It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Neo-Cons could have saved a trillion dollars, spared over a million lives and prevented tens of thousands of dead and injured U.S. soldiers but decided to unleash carnage anyway, after it was revealed last night that Saddam Hussein offered to step down and go into exile one month before the invasion of Iraq.
"Fearing defeat, Saddam was prepared to go peacefully in return for £500million ($1billion)," reports the Daily Mail. ...
"It seems he's indicated he would be prepared to go into exile if he's allowed to take $1billion and all the information he wants about weapons of mass destruction."
Originally posted by deltaboy
Guess Saddam still wanted WMDs even in exile if allowed.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
If they paid the 1 billion dollars, they would not have been able to make money out of this racket called the Iraq War. Halliburton wouldn't have made money. Blackwater wouldn't have made money. A lot of other American interests wouldn't have made money. It was simply not as efficient.
*Double speak in effect
Originally posted by FredT
The question is would that have prevented this debacle? I doubt it. Would have made the war part a bit easier, but the post Saddam era? They would have still had thier BS game plan and more likely with less ground troops than before.
Originally posted by SonicInfinity
True, but why would the government keep Saddams "surrender" as a secret?
Originally posted by deltaboy
If I remember just prior to Iraq War, Saddam didn't even mentioned anything about surrendering or going to exile. Unless he works for the U.S. govt.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Who said American interests were the same as the interests of the American people? In the context of my previous post, clearly I was referring to American corporate interests.
Originally posted by SonicInfinity
I don't recall calling American interests the same as the interests of the American people. If my post has been interpreted as such, I apologize.
Originally posted by FredT
Who knows why? I had an old history prof who had been an analyst at the CIA. he said alot of stuff gets classified not because of what it is but rather to protect teh source of the information. maybe they are protecting the go betweens in the deal?
Also you have to remember that this administration basicaly has made a secret out of everything.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
You mentioned the US trade deficit. I interpret that as the interest of the US public a.k.a. the people. The trade deficit means absolutely squat to corporate interests. It doesn't reflect their profit.
Are we on the same page now?