Extremely Large Moon, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 09:48 PM by Dewm0nster
Originally posted by uberarcanist
Nobody knows for sure, but the prevailing theory seems to be that it's an optical illusion.

www.how-come.net...




Wow,
Hey guys, don't worry about it.
Uber's got this one down pat.
I mean, no one really knows for sure if it could be as simple as an optical allusion.
It's likely much more complex- Like, somehow the moon decides to lose weight the higher it gets (Likely doesn't want to appear overweight with so many eyes on it.)

Outstanding.
The whole thing, outstanding.



reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 05:29 AM by Now_Then
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Don't they call that the "harvest moon?"


Actually each full moon has a name, the harvest moon is in September, the name comes from the extra light field workers would get so that they could work after sunset. There is a table of all the other names
here quite near the bottom of the page, we should be in the 'old moon' now, or the wolf moon.

To the OP... Did you know at the last perigee (point at which the moon is closest to the Earth in its orbit) back in December it was the closest one for about 15 years? And it was only about 120 miles further away than it's absoloute closest point in it's 375 (ish... google it!) cycle. So yep, I suppose now is the time it could look bigger! I think it can vary by 14%.

But yhea, overall I would go with optical illusion, when it's low you can reference it easily to known objects like hills and trees, when it's way up on it's own it can look considerably smaller.

The moon, nice to look at, not worth visiting by all accounts... No atmosphere, and John Lear lives there
Pages:     ^^TOP^^