posted on Sep, 24 2007 @ 05:51 PM
Originally posted by Freedom ERP
If we accept John Lear’s statement that there are bases on the moon, why would Bush announce the intention to land again publicly on the moon?
You should talk to Zorgon about this, and check out some of his threads.
It will be very helpful to answer some of you questions..
For this statement I can answer.. The moon is a pretty big place too.. And there many areas on the moon where you could land, and do some photos
without showing any bases on the moon..
However I am very curious what they will do about the sky on the moon.
For just once in my life I would like to see non altered photo of a photo from the moon surface. Ive researched and read that it is void of
atomsphere, and would only be a black sky.. I have also read and researched the sky as being a dull grey. And many other theroies..
These could simply be laided to rest if NASA was more honest with us..
But they are not clearly.. This is why there are so many "theories". NASA isnt being straight with us.. Our government is not being straight with
Thus you get what we have here..
I try not to put much stock into any theory.. Yet I keep them for my research, and you will find they are great tools, for expanding the process you
use to find whats really going on up there..
Will the average man ever know? I sure hope one day we will be granted that right.. Untill then, we just keep on thinking of new ideas and possible
[edit on 24-9-2007 by zysin5]