorite
Moments after 6:20 when he focuses on the ground thier is spray paint that looks like its construction related...execpt it says OIL OK...very strange.

Bingo. Good eyes.




I haven't watched the video yet, as I can't stomach people falling to their deaths right now, but the markings above are most likely construction markers for underground conduits of some sort--its very common on the pavement in Manhattan for these kinds of notes to be spray-painted on the sidewalks before they tear them up--as they love to do.

IMO you've read it wrong, though. I'm fairly certain what you are reading as the K in OK is actually a marking line with an arrow/chevron which indicates where some pipe or conduit is located beneath. The upper part could read OIL, indicating a fuel oil pipe below, or it could also read 0:1, perhaps indicating some sort of boundary line.



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 06:37 AM
link   


Moments after 6:20 when he focuses on the ground thier is spray paint that looks like its construction related...execpt it says OIL OK...very strange.


Person filming was outside of WTC 7 where there were large fuel tanks
holding diesel fuel for the backup generators housed in the building.
Most likely put there to warn construction workers not to dig in the
area - not wanting to "strike oil"



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 09:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Leo Strauss
There is a new video of the airliner impact on the South Tower.

www.garagetv.be...

Check the footage at approx. the 6:20 mark.

The explosion(s) seem to take place at the moment the airliner strikes WTC2.

I have looked several time closely. It is possible it is the blast wave from the jet impact however the existing smoke appears unaffected???

Warning! the video contains graphic footage!!


i think that when the explosions are seen, it is actually when the plane hits, because i have seen more video about 9/11/01 and, yes, even on other videos you can see the explosions when the plane hits.



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 11:26 AM
link   
I'm a truther, butjust because a company is named "Manhatten Demolition", does not mean they do controlled demolitions.

I worked for many demo companies that never used explosives. They just take out walls, with sledgehammers and jackhammers , and clean up the mess ect.

But I guess to have the name "Manhatten Demolition", and the red garbage type truck (all we had were dumptrucks) lends credence that the truck belongs to the city.

However, coming from a truther that truck being there proves nothing, imo--unfortunately. They are probably all over the Island every day on every other block doing work. They're always ripping up roads, tearing stuff up there, anyone who has lived or worked there knows this.

Also there are much worse video of jumpers taken from nearby rooftops, that actually show them landing tragic stuff. I remember seeing them jumping live the day it happened, I cried that day so much, I never cried again.

But what shocks me in this video is how loud the sirens passing close by to the camera in the beggining are, but at 6:20 when the second plane supposedly hits, you can just barely hear a slight roar maybe starting at 6:18, then the crash, and its very, very faint. You would think you'd hear a much louder screaming for a longer period of time from a 767 flying into the building. Unless he was on the opposite side, it appears it definitely didnt fly right over him, but still I would expect to hear more of an approach roar from a large passenger jet.



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 12:20 PM
link   

And at one point the film slows to zoom in on a manhattan demolition truck kinda insinuateing the guy videoing is a truther..


Before there was a truth movement?

Brilliant.



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by jprophet420

And at one point the film slows to zoom in on a manhattan demolition truck kinda insinuateing the guy videoing is a truther..


Before there was a truth movement?

Brilliant.


well the video could have been edited to slow down those frames at any time over the past 6 years.

Does anyone know when "that" was done and exactly by who?

So whoever actually edited it is obviously a truther. Do we know if it was the guy who took the original footage? That's basically what I'm saying.

[edit on 29-9-2007 by Nola213]



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 03:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by gottago

Originally posted by Hal9000

Originally posted by titorite
Moments after 6:20 when he focuses on the ground thier is spray paint that looks like its construction related...execpt it says OIL OK...very strange.

Bingo. Good eyes.




I haven't watched the video yet, as I can't stomach people falling to their deaths right now, but the markings above are most likely construction markers for underground conduits of some sort--its very common on the pavement in Manhattan for these kinds of notes to be spray-painted on the sidewalks before they tear them up--as they love to do.

IMO you've read it wrong, though. I'm fairly certain what you are reading as the K in OK is actually a marking line with an arrow/chevron which indicates where some pipe or conduit is located beneath. The upper part could read OIL, indicating a fuel oil pipe below, or it could also read 0:1, perhaps indicating some sort of boundary line.


Your analysis is the correct one. EVERY time you dig (even not in manhattan) you have to call a central office (down here it's called miss utilities ) that informs all utility companies that you plan to dig. Then the utility companies go out and mark where their lines are. In this case, there was an oil line 0 ft from the mark line. The zero and the mark line with an arrow is what looks like OK. If the line had been 6 feet in from the mark line, it would have read:

i
OIL i
6 i<
i

I used I's for the line but you get the idea.

Edit: I can't line up the I's but I think people will still understand what I'm saying.

[edit on 9/29/2007 by Griff]

[edit on 9/29/2007 by Griff]



posted on Sep, 29 2007 @ 03:22 PM
link   
"Check the footage at approx. the 6:20 mark.

The explosion(s) seem to take place at the moment the airliner strikes WTC2. "


My 2 cents:

I think what we're seeing is the result of the impact of the jet. You see the smoke first a second before you hear the impact - this seems normal given the distance the filmer is from the buiding. You would not hear the sound at the same instant as the impact. Same principle as see lightning and then hearing the thunder moments later.

I don't think this proves anything. Although I would be interested in hearing how the conspirators managed to get people to jump.....



new topics

top topics



 
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join