reply to post by lurk0more
Well I googled the 390 Benmar one hit was a guy referring to some Simon Grey COINTELPRO conspiracy, the problem is it is impossible to know if this is
just a smear campaign.
I personally only evaluate them on there post and how they run the site, it is really hard to speculate on what is credible or not when you start
getting into he said she said things.
Could you expand more on what you meant by your post, I am not understanding its intent. Or what you are saying. I will go read that ladies blog,
but so far it is equally unclear and has lots of pages to read.
Does this mean anything? The words in quotes?
ok I read her blog(the lady linked from the google hit on address about simon conspiracy), she don't like ATS at all.
Her claims that they are trying to maximize revenue and google hits are possible, but this goes against them having any inside track with anyone so if
anything it frees them from accusations on being bumped by powers that be, if that is even done.
Her comments about them using user comments for monetary gain, well when we post we know synthesis of info can occur, it does not seem dishonest to
Sure I buy into them thinking of us as people supplying there business not as friends, I would even go so far as to think they may have Elite/Commoner
Now her comments on point system I agree, that sets up an elite system here, where people are chosen by mods to join it, so that is horrible in all
ways, and shows a form of thinking, a perpetuation of classisum and even an embrace of secrecy, something I abhor.
Oh her comments about slander campaigns, gang stalking and slander campaigns happen all the time, I actually though "all bite the dog bitten" might
just be such an event. Not sure if it is orchestrated here, that would be presumptuous.(oh also in one interpretation the image with the circles also
represents "all bite the dog bitten") I do not use this phrase as any form of call for a stalking or anything just to be sure nobody thinks that.
I figure everyone add input, mention when you are speculation, and try to stick to the material, not the people, after all all we know about people is
the material we see from them. heh, and in the case of slander campaigns that is not even true.
That's my thoughts on the lady you mentioned from her first blog page.
I do think they could do more to foster less ignorantance, I have seen better systems where people can find responses to there posts easier, and also
a list of highest flags/to views page would be nice, so you can see the threads people liked more always at the top of a list. The constant rolling
off of good threads is sad, I bet there is a ton of good info sitting in the archives but because it is not in front of people they may never see it.
This is a standard silent weapon, do not censor, just keep the good stuff in the back of the room high up on a shelf, where nobody will notice it.
(If this is intentional they are willing ammo in disinformation and use of a silent weapon, but there may be other motivating factors also)
Of coarse meeting the movers and shakers of the media world, they will be offered a ring of power if they do not already wear one. But each person
choose what they want to do and how they chose to act, that is freedom, and it is not for anyone to judge. But we can all hope.
I am back on a soap box me thinks, If someone sees a person being insulted by many, be extra thoughtfull of what they say, avoid the peer preasure and
read the logic of what they type, don't give weight to emotional slurs. That is what I try, and often fail, to do.
[edit on 21-10-2007 by Redge777]