Can a 767 Fly 500MPH @ 700ft Altitude? Boeing Official Says: Ha Ha Ha! Not a Chance!, page 13
Pages: <<  10    11    12    13    14    15    16  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 30-9-2007 @ 07:40 PM by TrevorALan
Originally posted by CB_Brooklyn


Please link to a 9/11 video that shows a "plane" **descending**...


OK, heres one, form a conspiracy theorist in fact.
www.youtube.com...
Now this person seems to think it is an "F-16" or something, I'll argue that point another day, but you can clearly see from the long shot that the plane was in a SHARP descent until almost the very end. I believe this is a view from the north or north east. I wish I could get raw video but its proof that such aview exists.

I think this also shows the plane descending, less obviously, but again a conspiracy believer posted it so you can't say I faked it.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3AwEz0K-UI

And here is a flight controller telling us how fast he tracked the aircraft descending
www.youtube.com...


reply posted on 30-9-2007 @ 08:01 PM by CB_Brooklyn
reply to post by hikix




Your comment is not descriptive. It's also hearsay and is not admissible in a Court of Law.


reply posted on 30-9-2007 @ 08:31 PM by hikix
reply to post by CB_Brooklyn



Heresy to you, fact to me.... maybe if there is a trial, ill conduct some interviews... um, where were you again?


reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 03:55 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by justin-d



Awesome, except there were windows on the WTC, glass can't stop much:




reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 03:56 PM by Boone 870
reply to post by ULTIMA1



ULTIMA1

I don't think that the F-4 is made mostly of steel. Do you have any sources for that? I can't think of any aircraft made mostly of steel.


reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 04:35 PM by justin-d
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
2. The F-4 is mostly made of steel. The 757 is mostly made of aluminum. So we are supposed to believe that a plane made from steel could not penatrate a wall but plane made of aluminum could go through the outer wall, the reinforced collums, the interior walls and punch through the outer wall.


I'm not asking you to believe it - do the math. All I'm asking you to believe are the laws of physics. The reason I posted it was to show that even if it were constructed as solidly as a nuclear bunker - something it could not penetrate - that it would not simply bounce off.

The trade centers weren't solid structures either:



The planes could have been made of cheese - if you get them going fast enough they'll hit with the force of an explosion. Steel isn't any sort of wolverine-eque, impermeable adamantium material either - it will happily break just like anything else if you apply enough force and impact. Get a heavy steel mesh from your local hardware/diy store and see what kinds of materials you can break it with. You could put a piece of wood through it if you wanted to. That's basically what the towers were - big meshes of steel with a heavy core that held the majority of the structure up like a spine.

Consider an explosion itself. When you detonate a brick of C4, you're basically turning it into a ball of expanding gas. That's carbon dioxide and water vapour which, because they are moving fast enough, can destroy steel, concrete, or whatever else you like. The hardness of the material means nothing - what matters is the energy density it is carrying.


[edit on 1/10/2007 by justin-d]
Pages: <<  10    11    12    13    14    15    16  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags