posted on Oct, 18 2007 @ 04:07 PM
I've just finished reading all the posts on this thread and it really is an interesting theory. I've only just started to look at the 9/11
conspiracies and I have a list of questions I'd like to get answered but this is not the thread for it.
Looking at the footage of the attacks posted by various posters, 1 thing became apparent. All of the official footage (by TV cameras) doesn't appear
to the show plane physically hitting the tower. Its either obscured by the first tower, or the camera is showing the back of the tower. There appears
to only be 1 piece footage showing the actual impact. Having seen it all slowed down etc, it does appear that the plane passes through the tower
before any explosions etc. This is very odd. Also, alot of the commentary suggested the 2 planes had already hit, then the 2nd plane hits the tower
(though with all the confusion and wonder, its probable this is just human error)
As for the hologram theory. Does the technology exist to create holographic images? Yes it does. Does it exist to do it on this scale? Probably. Does
it exist to do it with this kind of complexity? This requires a leap of faith regarding just how far advanced the military is and just not telling us
Can jet fuel burn hot enough to burn steel (even with the presense of other materials) Well, according to various sites, jet fuel burns at around
1700-1800 degrees F. Steel melts at 2500 degrees F. This suggests not.
The other thing that bothers me is that whilst a fireball comes out the other side, there doesn't appear that any part of the plane does. If the
speeds of 500mph are accurate, wouldn't part of it go right through with the kind of momentum/inertia it would have generated?
I'm not totally convinced about the hologram theory but it does merit further investigation on my part
Just my thoughts on this.
[edit on 18-10-2007 by TheJenkster]