Originally posted by warlock3638
I so much agree with you. Even the morons that have posted threads and replys saying its cost us a trillion dollars and etc.
They might be morons but they also happen to be 'right'.
What would've it cost if we had Al Gore as President.
A trillion dollars give or take a few a few hundred million.
Several thousand citizens here in America, and several Billion if not trillion dollars damage these nuts cases could've caused.
What would they have used to kill seven thousands American citizens when they had not killed as much as one American citizen before? Have you found
any evidence that Bush and co never managed to?
There was WMD in Iraq.
Only the one's the US gave Iraq and dismantled in the early 1990's with the help of various international agencies!
Just like all the other nuts here they can't see past their Democrat noses. You Liberals want to see America fall, you want us to be over
This is hardly a democrat/conservative thing and if you still think about it in those terms your nose must be of quite imposing scale! I am not sure
how many of those who wish to destroy America are in fact liberal but Bush and the gang are quite actively doing so and certainly not liberal!
Well if we were you and I wouldn't be able to talk about it here or on the street. Think dummies. America could destroy Iraq if we wanted.
I think the 2-3 million Iraqi's that's died as result of Americn actions since 1990 shows just how good the US national security people are at
destroying Iraq and , more specifically, Iraqi's.
We could destroy the Taliban.
Sure 'you' could so why aren't 'you' and more importantly why did 'you' fund them into existence in the first place?
We could destroy Iran easily. But economics in the world would be very hard on us.
Sure 'you' could but how is that going to defend the US against a Iranian threat that simply does not exist?
We don't want to kill good people that want to better their lives. We want to keep the terroists over there and fight them there. Wake up!!
You that talk about us being defeated are uninformed fools. Even those in the Military that think this way are uninformed cooks.
Because those in the know don't really know! Zaphod seems to almost always be on the other side of a argument with me but his right when he claims
that logic is dead.
Thank god we went to Iraq and thank god for Our Military.
Why would you thank god for the deaths of so many tens of thousands of Americans to say nothing of the millions of Iraqi's? Do you really believe
that Dubya did this on God's command as he so likes claiming?
God Bless America. People like HILLARY and OBAMA need to be brought up on Treason. And so should you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I doubt god has ever blessed the US as American citizens had to fight tooth and nail for EVERY right they ever gained in that place. I am not very
familiar with Obama's record but i am pretty sure that Hillary will join Dubya in whichever hell is heading for.
Originally posted by warlock3638
To make a statement about the WW2 comments. Germany could've won the war easily if they had taken the Crimea and the Middle east.
Given that they could reliable gain victories against France and the low countries and actually succeed to take Moscow they might have had sufficient
forces free to stage such a assault somewhere in late 42. Britain did still have capable forces in the ME so it wont have been easy and the US might
have been forced to become involved far earlier and more seriously.
If Hilter, which thank god he didn't, had listened to Rommel he would've beat Russia without a major conflict.
The Germans caught the Russians with their pants far down and even without managing to take Moscow i think they did as good as could be expected
against such a powerful armed force. If the Germans attacked a year, or even six months, earlier or later things would in my opinion have gone very
Their are several books that spell it out. America could've helped prolong the war but they could not have stopped them by their selves.
Germany were not going to be able to stage a invasion against Britain any time soon with or without a pacified Russia and i think we would just have
had a cold war of a different kind.
Britton would not have carried on without the Suez Canal.
With Canada, India and Australia still there they could probably have gone on with or without the Suez given American financial support...
They would not have stood a chance.
What were the Germans going to do after their brief invasion window passed in July and August 1940?
Russia almost signed a treaty with Hilter anyway, even after they were attacked and pushed back.
They almost did in 1943 just before the summer campaign season as they were well bloodied and wanted to see where the Germans stood. As proved evident
later they did in fact have a good grip of the situation but were always playing for the time that were always going to benefit them more.
I am still not sure how serious those negotiations were and if either part at the table really had the authority to make a deal to postpone the
fighting for very long or at all.
Its called self preservation.
The Germans were having the worse of it for sure but they were not entirely down and out hence the fact that there were talks at all. Evidently both
sides felt they could still gain the superiority that both were seriously bleeding for and this was proved accurate by just how close run a thing that
summer season turned out to be.