This has been my main focus for at least two weeks now (don’t tell the Boss), and also lots of midnight oil as well. After a couple hundred hours,
I was hoping to present a viable solution set, but the quarry has evaded. Since we are only 17 days or so from November 5th, and it appears no one
will come close enough soon enough to “win” an invitation to NYC at their own expense, I’m going to share what I have as you all have done –
and perhaps we can beat the clock and reach some consensus on a most probable approximation. It’s what ATS is best at and you folks are the best of
the best. Incidentally, one of things I did, thanks to all of you, was to build a “document of clues” to refer to while working on this. In
other words, I simply cut out and pasted into a Word doc ONLY the viable-sounding clues, hints, tips, and any other pertinent fact that might help
guide me to a solution. I also inserted my own observations, comments, and feedback into the document to keep me organized. As of today this
document is an incredible 15 pages long – and still growing! I would advise anyone serious about this to consider doing the same – it really
helps not having to sift through insignificant (but good-natured) ramblings, multiple pages loading, all of the ‘window dressing’ on each post –
stuff like that. So where am I presently?
First off – there is no avoiding making several assumptions when trying to solve the cipher character string given to us by His ATS Eminence – our
very own Skeptic Overlord. My approach was to assume a few imponderables, and then proceed until exhausted before moving on to the next one. Before
I talk about the cipher, however, I must say some of you have done some great work on the “spheres”. Like many of you, I extracted everything I
could from the sphere graphic, and SO has succeeded in obscuring the individual sphere labels quite well. I’ve run the graphic through several
beefy software packages, enhanced and modified and pixel-analyzed until I’m blue in the face. I even blew the image as sharp as I could get it onto
a large screen in the office with a hi-res, hi-ratio overhead projector – it was no use. The closest I got was applying a 3D extrusion routine to
the labels (looks like some of you have done that as well), then flipped it to a negative, and then embossed the result. BTW – thanks Vic for the
focusing tip: wish it could actually perform the magic its name implied. OK – now for our little word puzzle:
My first assumption was that we are dealing with a straight character string, no spaces or punctuation to consider, at least at the outset, and that
by laying out the ciphers in several configurations, one might detect a pattern from which to continue study. Using the CIA Kryptos model mentioned
earlier (seemed like an appropriate one to try), I placed the string in a spreadsheet, one character per cell, then shifted down and over, and
repeated the string for several iterations, and then examined and played with the result to see what might emerge.
I did the same thing with the character string in reverse, since several posters in the thread seemed to agree that the string, especially considering
SO’s punctuation, looked more promising backwards than forwards. I also attempted alternating the strings both forwards and backwards, looking for
vertical spelling, diagonal spellings, even hunted for spirals and unusual configurations (e.g., spelling “A – T – S”) etc. Below is a sample
of this early in progress.
I next concentrated on a simple anagram substitution exercise, but needed to determine, like many of you, whether SO was including spaces between his
“words” as an indicator of actual word-letter counts in the solution, or if he was scrambling to entire string and just throwing spaces in there
to throw us off. Obviously, solving for hidden words in the entire string without limitations of a one-to-one correlation between the given string
and the solution, though presenting its own challenges, is easier than trying to find a logical grouping as given. Particularly vexing was the
absence of any words with fewer than three letters! The 11 words to work with (1@10 letters, 1@9, 3@8, 2@7, 1@6, 2@5, and 1@3 letters) meant that
except for “the”, “ATS” or perhaps a few others, we were going to be severely impacted in the cadence and semantics possibilities in finding a
solution. And, as I’m sure many of you now appreciate, we also need to make a boatload of assumptions for keywords. I’m in agreement with most
of you that certain words have better odds of appearing than others, so I went with what looked and sounded best with the few clues we have and
languished from there. Words like “revolution”, “imagine”, “digital”, “ATS”, were reasonable staring points and the exercise simply
meant many hours of plugging other appropriate choices into the remaining slots until a meaningful sentence was formed. A portion of my worksheet
performing this exercise in the early stages is below. This, like the remaining methods, all assumed that there was a direct correlation between the
given letters in the ciphered text and the corresponding letter in the ultimate solution (just like the Hotel cipher “clue” a few pages back. In
other words, because there is only one “R” for example in the cipher string, once used in a solution word, it was then verboten from being used
again in the remaining deciphered word attempts.
Finally, mostly to break some of the monotony and drudgery of extracting word-for-word potential solutions from the above method, I also attempted an
anagram extraction using the entire string of 76 letters. This was the most fun, but I still don’t think I have anything definitive. My guess is
that when we finally are privileged enough to be appropriately ‘enlightened’, that we’ll discover many of the words were included, and we were
tripped up by a few obscure additions that impacted our remaining letter choice. Like some of you, I’m sure, I didn’t simply plow through a
dictionary for I never would have made it as far doing so, even though I often felt like the SETI@home crowd, forever crunching endless possibilities
to ultimately just being teased to an inconclusive end.
