It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Please. If your so called evidence was so irrefutable, the media you are "constantly approaching" would be banging on your door in the blink of an eye. Until that happens, there will be nothing even remotely close to a grand jury on the matter.
It is no secret that evidence against the 9/11 official story is margianlized, demonized, and ingnored by media and authorities.
Did you mean your evidence or evidence in general?
So the whole point of your "no stone unturned investigation" was to get them to start an investigation. Such a cop out. If you were as commited to the truth as you were in selling advertising space on your forum, you would follow this investigation to wherever it leads you. Your investigation has gone backwards from the very beginning, you started with your conclusion, then found facts (and alleged witnesses) to fit your theory. You have dismissed other witnesses and other evidence.
CIT theory(in a nutshell):
No plane hit the Pentagon, but dont ask us what did or why or how or what happened to the passengers or anything like that. Leave that for the next group of dedicated "investigators."
CT
Originally posted by drannno
Did you not consider that the plane was a lot closer to the witness when it was on the north side of the citgo station, yet much FURTHER from the witness when it hit the Pentagon.
Also, if you want your contractor questions answered, go see my thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by drannno
If you're so ignorant as to think that people won't commit crimes for money, well, you should really see that movie I posted in the above thread. .............. What I'm saying is that the contractors were most likely drug dealers dressed up in uniforms. That's why they haven't said anything.. You guys think we are accusing law abiding citizens of the frame and cover-up.......HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAH.....
What I'm saying is that the contractors were most likely drug dealers dressed up in uniforms.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT
Im confused Craig.
North of the citgo IS evidence for a military deception including a flyover whether or not you continue to live in denial about it.
I suppose you could come up with your own theory with what happened to the plane after it flew north of the citgo but we believe the most logical and rational hypothesis based on this evidence is that the plane flew over the building.
In another thread you wrote this. These posts are 8 mins apart by the way.
North of the citgo testimony proves flyover and you have provided NOTHING to refute it.
Source
All emphasis mine
So is it hypothesis as to what happened after the plane allegedly flew north of the citgo, or does the alleged flight prove what happened?
CT
Wrong. The media is 100% complicit and/or manipulated in this operation.
It is no secret that evidence against the 9/11 official story is margianlized, demonized, and ingnored by media and authorities.
All evidence in general that contradicts the official story.
Did you know that the 9/11 commission and the media ignore the anomalous unprecedented mysterious 7 second collapse of building 7?
Perhaps you should look into it.
You have ZERO basis to state these LIES about me and I demand proof or a retraction.
1. We sell no advertising space on our forum here at ATS, our website, or anywhere.
2. We report the evidence PERIOD. We had no idea what the witnesses would report. You have ZERO basis to accuse us of skewing the evidence based on our beliefs and if you don't prove your libelous claim or retract it this will be addressed first with the owners of this site.
FACT: Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"[\ex]
[edit on 26-10-2007 by syrinx high priest]
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT
a tiny scrap of what ? a missile or a jet ?
I'm still waiting for a detailed account of what happened to the crew and passengers
And it is not our responsibility to tell you what happened to the original plane.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT
And it is not our responsibility to tell you what happened to the original plane.
And there goes your credibility. If people are to believe your claims about what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11, you need a complete theory that answers all the questions. Not a half baked one that disregards evidence and eyewitnesses.
You dont seriously expect people to accept your theory without asking valid questions.
You claim:
The plane flew north of the citgo and overflew the pentagon allowing something else to cause the damage.
I (and others) respond:
If the plane overflew the pentagon, what happened to the passengers and crew? And what caused the damage?
These are valid questions based on your theory. Questions you always seem to brush off with your "not our responsibility" line.
CT
And there goes your credibility. If people are to believe your claims about what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11, you need a complete theory that answers all the questions. Not a half baked one that disregards evidence and eyewitnesses.
You dont seriously expect people to accept your theory without asking valid questions.