Originally posted by Caustic Logic
So they've made you my assassin, eh? It's NOT pointless. The point is Rob almost certainly knew the "north plot data" didn't exist, or shold have known it anyway, but insisted it was real until it was undeniable. And then just silence with no admission, covered by rips on me for being willing to admit the FEW times I've bee undeniably wrong. That's telling.
PFT reports on the data. Period. They do not theorize. CIT theorizes but only based on hard data that we have personally obtained or verified.
There is no proof that you are correct in your claim of map rotation but it does not change the fact that the NTSB released an animation that contradicts the FDR and shows a north heading.
PFT is not required to explain WHY they did this or to accept your speculation in this regard. They merely reported the facts.
What's intellectually dishonest on your part is the fact that you are running around with an arrogant alter ego proclaiming that it's "over" or that you have "won" this discussion when the FDR still fatally contradicts the physical damage and the eyewitnesses still prove the plane was on the north side.
I know how bad you want to "win" this argument in favor of the official story but you are certainly NOT "winning" despite your empty declarations.
It has never been used for much explicitly, of course. Could that be because it was too useful to ignore but too tentative to put much weight on? It's a small part, but a part nonetheless, of the larger puzzle.
Huh? It's because we understand and present the facts while you try your hardest to obfuscate them. The NTSB did release an animation contradictory to the FDR and the eyewitnesses did see the plane fly on the north side. PFT and CIT simply reported it. No matter how you slice it or spin it NONE of it supports the official story.
I know this frustrates you to no end but it is undeniable.
And he admited that his libelous title of this thread was unwarranted
Did not. Sorry for any misunderstanding - I conceded the title was personalized to get Rob's attention. Libel:
en.wikipedia.org...
Anything false? If not, the only thing damage is that he didn't catch the error himself, or pretended not to. And that's not my fault. I even prodded and got no response, so I expose. The thread and even title are warranted by these facts, but I guess a title change is fair enough. Hasn't happened tho... I guess being a CM doesn't give you asmuch influence as I thought.
He was not "wrong". The title of the thread is incorrect and is an attack on Rob's credibility as a researcher so it is therefore libelous. You DID admit this. Whether or not your analysis as to HOW they created the alleged error is correct (which I am not conceding) that doesn't change what the animation shows. The animation is what it is. The NTSB is a government entity and it is not Rob's place or your place to say that what they released is merely an "honest mistake".
You are saying this about the ASCE report and the Purdue animation as well. You simply justify all officially reported contradictions away no matter how fatal as if there is no chance of deception on the part of government entities.
This is 100% contradictory behavior for someone who claims to believe that 9/11 was an inside job.
It's always about you, isn't it? In fact I decided to join for other reasons, reading the old forum threads, and saw you guys had been banned just as I found the new forum and scanned it before signing up. It had been like a week. It's actually a coincidence tho I don't expect you to believe that. I do appreciate and am exploiting the dynamic there, but I half regret you aren't there. I thought you would be when I decided "time to sign up."
Now you are lying. You have been straight up sourcing the LCF in your blog all month and even referenced a post Aldo made back in March!
Aldo “Merc” Marquis, CIT co-founder and proponent of Witness/FDR northiness, said in March “I don't believe [the data] came from the Northside flyover military plane that the witnesses saw. I believe the data is faked to try and match the Northside Citgo path somewhat, for whatever reasons they chose. Either way, we win.”
That's quite a few months of back reading to do in a single week for a forum that you supposedly just found out about. The "new" forum is about a year old by now and I simply do not buy the notion that you haven't read it at all until about a week ago. Your blog says otherwise.
Nope. All the same info and beliefs. I'm not sure why I'm more aggro there. It's a different dynamic. It's a bit too easy so far, and I'm just feeling it out. It might be too boring to stay there myself.
This response doesn't even make sense. You have a COMPLETELY different persona. You are either being manipulative or are certified schizophrenic.
Keep on guessing, man.
BTW: sorry I said "assassin above." That was a bit melodramatic. I should have said "handler."
I doubt he is Caustic Logic/Adam Larson who isn't very bright.
We keep him at bay over at ATS and he usually caves pretty easily.
z9.invisionfree.com...
Has it ever occurred to you that the main reason I "cave" so much is because I don't have THE TIME for your BS?
See? I didn't even believe it was you! That's how incredibly different you are acting. You cave easily because you are WRONG and we prove it.
You are acting like a bully on LCF because we are not there to put you in your place.
Don't have the time! That's a joke. You always find the time to reply here, create an alter ego to post with there, and continuously create your convoluted, useless, neutralizing, vapid blogs as the Frustrated Fraud.
Since your schizophrenia has clearly kicked in high gear I think I will choose to call you the Frustrated Fraud from here on out for simplicity's sake.
[edit on 28-9-2007 by Craig Ranke CIT]
But Seriously. Please retract "libel." 
