It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cris_y2k_se
how can they claim venus if the object does that crazy turn...
great post !!!...i wonder what comes up from this...i wonder if it will make it to main stream media
Italian Astronomers stumble upon UFO on the Moon
Ok this is hitting forums on the net, and the video is quite impressive, some posters on this site im about to link you too, wonder if this would hit mainstream media, so i thought i would highlight this for you.
Thank you for contacting Sky News.
If you have sent in a comment on a news story, please make sure you have
included your name and where you are emailing us from. (We appreciate that
you may have done so already.)
We reserve the right to edit all contributions before broadcast or use on
Originally posted by lee anoma
As most know by now I'm not one to jump to conclusions but this video is very impressive. It does seem to maneuver like a craft and can't be written off as space-ice in my opinion.
You debunkers out there...you can do better than you have on this video. "Maybe it's a craft but prove it's alien!" Classic.
Originally posted by onthefence81
Was you on the "craft"? There is no proof its a craft of any kind lol. Its a shadow of something at the most and thats it.
29 June 2007, hours 09.50
How many times are capitato to feel to speak to us about strange sights, objects that sfrecciano fast crossing the celestial time, unexpected flares in a serene night or fascinating drawn near planetary conjunctions; but for the overwhelming majority draft of natural phenomena scientifically is tried to you. Small percentage of events remains however one that leave a aura mystery their shoulders, in part cleared or scientifically adapts to you.
Recently a our beloved gotten passionate reader astrofilo and of meteorology like many of we, has accidentally captured during one
resumption astronomical video, a "object identified" not R-in.transito on the lunar disc.
We propose you the integral interview to our Alberto reader Mayer, than us illustrer?eglio the phenomenon of which?tato witness,
exposing its opinion to us with respect to the possible nature of the object.
WRITING: then Mr. Alberto Mayer, as it has made to characterize and to resume the appeared mysterious object in skies of the north-west?
ALBERTO: The evening of the 29 you open them, I was proceeding to the putting to fire of one video camera applied to a telescope. The high blowup and the elevated atmospheric turbulence, rendered complicated the procedure than put to fire rather. The image of the Moon appeared tremolante, but I perceived endured the presence of a black dot on the border of our satellite. At the moment I thought was be a matter of soil, present powder particles on the sensor of the video camera. But later on to a pi?ccurata observation I became account that also the dot traslava slowly and introduced the typical distortions produced from the bad one seeing (atmospheric turbulence). To that point I convulsamente began a po' to start the resumption, with the hope to obtain stable images the pi?itide and possible.
WRITING: We can understand the emotion of that moment, the tension to make one moved false, with the risk to lose the collected data and
the knowledge to assist to something of unusual. What has thought, of what could be dealt?
ALBERTO: in before struck I have thought next to a geostazionario satellite in phase of librazione, or to the transit of a sounding balloon for
survey of meteorological data, but at the moment I thought to frame the object in the better possible way, annotating the relative data coordinated you space-thunderstorms.
WRITING: Therefore once carried out the resumption has elaborated the filmato one so as to to render it the pi?efinito one possible. But which conclusions?iunto after to have analyzed to the relative resumption video and data you to the object?
ALBERTO: The first hypothesis, cio?uella of the geostazionario satellite?tata discarded after one first analysis of the data, even if in effects the area in examination coincided with the trajectory of a GeoSync satellite, but they did not square the dimensions, in fact the object must have had the dimensions of approximately a kilometer and the thesis of the satellite was improponibile. The second hypothesis, and cio?l sounding balloon, seemed the pi?lausibile at first, but also in this case, based on trigonometrical calculations, they did not square n?e perspective dimensions and the much less timetable of the sight, too much far away from the launch carried out from the airport bases.
WRITING: Therefore we are of forehead to an object not identified, a possible UFO?
ALBERTO: After years of observations, of nights passed to observe and to photograph the celestial time, I have matured the personal opinion that
the universe could accommodate million if not billions life shapes, from the pi?lementari shapes to those said cosi "intelligent".
The structure of the?ostanzialmente uniform universe and, for how much we know, the stars all obey to the same physical laws and
they possess all the same chemical composition. The present conditions on the Earth, that they have allowed the development of the life from the microbes until we could turn out rare rather, but to allegate ours "unicit?mi seem presuntuoso somewhat. To support the thesis of a rich universe of life however, does not want to say to accept the fact that averse shapes of life run about indisturbate in our skies, with the scope to study, to analyze to us to us, making fun of itself of we with strange designs on the grain or sporadic apparitions, prerogative of little elect ones. Firmly they are convinced that ci?he I have filmato does not have null to that to make with fantascientifici you omit greens in tries of paparazzi.
WRITING: But then of what draft; qual'?a pi?lausibile theory in order to explain such phenomenon?
ALBERTO: Often, when it is found to us of forehead to mysterious facts, they are the pi?emplici explanations to reveal of the true nature.
Supported from the group Astrofili Sheratan that has entusiasticamente asked opinions average world, they have been man hand set aside the satellitari theories, of the sounding balloons and strange flying objects, and?revalsa the hypothesis less pi?mana intriguer but.
To the end of this long vicissitude, it could echo between the public squares of the Italy North I plant deprived of hope of a child who?isto
to escape from the hands its loved balloon. Per?on there?lcuna certainty in merit...
(my mail in-box )
the object only "apparently" changes its path: we can see the change of path if we do not consider that the focus was on the Moon. But, since the Moon was/is NOT still, and the focus was on the Moon, the apparent result is similar to the one of an object which changes path. The object NEVER changed its path: just a few times changed its speed. We debated it some time ago: at the discussion partecipated even the French scientist who discovered one of the newest moons of Saturn: after the discussion and the scientific analysis of the technical data, we assested that it was most likely a balloon which diameter was between 11 and 15 inches, at an altitude of approx 4 miles.
You probably downloaded the excel file in which the data about the subtraction of the movement of the moon is missing.
Originally posted by Mudshark
If the object is a shadow being cast on the surface of a spherical moon, wouldn't we expect the shadow to become increasingly stretched and more elliptical as it gets closer to the horizon?
If you examine the footage at around 1:44 the shadow seems to maintain it's circular appearance.