It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
To bad we can't get pictures of the accident investigation for they will take every aircraft part they can find and lay them all out on a hanger floor in the place where they would have been on the aircraft to study.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
@seanm: I'm still undecided - wading through everything. I'm a tough cookie when it comes to proof. I'm also a skeptic - why hide perfectly good evidence if it corroborates the official story? Governments lie for a living.
Originally posted by jprophet420
reply to post by seanm
Hmm, craig didn't write the official story. he points out the inconsistancies in the official story proving it wrong. failure to answer questions beyond that does not make the story 'better again'. it doesent 'undebunk' it.
if it is wrong through malice or or negligence remains to be seen.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
Before I forget - the official story said it had knocked down 4 or 5 lamp posts?? Here is what happens at taxiing speed:
www.b3ta.com...
Debunk that!
It is interesting to note that at no time did any of the crash reports or investigations allow for a heavily damaged wing. Like an F1 car, aircraft are strong in the planes that they take normal flying loads. Outside of that, they're built to be light.
[edit on 4-10-2007 by mirageofdeceit]
Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen
This argument is beyond old. Putting everything in perspective, this building is 77 feet high, and the tail of the 757 tops out at 33 feet. Unless you saw this damage in person, you have NO idea how immense it was. I know individuals who were there and saw the plane hit, so this debate is moot. I have seen the damage firsthand, and it was so much larger and gaping that these photos could ever leave you to believe.
I am an open minded person, and I love nothing more than to investigate situations in search of the truth. This however WAS an airplane hit, and those of you who wish to believe otherwise may be my guest, but I know what I saw, and what acquaintenances of mine saw as well.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Craig, if you're so sure this is a small pile of rubble, where's that rebar sticking out from? Please explain this if you can.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
(Yes, I took you out of my ignore list).
Answer me this - if the jet hit the light poles, why are ONLY the light poles downed, ad don't appear to have any scrap of jet attached to them?? Please show me a single pole with any hint of a wing or scrap of metal that got left behind as the 757 hit it.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by Caustic Logic
You've been ignoring me lately.