It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yfxxx
... isn't a "holographic projection" at all! It's an old illusion named "Pepper's Ghost":
If you've ever visited the Haunted Mansion ride at the Disney theme parks, you'll find tons of tributes to it in this film. Gypsy fortune teller Madame Leota (Jennifer Tilly) is that weird green hologram head in a globe
Originally posted by zorgon
How are you ever going to be taken seriously as a debunker if you just keep getting your facts wrong?
Passing through a narrow corridor of shaking and rattling doors, the patrons emerge into a séance, led by Madame Leota, a glowing, disembodied head speaking from within a misty crystal ball. In response to her supplications, various objects and ectoplasmic lights are dancing overhead. Madame Leota is named after Leota Toombs, a veteran Cast Member who had worked at both Disneyland and, later, Walt Disney World, maintaining the audioanimatronic characters’ cosmetic appearances. For the effect, a projection of a real actress (Toombs) performing as Madame Leota is projected from a 16mm projector onto a static head form, creating a startlingly realistic and eerie effect.
Can jet fuel burn hot enough to burn steel (even with the presense of other materials) Well, according to various sites, jet fuel burns at around 1700-1800 degrees F. Steel melts at 2500 degrees F. This suggests not.
The tube system concept is based on the idea that a building can be designed to resist lateral loads by designing it as a hollow cantilever perpendicular to the ground. In the simplest incarnation of the tube, the perimeter of the exterior consists of closely spaced columns that are tied together with deep spandrel beams through moment connections. This assembly of columns and beams forms a rigid frame that amounts to a dense and strong structural wall along the exterior of the building.
To say there is no evidence of plane parts is asinine. There is an ample amount of pictures and videos both mainstream and simply from people with phone cameras and hand held camcorders that show the debris.
In summary there is no evidence of any kind that any Boeing 767 crashed into either the north or the south tower of the World Trade Center. It is pure fiction.
Can you answer one question for me please? When somebody posts in regards to evidence of debris at the World Trade Center site that you have posted that same picture in response many times, and the picture isn't even from wreckage at the WTC?
Hasnt Milton given you any insight into the 911 story? I would love to know the real deal....but he's probably not talking??
John, what happened to the crew and passengers of the planes that were flown into the towers in your theory ?
I'm not asking for a link to another webiste or your theory, I'm asking for physical evidence.
It happened in 2001, so I'm sure the evidence has come out by now, right ?
Please present exactly what happened, supported by independently verified physical evidence, like photos or audio.
Originally posted by Insolubrious
The only thing that really makes sense to me is that the planes had explosive payloads on them which blew them to smithereens thus we have lack of debris and unexpected damage.
Originally posted by johnlear
Milton told me everything but he made me promise not to tell. Its supposed to be a surprise.
Darn you lucky dogs touched by "Milton"!.......Sorry to get off the hologram subject but you mentioned in your thread you went to the remote viewing training...I was looking at her website....did you find the experience worthwile...Ive tried RV on my own with not much success...