Hologram dudes, how was it done?, page 2

they didnt need some fancy hologram, they used wood, burlap and rubber.

www.npr.org...

no but seriously. i dont buy the "no plane" theroy. but tactics of this nature have been used to some extent in the past. i think its possible but not not very likely. im interested in seeing where this will go..

Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
However most of us no-planers insist that significant amounts of plane parts would have dropped down outside the building during ‘impact’.

No official NYC personnel observed anything of the kind. Which is why ‘stories’ of plane crashes were only developed gradually.

It almost seems as if you're talking over me as if I'm not 'here'.

Anyways explain how they did this, sign and all:

home.att.net...
That neato smoke effect dissapating from the engine is bigtime hollywood or what?



Honestly, if it's required that I post the rest of the images showing the engine fireball + smoke trail streamer and then the map where it landed lining up with the stream, then you clearly haven't seen enough about the event to make any real judgements.

Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
All the film footage of 9-11 planes — in hindsight — is poorly produced garbage.

Ok, fine, I'll give you that one if you can answer this:
The Hologram Challenge:
What made the 'cartoon cutouts' in the steel side of the buildings? You can add to that the 'thermite'-corner: damage in the South Tower, as well as the 'zipper cut' along the wall leading to it.

Everyone feel free to use my code there to keep that challenge active in this thread or elsewhere until they can actually answer it.


[edit on 26-9-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]

reply to post by jpm1602

---

Exactly. It's subversive disinfo in classic form. For example when I was trying to find engine images the first page with an desirable photo brought up a page that showed over a dozen images of it, abut when you actually read the page they somehow came to the conclusion that it didn't exist, without any actual evidence besides denial. Then the second page borught up a huge quote page of every quote of witnesses seeing the planes, bu tonce again it was a no-planer site using "plane hugger" labeling and rhetoric. The avaerge joe finally finding his way to some 911 sites will see these and say these people are crazy. The more sites like this the higher the odds of Joe ending up in one and being tainted potentially forever. Seeing how Wizard pretends that well established evidence doesn't exist, while talking over mine and others impossible to answer questions -in absolutist language- really makes me queston his motives. Or maybe I'm wrong and he's got all the answers up his sleeve but he's holding back to make us think we have an argument... or he's trying to discredit No-Planers as if they can't answer these questions... Maybe Killtown and his gang was too?

[edit on 26-9-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]

[edit on 26-9-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]

For those of you out there who believe 100% that airplanes did strike the towers, perhaps you should take a look at this video...

live video link

Ever since after I watched this video, I now believe that it was not planes that hit the tower but missiles. It clearly shows that all the footages from news broadcasters of airplanes flying into the towers were all FAKE. One clip even shows a glimpse image of the missile that hit the tower. As for all the witnesses there probably mistaken the missile for a plane. Its not like every day you see missiles flying over your head. Anything of that size, people would probably assume that it was a plane. They probably had no idea what was going on, until they heard from the officials saying that they indeed were planes.



[edit on 26-9-2007 by balon0]

Originally posted by balon0
For those of you out there who believe 100% that airplanes did strike the towers, perhaps you should take a look at this video...

live video link

that just convinced me.. some no name made a short film on how a plane didnt hit twc. that settles it there was no plane.

i must say. it may be possible to fake such a thing, but at best all the evidence you can muster is a handfull of people that throw this lie out there with the main goal of turning you aginst our government. im not just talking bush here but everyone...

reply to post by DaleGribble

---

And in that thread that video's trickery was picked apart.

But I'll answer the first clip example:
The "fade to black" is actually the camera's switch. Then the video maker adds extra black frames to make it stand out. You're watching doctored footage. Blank frames between live camera changes isn't something to extraoridinary. Here you can see the same thing with almost exactly the same cameras:


Don't fall for their TV Trickery.

But even if they were playing with black screens t doesn't prove that planes didn't hit, it could easily mean that it was intentional seeds of disinfo for later use. Meaning the 'perps' could have remotely done some sort of interference to do that effect, then later on if 9/11 COnspiracies gained any ground they could break out a massive disinfo operation as we're seeing happen today, which is doing MAJOR harm to the movement. I have an entire thesis of this intentional diversionary disinfo tactic and many examples, although I don't even use this TV trickery as it isn't solid and believe me I'm looking for all of the choice examples I can get:
www.abovetopsecret.com...'

Flashy screens don't prove planes weren't used. People should shart answering my challenge, and my and others other questions etc before determining anything on thsi matter otherwise it's completely irrational and counterproductive.

[edit on 26-9-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]

9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 16 days ago with 14 member flags

Newest 9/11 Documentary - Proof 9/11 was an inside Job
  Posted 0 days ago with 14 member flags

9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags

An Overview and Debunking of the AE9/11T\'s List of Demolition Signs
  Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags

Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags

new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags

Final Decision: Court sanctions lawyers behind September 11 conspiracy case
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags

Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: