posted on Sep, 26 2007 @ 12:50 AM
I keep hearing that there was no evidence of a plane at the WTC wreckage. From everything I've seen there is also no evidence of any computers,
telephones, office supplies, filing cabinets, desks or anything to indicate that it was in fact an office building. Are we to conclude, based on
this, that it was not an office building either?
I don't know if you've ever been to the WTC but I also didn't see any evidence of escalators, elevators, bathrooms, carpets, lighting fixtures, I
didn't see anything I could attribute to what I've seen inside those buildings. Am I to assume that it wasn't even the WTC?
Look, I respect Mr. Lear and his past career but that doesn't make everything he says right.
There is no way anyone is going to get me to believe that every video and every photo is fake, that every eyewitness is lying and that somehow the
government has this amazing technology that they've never used before or since and that they would've orchestrated this entire ordeal when they
could've just flown two planes into those buildings.
If you can't see that this whole hologram thing is ridiculous then....... I don't even know what, maybe you should turn off the computer and go for