Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
Is "deny ignorance" a one-way concept? Just checking because the tenor on the board as of late certainly seems to be that negative and incorrect
assertions and associations directed at Masonry are welcome while defense against or correction of the same are not.
Defense seems fine to me, and I would never deny a person the right to defend an idea. But when defense crosses the line into mudslinging, then it
gets attention. When it borders on outright threats it results in those cute little red stickers.
So I'm going to go out on a limb here and see if I can point out a problem.
You willingly join a group with some history, rightly or wrongly gained, for being less than above board. This group has "secret" rites and is
considered a SECRET organization, at least to the general public. You are closed group, meaning that there must be some standard decided on by those
already involved to allow a new member to join.
And yet, you get all up in arms and act surprised when people question the aims and purposes of the group? You expect that you can participate in a
CONSPIRACY forum without anyone ever seeing a conspiracy angle to your group? You think that just because you say "It ain't so" everyone who fails
to automatically believe you is persecuting you?
What planet do you live on? Conspiracy is seen in everything by the people that come here. This board is aimed at finding conspiracies, and these are
found by questioning what is told to the masses. If there is no conspiracy, then all you need to do is let the anti-masons hang themselves for lack of
facts. Instead, your rabid defense and attack in anger mode just makes a lot of people think you have something to hide or you wouldn't be so
touchy.
Instead of trying to force your innocence down everyone else's throat, have you considered calmly forcing the opposition to prove it's own points?
Your taking the heat because you're taking the lead by trying to prove yourselves lily white and without fault. (Ask any cop, the cases that are
hardest to get evidence in are the ones where the accused makes the system do all the work.)
In other words, by it's very nature, a conspiracy site will bring out people that think Masons are some evil empire. Expect that, and stop reacting
like it's unfair that it would even happen. If incorrect assertions are brought forward, ask for proof, and then attack the proof. If something is
negative on a personal level alert us to the post. (BUT, bear in mind, you chose to join a group with a somewhat negative image, so if the negative
vibes are about Masons in general, then suck it up and take it as part of the image you chose.)
I think a lot of the problems on this issue are because almost everyone involved has gotten to the point they have run out of material and are down to
using mud as their main weapon, on both sides.