posted on Sep, 20 2007 @ 11:56 AM
I don't feel Scott Ritter's insight is too far off the mark.
It truly would be a devastating move for the current Administration to continue on it's war-beaten path.
William Scott Ritter, Jr. (born July 15, 1961) is noted for his role as a chief United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991 to 1998,
and later for his criticism of United States foreign policy in the Middle East. Prior to the US invasion of Iraq in March, 2003, Ritter publicly
argued that Iraq possessed no significant weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). He became a popular anti-war figure and talk show commentator as a
result of his stance.
Being noted for criticism of US foreign policy in the M.E.?... He's been noted for speaking out against a policy of assume/accuse first, bomb next,
lie later? I applaud Scott for his stance. He has been a credible source. Why would one not want to listen to him?
I support Scott's stance, and I feel more people need to heed the warnings as not to allow us to be injected into another lose/lose situation created