All right...here it is...Bash Clinton all you want here., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 26-1-2004 @ 10:36 AM by TrueLies
"And just think those dangers could have been avoided, but only if we stopped listening to the media idiots that fed us a diet of blow-dried nonsense.

It is the big media and the hack politicians that led us to this nightmarish day.

The media say we shouldn't point fingers. (Funny, isn't it, how the media have spent 30 years pointing fingers at Richard Nixon for his alleged crimes, but when one of their liberal favorites is due for some blame, they feed us the mantras like "Let's move on!" and "No time to point fingers!")Common sense, in fact, dictates that we need to critically examine the people who are to blame for this incident, both the perpetrators (and if you believe Osama bin Laden was the major mastermind behind this, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I want to sell you) and the people we pay to protect us – that is, our national security agencies.

Without question, these agencies failed miserably in preventing this sophisticated, wide-scale and coordinated attack against America.
This operation was ingenious in its simplicity, which would have limited the size (number of people, actions) of the operation and hence detectability. But it could not have been that small for at least a dozen men to hijack four carefully chosen aircraft (routes, fuel load) with carefully coordinated timing. And to get through security with knives big enough to subdue four relatively large crews. If the intell and security systems claim that this challenge is simply too hard for them, they have to be replaced, root and branch. Because this challenge is the challenge. It is now pretty self-evident that claims of reform and adjustment [at the intelligence agencies] to new realities that we've heard over the past eight years or so are hollow."

Of course, it's obvious why the media doesn't want any finger pointing.

Guess who ran the U.S. government and was responsible for our national security for the past eight years?

Yes, you got it: Bill Clinton


The Clintons were supported vociferously by the media through the worst imaginable scandals. throughout that period, Bill Clinton's personal corruption was wholesale and mirrored how he was corrupting America's national security.

During eight years, Clinton decimated America's military. Our forces were cut almost in half under his stewardship.

Research and development on all new weapons systems were brought almost to a halt as other nations continued to build. Clinton destroyed nearly our entire arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons. Monsters like Saddam flourished as Clinton bombed aspirin factories, tent cities in Afghanistan and worthless radar stations in the Iraqi desert.

But Clinton, the ever clever bastard, was more insidious. Little, systematic changes were undertaken to destroy America's intelligence agencies."

And there you go.





reply posted on 26-1-2004 @ 10:51 AM by TrueLies
Want more discusting information on the bill clinton era?

Here's some disturbing

Clinton and Women: [Part 1]

stories.
www.newsmax.com...
a=1998/10/25/175658

Clinton and Women: [Part 2]

www.newsmax.com.../10/27/64122


Arkansas' Murderous Ways

www.newsmax.com.../10/22/05948


Clinton Harem Tied to White House Database Scandal

www.newsmax.com.../10/16/51313

Clinton-Connected Bribes, Break-ins, Beatings, Death Threats

www.newsmax.com.../10/12/52542

Monica Backs Perot on Clinton Drug Charge

www.newsmax.com.../10/7/62808

Tripp Tape 'Doctored' where Monica Speaks of Death Fears

www.newsmax.com.../10/6/61744

Blumenthal Testimony: "Darkness at Noon"; A Threatening Call From Clinton?;

www.newsmax.com...=1998/10/4/160807

Go to archives if you wanna see more.


reply posted on 26-1-2004 @ 01:12 PM by OXmanK
Because GW is the current Sucker in Charge of this great country. My reasons for starting this sentiment that just because someone else #ed up something in the past does not give next person in line to do the same thing. Example, "We do not approve of the invasion of Iraq"; Retort, "Well your man Clinton tried the same thing." Justifying something wrong with something else that was wrong is the worst and flimsiest statement. Also, it keeps the debate to centralized theme. Bringing it whereever you want to just to point out that someone is a hypocrit is dodging the issue. WRONG IS WRONG. I don't care who perpetrated it first or if someone in the past that I may like did the same damn thing...WRONG IS STILL WRONG. Nothing will change that statement. I would love to see people stick to the issue and figure out which is wrong and which is right. This goes for both sides of the argument.

BTW, I am a Clinton fan, but it is not his politics that I am a fan of. But I still point blame where it is due. He #ed up alot of things and I give the lil-devil credit for it. Perhaps I'm the only one here who does. I would just love to see some debate about GW without seeing "You mornical douchebaggish hypocrit. Clinton did this, that and the other thing and that makes you a mornical douchebaggish hypocrit" or a Clinton bash-based post that reads something like "You bible-thumpin', gay oppressin, rapist/murderer of Africa CONservative Repugnant asshole hypocrit didn't like when Clinton did this, that, and the other thing but praise Bush for doing this, that, and the other thing. Damn bully, cheap labor conservative Repugnant hypocritical hippopotamus." Granted this is the damned mud-pit, but it has gone from cheap zingers to childish antics and debate styles on both sides. With that being said, I must bid you all farewell and goodbye. See ya'll after work.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Internet as a case study of Socialism
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
The Greenbay Packer\'s Prove That Socialism Works.
  Posted 18 days ago with 5 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags