John, after the aircraft hit the trade centres, you can easily see the engines smash right through the towers and keep on going, where they would land
onto a street.
The engine (s) were photographed on the ground. Were these engines planted, fakes, or holograms?
If a plane made mostly of steel could not make much of a pentatration into the reinforced conrete wall, how could a plane made mostly of
aluminum travel throgh the walls and collums of the Pentagon?
Probably because the Pentagon wasn't made from a reactor containment vessel, a 757 is five times the size of a F4, and the F4 actually IS made from
aluminium.
This is not true. If it descended 3000 feet in 30 seconds that would be 6000 feet per minute. Even if the airplnane were capable of such a
maneuver, 30 seconds would not be enough time for the acceleration to 500 mph.
Please explain to me how an 767 could NOT decend at 6000 feet per minute.
Oh, and explain how a 747 (China Airlines flight 006) descended 30,000 ft in under two and a half minutes.
Therefor the friction caused by said speed at said altitude on said plane is not obtainable. Here is a clip from a 767 spec sheet, * DO NOT
Exceed 250kts @ or Below 10,000ft Altitude.* . Here is a link to that site. www.curbe.com... . I'd check it out.
Please read the thread again.
Still 350knts is only around 403 mph. Not 550+mph. So you still prove nothing. You have no proof contradicting what Boeing employees or that
engineer stated. So all your doing is restating your opinion louder then before. That still doesn't explain how that 767 got to 550+mph at 700 foot
atltitude.
Well, first, that Boeing engineer stated the aircraft would break apart at 220mph, which is factually, a complete lie. At sealevel the speed at which
an aircraft is limited to (350knots in 767 as per earlier (VNE)) is limited at that speed because the
risk of structural failure, due to calculated
factors such as wing or tail deformation or due to aeroelastic 'flutter' (unstable airframe or control oscillation). Yep, RISK. Meaning if you
hit turbulence or wern't careful at that speed, you run the RISK of smashing the airframe to tiny little bits.
Let's look at history too, eh? China Airlines Flight 006. It decended 30,000 ft in under two and a half minutes, thought to many to break the sound
barrier. After recovery, the plane landed. When decending at an average of 15000 feet per minute, how is the plane NOT going to get WAY above VNE?
en.wikipedia.org...
FedEx Flight 705, the aircraft had an attempted hijacking, and one of the pilots left temple had been hit with a hammer. He could barely move, so with
the only weapon he had, he litterally did aerobatics in the aircraft. It is thought to of came very close to the sound barrier. The plane landed and
flies with Fedex to this day.
en.wikipedia.org...
On a clear, sunny, day probably with little turbulence, how the hell is a 767 decending at three times the normal rate (6000fpm vs 2000fpm) with
engines FIREWALLED NOT going to hit 500mph without breaking apart? It's happened in the past.
Yep, an aircraft hit the World Trade Centres, not only because there was video evidence, but because there were engines laying on a street not to far
from Ground zero, not to mention there were thousands of eye witnesses. Yet if anyone ever brings up this proof against someones agenda, they usually
dismiss the aircraft as holograms, witnesses brainwashed, engines planted.... airliners disapearing... and so on. If anyone tells them the technology
isn't there, then they will say; 'no, it's secret government technology!1.
HOLOGRAMS!!1111ONEONEONEONEONEONEONEONE2ONE.
[edit on 25/9/07 by JimmyCarterIsSmarter]
