posted on Sep, 23 2007 @ 11:11 AM
ok I was interested enough to look at this clip. when you watch it hit the second button on right of you tube player to see it without it stretched.
It is clearer.
Ok watch his head accepting two things, up tics when speaking means yes left to right means no. I am assuming this is a fair clue of him lying or
Any word said at time of a blink is coincidence or a stress word or lie.
"not at all its a pleasure" head up tick Yes or (truth)
"no not really" Same head tick up so he is signaling yes as he says no (Lie). blinks matched every word he said one for each word in proper time.
The question was on evidence, so this could be evidence of fake us program.
"I was assesing the information trying to tell who was telling the truth and who wasn't" He is not on camera but listen to his sentance pace.
when he gets to 'telling the truth and who wasn't' he rushes, he wants to get past that part. The topic of truth and lie is something that
stresses him. listen for the tempo
Now this gets odd, That um unidentified (stutter)flying objects are infact real as real as the planes flying over your head" Saying UFO was a
stresser, a pause, not wanting to say it, and a stutter during saying it.
He is back in frame at "are in fact real" he does a head shake no (Lie) Subconsciecly flying over your head might have been chosen because he is
saying things at a level others are not privledged to.
"and there has been a monumental coverup for more then a half a century" big blink on more then half. time frame of coverup is a lie. but when he
says a monumental coverup he doesnt flinch at all. so there is some type of coverup.
"This is after looking at alot of evidence" long eye close at 'This is after' (lie) what ever he knows, it is not built after. His
knowledge did not come from long looking. he also gives a big no shake on 'looking' confirming this shakes head again smaller on 'evidence'. He
did not form his opinion after looking at alot of evidence.
"and trying to desern who is telling the truth and who wasn't. he gets a smirk here. he is proud of something.
"and I have concluded uniquivically", big shake on 'uniguivically', small one on 'concluded'. (lieing) that long blink on uniquivically
long stint of people who have seen evidence or seen classified documents then "are the ones telling the truth... ...basing policy conditions on
that" stone cold here. He is telling the truth that people have seen documents. Head noding up and down. And that he is basing policy on that. So
we have no on alien evidence, yes on coverup and yes that people seen docs. so this means the coverup is probally these false documents. but not 50
He backs away from the moon tucker question with a little smile and almost denial when he says thats why I am asking question. He seems embarrised
"forcast in book' head nod (truth)
"wanting to build" Head shake (lie) dead timed blink on wanting with shake
"base on the moon as far back as 1964", true. so there was a base wanted by some, but not by the people he is speaking of. Sort of 'wanting' is
true but none of us wanted that, then when he gets into the purposal to build it he goes straight from truth memory clean and smooth, so their was a
purposal but not high up.
"General Arthur Trudor same name as one of my bosses" general up nod, real name. voice and down and to the left on his last name showed contempt
and dislike. same down and to the left on bosses.
"was very determined to build a forward base on the moon." He almost laughs before saying and pauses, it is beyond rediculous to him.(lie)
Prepared all of the specification" big blink on 'spec' big head shake, (lie)
He also starts to say
"when they were first" speaking of aliens, then corrects it to
"when the crash occured" This is an odd correction.
When they were first recovered?
He is speaking from a referance of some type of human interaction with with a living animate plural thing. 'They' is more then one thing, and it is
used for life not inanimate objects, the craft is a single object an 'it'.
The thing is he changes to just crash, removing the elluded information of discription. He backs off his first thought, that is covering something
over. Why would he cover his opinion about the crash or if bodies were found why does he openly claim to be a believer then hold back something?
Could 'they' be the people who are making the story?
"there is no evidence, that I have seen, that would really convince me that they are in fact actually you know enemy" He very easily related the
info of what the guy back in rosewald said about them being called enemies. But when he spoke about what he thought he paused and didn't want to say
it, then a big shake on 'enemy'. Since enemy is bad, and no is like bad I don't know here. also we have double negatives so tough to tell, is it
not enemy so that why no shake, or shake on enemy meaning not friend. Not a clue.
"And what I would like to know.. he goes on" his head shake matches the words, when he speaks in no's he shakes, in yes he nods, so this looks
"I think this is tremendously improtant" Big shake, eyes closed (lier lier pants on fire)
(canadians) "no absolutly not most of them are skeptics" big defense of canadians that don't believe
"most of them havn't spent time researching the subject" smile on researching the subject.
"they would be very similiar to the average american" shake and closed eyes on 'american' (lie) he thinks we believe cunuks don't
All the witness stuff and canadian opening hearing. spot on(truth) He wants hearings.
For a UFO'logist he doesn't remember the guys name involved, puts his extensive research to question.
Note that tucker belittles people corporations and power do not want heard, he was really nice and did not degrade this topic at all.
Looks like Bush is going to claim Iranians are pod people.
[edit on 23-9-2007 by Redge777]