It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by krankinkx
I must admit that I have not. I just have come, in a very short period of time, to the conclusion that if colon-el is against it then odds are it's OK to most normal people.
Originally posted by krankinkx
I must admit that I have not. I just have come, in a very short period of time, to the conclusion that if colon-el is against it then odds are it's OK to most normal people.
Originally posted by Colonel
I want you all to see this mindset of the repugnant and the story on this thread. I really want you all to see the mindset of the real repugnant.
Originally posted by krankinkx
Who said it was a joke. I don't remember saying it was a joke. Maybe colon-el told you it was a joke.
Originally posted by Colonel
Watch as the repugnant suffers an anxiety attack for looking like his normal self in public---dumb, turning frantic to the point of nuerotic. Soon, expect wild accusations and belliegerent statements directed at your humble moderator.
Originally posted by krankinkx
Now I have read colon-el's excerpt from the article, and going out on a limb here and assuming he hasn't misrepresented the truth, I think if the guy compromised National Security he should be Imprisoned for life.
Just like those members of the Clinton administration should have been when they allowed the N. Koreans to obtain classified Nuclear information!
Originally posted by krankinkx
Just like those members of the Clinton administration should have been when they allowed the N. Koreans to obtain classified Nuclear information!
Originally posted by OXmanK
I thought it was the Chinese who got their hands on the top secret nuclear information.
Originally posted by kramtronix
colonel, just remember... With out Democrat Clinton, there would have been no 9/11.
Originally posted by Colonel
But, we generally tend not to be criminals or have criminal tenedencies. We don't relish in the murder and death of those that don't look like us. And, we aren't imbued with the spirit of Cain which allows a repugnant to lose his humanity and spit on those who are less fortuante so long as he has his.
Originally posted by junglejake
Originally posted by Colonel
But, we generally tend not to be criminals or have criminal tenedencies. We don't relish in the murder and death of those that don't look like us. And, we aren't imbued with the spirit of Cain which allows a repugnant to lose his humanity and spit on those who are less fortuante so long as he has his.
riiiiiiiiiiight.....
Edit:
Boy, when I read that, and burst out laughing, everyone in my office ran over here to see what I was looking at that was so funny. lol However, most of them walked away when they saw it was political. (I tend to be a little outspoken at work, having that new democratic symbol on my desk and all)
[Edited on 1-22-2004 by junglejake]
Originally posted by McGotti
Originally posted by kramtronix
colonel, just remember... With out Democrat Clinton, there would have been no 9/11.
hahahahahaha...and how did you come across that info??? Are you actually so foolish that you think that simply catching osama would have ended the radical islamic movement??.....thats a joke!!!! osama didnt mastermind the attack!! he is just one of the leaders!