A few thoughts for those who think engaging Iran militarily would be disastrous for America, page 11
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13    14  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 05:42 PM by WraothAscendant
reply to post by Voxel



Umm VOxel. Don't know about the others but after Rome fell we had the Dark Ages then the middle ages and both was hardly better off.


reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 08:30 PM by mattifikation
Our Aegis systems can't hit the Sunburn, but our missiles can.


The SS-N-22 has a semi-deserved reputation as being an uninterceptible superweapon. This is because it is a sea-skimming missile, which makes it hard to detect until rather close range, and it is supersonic, which shortens an adversary's reaction time. It was, in fact, designed to counter the USA's AEGIS combat system and other systems like it - but in practice, it's only slightly harder to intercept. First, it flies at a much higher altitude than most other sea-skimming missiles, about 60 meters rather than the 5-10 meters that missiles like Harpoon, Tomahawk, Exocet, Penguin and Kormoran fly at. Second, although it pulls random evasive maneuvers during its final attack stage, it is still a large target with a huge RF and infrared signature. In tests, numerous air defense weapons including the AMRAAM, Standard, Evolved Sea Sparrow, Aster 30, SA-N-6 Grumble, SA-N-9 Gauntlet and Rolling Airframe Missile have intercepted either live SS-N-22 missiles, or drones replicating their performance.


everything2.com...

Or, if you're interested in our specific answer to the Sunburn, there is the seaRAM missile:


"In 10 scenarios, real Anti-Ship Missiles and supersonic Vandal target missiles (Mach 2.5) were intercepted and destroyed under realistic conditions. RAM Block 1 achieved first-shot kills on every target in its presented scenarios, including sea-skimming, diving and highly maneuvering profiles in both single and stream attacks."

"With these test firings RAM demonstrated its unparalleled success against today's most challenging threats. Cumulatively to date more than 180 missiles have been fired against anti-ship missiles and other targets, achieving a success rate over 95%"

The SeaRAM is a drop in replacement for the Phalanx system. The RAM missle itself is a mach 2, second generation derivative of the Sidewinder and Stinger missles. It features BOTH infrared and radar based target tracking, allowing for use against future low radar cross section (stealthy) anti-ship missles.


www.freerepublic.com...

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Sunburn is not invincible. At any rate, I'm sure anti-ship missiles will be among the first targets to be attacked, and we can launch aircraft from nearby land airports until the Sunburn threat is neutralized.

And no, I do not think we SHOULD attack Iran. I do not think we could AFFORD to attack Iran. The problem with economical arguments is that the money doesn't become an issue until *AFTER* we've dropped all the bombs.



reply posted on 25-9-2007 @ 09:25 PM by FaxMachine
Originally posted by mattifikation
Our Aegis systems can't hit the Sunburn, but our missiles can.


The SS-N-22 has a semi-deserved reputation as being an uninterceptible superweapon. This is because it is a sea-skimming missile, which makes it hard to detect until rather close range, and it is supersonic, which shortens an adversary's reaction time. It was, in fact, designed to counter the USA's AEGIS combat system and other systems like it - but in practice, it's only slightly harder to intercept. First, it flies at a much higher altitude than most other sea-skimming missiles, about 60 meters rather than the 5-10 meters that missiles like Harpoon, Tomahawk, Exocet, Penguin and Kormoran fly at. Second, although it pulls random evasive maneuvers during its final attack stage, it is still a large target with a huge RF and infrared signature. In tests, numerous air defense weapons including the AMRAAM, Standard, Evolved Sea Sparrow, Aster 30, SA-N-6 Grumble, SA-N-9 Gauntlet and Rolling Airframe Missile have intercepted either live SS-N-22 missiles, or drones replicating their performance.


everything2.com...

Or, if you're interested in our specific answer to the Sunburn, there is the seaRAM missile:


"In 10 scenarios, real Anti-Ship Missiles and supersonic Vandal target missiles (Mach 2.5) were intercepted and destroyed under realistic conditions. RAM Block 1 achieved first-shot kills on every target in its presented scenarios, including sea-skimming, diving and highly maneuvering profiles in both single and stream attacks."

"With these test firings RAM demonstrated its unparalleled success against today's most challenging threats. Cumulatively to date more than 180 missiles have been fired against anti-ship missiles and other targets, achieving a success rate over 95%"

The SeaRAM is a drop in replacement for the Phalanx system. The RAM missle itself is a mach 2, second generation derivative of the Sidewinder and Stinger missles. It features BOTH infrared and radar based target tracking, allowing for use against future low radar cross section (stealthy) anti-ship missles.


www.freerepublic.com...

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Sunburn is not invincible. At any rate, I'm sure anti-ship missiles will be among the first targets to be attacked, and we can launch aircraft from nearby land airports until the Sunburn threat is neutralized.

And no, I do not think we SHOULD attack Iran. I do not think we could AFFORD to attack Iran. The problem with economical arguments is that the money doesn't become an issue until *AFTER* we've dropped all the bombs.



I was not talking about sunburn, this missile i talk about flyes not 60 meters above surface, but 10 meters and with speed of 2.8mach, your systems are not going to stop it.
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13    14  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 8 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags