Originally posted by xenomorph07
At the onset,i would like to apologize if this video has been posted before because i havent gone through all of the posts,but if it hasnt,i think
everyone in here will will find it pretty interesting and,possibly,even incriminating.
You be the judge
i think if what has been shown IS true(leaving aside the eye-witness accounts) then i think the powers-that-be have to answer to a lot of questions
Thanks for posting this link. You are obviously seeking the truth, as are many people.
Apart from the irritating & unnecessary thumping music which accompanies this compilation of tired old misinformation, it deliberately omits a pile of
inconvenient evidence which disproves the lie it wants you to believe.
To review an analysis of the debris from the Boeing 757-200 recovered after the plane crashed into the Pentagon, see:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
To view the testimony of 200 or so of the known 700+ eyewitness accounts from people in Washington that day who observed Boeing 757-200 flight #77
from Dulles, with their own eyes, either diving into the Pentagon or impacting the building, see
www.geocities.com...
If you want to believe the guy featured on the video who mistook the 757 for a commuter jet (they are both aircraft and both have 2 engines) then you
can believe that if you choose. But he was clearly mistaken. Hundreds of other eyewitness correctly identified the aircraft they were looking at as a
757, or at least as a commercial airliner. The only debris at the site was from the 757-200, which is what eyewitnesses saw. No wreckage from any
other aircraft was observed by any known witness, which is pretty conclusive.
To believe this preposterous, invented nonsense, you have to explain what happened to flight #77 and all the passengers and crew. Making up some
rubbish about it being shot down somewhere is not evidence. Where? By whom? How? Witnesses, wreckage, testimony, PROOF please. None exists, so far as
I am aware. The only evidence that exists about flight #77 is that it was constantly tracked by ATC until flown into The Pentagon.
Hani Hanjour qualified as a pilot in 1999 and had reportedly done about 200 hours on various aircraft including a 757 simulator. He would have been
quite capable of piloting a 757 into a fixed building. Well, the evidence is there in front of you. He did. I have only 66 hours in my logbook, and
have never flown a multi-engined jet, but I reckon I could do it easy. Most amateur pilots could. For a not-too-experienced but definitely not a
novice pilot, who is determined enough, targeting and hitting a large fixed building with a large aircraft would be pretty easy, much easier than, for
example, landing it on an airport runway which involves far greater care and skill (and which by the way thousands of pilots do every day).
Temporary confiscation of any CCTV video taken at or near a crime scene is SOP with every police force everywhere in the world, and always has been so
far as I am aware. There is nothing 'sinister' about it. It may reveal vital evidence. None of these videos had been filming in the direction of The
Pentagon on the day, so they don't show anything. They've all been released back to the owners you can view them if you can be bothered.
Because some people don't like the Bush administration, and want to invent conspiracies to incriminate it in defiance of all the evidence, doesn't
make the fantasy true. I don't like them either, but all the evidence I have ever seen demonstrates conclusively and without doubt that Boeing
757-200 AA flight #77 was hijacked and used as a missile to strike the Pentagon on 9/11/2001, as part of the 4-planes operation. If anyone can ever
produce any evidence to the contrary which stands up to even basic analysis, I would be delighted to see it.
