posted on Sep, 27 2007 @ 08:56 PM
Since the other thread died just as i posted, I'll post this here:
As far as I know the No Plane'rs contention is 'now i made be wrong here', and I don't wanna put words in anyones mouth, but from the research
I've done, here is what i believe thier theory is
The only shots non eyewitnesses saw ON 9/11 were those on the television, namely the now famous "nose-out clip", and many other clips of the
television logo and banner covering the second planes approach.
This was a CGI plane, covering a cruise missile or what have you. No holograms used.
(The first impact was never show on TV on 9/11, although Bush says otherwise)
Now to the eye witnesses, I believe the No plane folks believe there were large commercial aircraft flying past the Towers as the missles or what have
you hit. Remember the large plane seen circling over manhatten(vey small and hard to see in the NY clips, same as the pentagon but much easier to
Now anyone who knows anything about eyewitness testimony, especially during times of stress, stickups, murders, ect. There have been studies, and
eyewitness idetification is pretty sketchy at best, I'll leave it at that.
The media interviewed supposedly interviewed only thier people, and even some of them didn see a plane. There are also a couple strange characters who
had some pretty solid info in interviews just after the collapse, like that one guy in the Harley shirt, talking about why the buildings collapse, was
like he was reading from a script.
Many people said they saw no planes hit the buildings, but they were pushed aside, and only those who fell for the fly by (thats how you get the jet
sound), missle hit, as being a real plane crashing into a building were interviewed. Again, most if not all had affiliations to the media, the couple
that weren't could have easily been stooges. A good illusionist always has stooges and plants in the audience.
BUT only until Sept 12 did we see for the first time the first strike and other clear shots of the second impact, most all of which have problems
accordinding to the no plane folks. I agree that the Micheal Hezzerkani(sp?) footage looks very suspect, and at first someone else was credited for
that piece of film, but now it's said to be his, but he can't say where he shot it from, because the angles and such don't line up.
The planes melting into the buildings is what bothers me. I mean slowed down the plane is in to the Tower almos all the way to it's tail section
before we see any damage to the building.
Again I've read alot of the No planers stuff, and I don't think they say it was holograms. They claim tv fakery with CGI, and false/planted, or just
plain confused witnenesses.
**But here's the sad thing. EVEN if it was no planes(I haven't really made up my mind one way or another), it IS makeing alot of people stay away
from the 9/11 truth movement. If they would just keep that stuff under thier hats, and go with the CD/prior knowledge which can be better proven and
won't scare people away from the movement thinking we're a bunch of nutters, we'd get alot more done, and get the true criminals even if for
I mean they nailed Capone on Tax Evasion. Sometimes you gotta go in through the back door and do things you don't want to just to see justice dealt.
Sheesh for all we know they have disinfo guys planted in the movement.
I wish the LIHOP and MIHOP supporters, and the Planes and No planes people would come together, and figure out what is the best way to bring these
criminals to justice. Because in the end that is what we ALL want yes?, and after they're rotting in thiers cells we can comtinue the argument. They
have us divided right how, and isn't that the NWO's mantra? divide and conquer
I say we get the people we can get in any way with concrete evidence that is out there to prior knowledge. Sheesh arrest Gulliani for destroying a
crime scene. Anything, any arrests made will be a step in the right direction