It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadowflux
This nonsense about planes not hitting the WTC needs to stop.
Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
. I don’t understand why Ignorance keeps bringing this up.
Very interesting discussion. However, I haven't seen an answer to my question from Mr. Lear or the rest of the holograph supporters. Namely, if no planes were used, what happened to the people that were supposedly on those planes?
Originally posted by johnlear
I'm what you call a "No Planer". Its a tough and thankless job. But somebody has to do it, because its the truth.
Many don't believe its the truth. Some don't believe it because they are simply uninformed. Others simply don't want to believe it.
Originally posted by 23432
Hello John and every other user ; I was in Las Vegas on 1/11 and I was attending a software related business meeting .
The subject was " Augmented Reality " and I was trying to sell a product / concept .
Here is the technology in action : www.magicsymbol.com...
John ; you are a one fascinating individual , I would love to have a beer or two with you .
Originally posted by johnlear
Because I believe that the government used holographs to fabricate Boeing 767's flying into the World Trade Center to incite hatred against Muslim/Arabs to fabricate a reason to attack and control Afghanistan to grow, cultivate, transport and market illegal drugs the profits of which are used for black projects.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I love how after I issue a solid rebuttal to Mr. Lear's answer, he responds to others while skipping over me, and then all the No Planers arrive to talk it up as if there's no doubt.
recover treble damages and civil penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. P. 3729-33 and to recover all available damages and other monetary relief under the common law or equitable theories of unjust enrichment, payment under mistake of fact, recoupment of overpayments and common law fraud, based on defendant’s false claims and false statements made in and pursuant to certain reports, meetings, decision-making procedures, documentation, analyses of various types that resulted in the accumulation of thousands of pages of text, reports, illustration and graphic displays for which the defendants received significant monetary compensation, all the while having overt and direct knowledge, that all such documentation was either false, fraudulent, a sham and/or designed to obfuscate the true and correct state of affairs that existed and that was hidden and hereinafter articulated in detail including:
(13)… defendants and each and every one of them especially those among them who are developers of PsyOps, including by way of non-exhaustive example, SAIC and ARA, committed fraud in seeking to have NCSTAR 1 deceive the public into not recognizing that WTC1,2 could not reasonably or possibly have been hit by jetliners in the manner depicted in some (but not other TV feeds) absent the use of PsyOps. Some of the defendants knew as much; other defendants either knew or if they did not, they should have known as it is all but obvious that hollow aluminum cannot glide through reinforced steel. To the extent they did not know this, such ignorance was willful, intentional and actionable under the False Claims Act.
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP.;
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.;
BOEING; NuSTATS; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.;
DATASOURCE, INC.; GEOSTAATS, INC.;
GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK LLP;
HUGHES ASSOCIATES, INC.; AJMAL ABBASI;
EDUARDO KAUSEL; DAVID PARKS;
DAVID SHARP; DANIELE VENEZANO;
JOSEF VAN DYCK; KASPAR WILLIAM;
ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC;
ROSENWASSER/GROSSMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.;
SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER, INC.;
S. K. GHOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.;
SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL, LLP;
TENG & ASSOCIATES, INC.;
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC.;
WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC.;
AMERICAN AIRLINES; SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES;
and UNITED AIRLINES.
None of the upper sections (the 45 exterior columns that were fractured in the North Tower between floors 94 and 98) visibly sags or buckles towards its counterpart column below. We can infer this because of the aluminum covers on the columns: each seam uniformly aligns properly across the tower, forming a horizontal ‘dashed line’ in the facade from beveled end to end. Despite (what is allegedly) an impact hole, gaps in perimeter columns, and missing parts of floors 95-98 at the opening, the aluminum façade shows no evidence of vertical displacement in the columns, suggestive of little or no wider floor buckling at the perimeter.
The aluminum covers attached to the columns also aligned vertically after (alleged) impact, that is, separated columns continued to visually remain, ‘plumb’ (true vertical), lining up top to bottom around the aperture, implying no perceptible horizontal displacement of the columns. Photographic evidence for the northeast side of the north tower showed no wider secondary structural impact beyond the opening itself.
Several of the defendants with whom NIST contracted for services in the preparation of NCSTAR 1 are, themselves, primarily engaged as defense contractors in a variety of disciplines, including, without limitation, very specific involvement in the use, development, manufacture, testing and or assessment of usability of directe d energy weapons. In other words, NIST contracted with those who have the greatest familiarity with directed energy weapons in order to produce a report that sought to go to any length necessary to avoid, disguise, omit and otherwise divert attention away from the actual, real and intended destruction of the WTC complex by use of one device, namely directed energy weaponry, while pretending that the cause was the result of conditions that would be impossible based on the extent to which the NIST report, NCSTAR 1 violated both the laws of physics and common sense. By way of one example, NIST’s NCSTAR 1 report found no piece of steel that had been subjected to a temperature higher than 600 degrees C, and most had not encountered a temperature of higher than 250 degrees C; yet, NIST offered no explanation whatever for the visual confirmation that most of the steel of the WTC complex was turned to dust and otherwise visibly subjected to a destructive process that could not conceivably have been caused by the effects, combined or otherwise, of jet fuel, gravity and/or damage from jetliner impacts.
Here are some questions you may be able to answer or shine some light on for us on ATS.
1. Is this a contrived and pretend War in Afghanistan even though many good men have lost their lives?
2. Is Ben Laden or his stand in working for the C.I.A. and releasing the videos at strategic times when needed to propagate the war in Afghanistan?
3. Is the reason that Ben Laden has not been captured is to give our military a reason to stay in the area to protect the poppy fields at all costs?
4. How long do you think Project 911 was in the works before being implemented?
5. Do you think there is a time table after 911 being implemented in steps for the loss of our freedoms in the United States Of America?
6. If in fact these were holographic projections of planes hitting the twin towers. Were these projections being made from inside the towers, outside the towers by stealth fighters, invisible UFOs, digital Lazer 3-D program or some other way that you may be aware of that the holograms were being projected?