The iterative anagram algorithm in the spreadsheet is just a simple RDBMS routine that has a VB front-end that compares a potential deciphered
extraction to a word list, removes the word from the ciphered string, presents you with remaining letters and a letter/word count, upon which the
process is repeated. Simple as that sounds, it is by no means definitive or easy. The table below shows the process using just one iteration set:
So, with this trial, I have an “N” left over after coming up with a semi-sensible sentence like, “IMAGINE A REVOLUTION IN GLOBAL DIGITAL
CONTENT, DENIED EFFECTS…” yadda yadda – this one certainly isn’t it. But you can see that there is a methodology to the deciphering. I start
with a library of words that can be made out of the 76 given letters –in this case, 112,613 English words in the database can be deciphered. After
entering “Revolution”, I have 66 letters remaining, and a possible 56, 911 words that can be extracted from the remaining letters. And so on.
Well, using this method, I put together a bunch of sentences. IMO, some of the best ones were especially disappointing at the end when it became
evident that I would have a consonant or two left over – essentially nullifying that trial. The table below shows a piece of the solution set I was
coming up with:
Of course, as is obvious by now, most trials used what I affectionately refer to now as some of “my favorite words” (“imagine”,
“revolution”, “ATS”, etc). Like some of you, I kept going back to the same first few choices (as you’ll see below). It’s just as
possible, of course, likely even, that we’re all barking up trees in the wrong forest altogether, and most of these words are not in the solution at
all. That would be sad, since we are all trudging along with the same set of meager “clues” and these choices seem logical, eh Watson? In any
case, for those that want to have a crack at it – here are some of the better solutions, all of which manage to use all of the exact same 76
original letters in the cipher string. You may find the results amusing – I know I couldn’t help but laugh with what I was left to choose from
after getting 80-90% through a trial:
A GLOBAL EVOLUTION IN LIVE DIGITAL CONTENT - ATS PSYCHE-EFFECT DIMENSIONS; UNDENY IGNORANCE
IMAGINE - ATS BINDS ETHICALLY SPLENDENT “DENY IGNORANCE” EVOLUTION - COST EFFACING REVOLUTION
GEE, A GLOBAL REVOLUTION IN LIVE DIGITAL CONTENT - AN INFINITE SECONDHAND ECOSYSTEM SYNC UP!
INVITE AN EVOLUTION: GLOBAL DIGITAL SUM CONTENT SCIENCES - ATS DENY IGNORANCE; HYPED OFFLINE
I USE PLANNING EFFICIENTLY, ENABLING US ADVANCED DIGITAL CONTENT ECOSYSTEM - SOHO REVOLUTION
PINNACLE BLOG ATS SHUFFLES REVOLUTION -IMAGINE, SYNDICATED CONTENT. I LOVE IT! DENY IGNORANCE
ATS FETCHES GLOBAL SYNC UP EVOLUTION IN LIVE DIGITAL DIMENSION CONTENT - DENY IGNORANCE FEAST
GLOBAL SPONTANEOUS REVOLUTION IN LIVE DIGITAL EFFECTS SYNCED CONTENT, IMAGINE - NICE, HANDY
DISTINCTIVE FELONS BEGAN HYPED CONTENT -IMAGINE FULL SOCIAL EVOLUTION, ATS, DENY IGNORANCE
DEFINE GLOBAL EVOLUTION SYNCHING MEDIA ACCESS DIGITAL CONTENT ATS REVOLUTION - FINE PENNY
IMAGINE PINNACLE BLOG: ATS SHUFFLES SYNDICATED REVOLUTION CONTENT. I LOVE IT! DENY IGNORANCE…
And this one is kind of cool, only because of the acronym made from the remaining letters at the end (“NYPD”):
IMAGINE A GLOBAL REVOLUTION IN LIVE DIGITAL CONTENT INFINITE ENHANCED ECOSYSTEMS FOCUS; 4,0 -NYPD
In any case, I’m sure none of these are correct – they just sound too goofy. And I wasn’t able to use some of my better choices for potential
words (e.g., “”LISTEN”, “MEDIA”, etc.) at least not so far, because when I plugged them in it more quickly reduced the good potential in the
remaining words in the database. Clearly, however, if I abandoned a “favorite” word or two, I can utilize these instead. Another problem was
that the distribution of vowels made it very difficult to distribute them among a logical grouping of words. Especially if you start using small
words, like “A”, “AN”, to any degree, it eats up your remaining vowel choices and your left with a bucket of stand-alone consonants. Not
good.
So there you have it. My work thus far. I sure hope one of my sharp ATS buddies on this thread can use some of this info – perhaps build off of it
some more. I’m always amazed at the resourcefulness and brain power of my ATS compatriots – keep up the good work. One of us will win an
invitation – and if not: well then we can all toast each other from home for giving it our strong ATS best!
[edit on 10/20/2007 by Outrageo]