The 3 minutes BEFORE the student got tasered @ Kerry's Q&A, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 42 times


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 09:29 PM by Equinox99
reply to post by uberarcanist



He wouldn't stop screaming because he had the right to ask those questions. So what, now if we ask a question they can't answer, they have the right to remove us?


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 09:29 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by MystikMushroom



Horrible idea. Will probably get you killed. Better just to take the temporary pain of a taser jolt.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 09:31 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by Equinox99



Screaming is not meaningful speech and is thus not constitutionally protected.



reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 09:32 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by mattifikation



No, it's meant to stop unpredictable, raving loons, and was used in this context on this idiot.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 09:42 PM by Equinox99
reply to post by uberarcanist



Okay so what you want us to do is suppress our questions because a senator or politician can't answer it? Maybe in a few years our politicians can pick our president for us, and then heck maybe we can become a dictatorship run country. Well, if you do not fight for your freedom now, you may lose it in the future.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 09:45 PM by MystikMushroom
reply to post by uberarcanist



Have you ever been around a pepper spray discharge? Just being in 2-4 feet of the discharge will be enough to make you want to run away.

Being grabbed by several people, a spray or two would be enough for ANY arm-bar or full-nelson hold on you--and allow you to run like hell.

If they pull guns, then they are using "lethal" weapons in response to a "non lethal" self-defense tactic. Won't look to good in a court of law--especially in this guy's situation where he was clearly being "roughly treated" and quite possibly afraid for his life.

A guy where I live died in a bar because the security took him to the ground and sat/positioned themselves on top of him. He suffocated. You're damn right i'd fear for my LIFE if I had 6 overzealous "rent-a-cops" with a "rambo" attitude twisting and making me feel powerless. What laws have I broken? Social mores? Yes, social laws of "decent behavior" perhaps...

None of this warrants being treated this way.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 09:45 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by Equinox99



I'm just saying that freedom of speech is not a license to act like a lunatic. There are ways to promote meaningful change, the "victim" here wasn't pursuing them.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 09:53 PM by Equinox99
reply to post by uberarcanist



I know it is not a license to act like a lunatic, but once those rights are violated by the people who are supposed to protect it, then we have no other choice but to act like lunatics.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 10:01 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by SpadeofAces



He didn't have to get tasered. He was totally given an opportunity to avoid that fate.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 10:02 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by Equinox99



I disagree. The best way to fight abuses of power is with sane civil disobedience, like what Gandhi did. Going crazy only makes the situation worse.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 10:03 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by Obliv_au



Would you take away their tasers and advocate a return to wounding shots and nightsticks?


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 10:06 PM by SpadeofAces
reply to post by uberarcanist



He had no opportunity to avoid anything, it was the officer's choice, it was bad judgement, and excessive force! Even if he was being unruly according to the officers, I do not believe a taser had to be used to correct this situation.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 10:11 PM by Obliv_au
Originally posted by uberarcanist
reply to
post by Obliv_au



Would you take away their tasers and advocate a return to wounding shots and nightsticks?


why would they need to use either of them, they had him on the ground and he clearly wasnt getting up.

taser is fine in extreme circumstances, just like capsicum sprays..
but some people are too eager to use them whenever possible just to get compliance on a citizen who was clearly not fighting or throwing punches.

sure he was grandstanding up there, maybe he did deserve to get thrown out of the place - i dunno.. but using it on a passively resistant citizen whos already pinned, just to force more compliance and shut them up is a bit extreme.

he may have been screaming and yelling like a madman, but he wasnt throwing punches or getting ready to swing a knife.


reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 10:41 PM by corusso
reply to post by SpadeofAces



The students do look afraid to move. The guy, IMO, did nothing wrong before he was grabed by to cops. He may have been a little excited when he spoke, but he is a 20ish college student. He gave a short statement and then asked a few questions.
Who decided he should be removed?
At what point was he under arrest?
Will America wake up before its too late?

[edit on 19-9-2007 by corusso]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Poland Beekeepers Win Ban on Monsanto\'s GMO!
  Posted 11 days ago with 74 member flags
Girl, 16, Kills Herself After Researching 2012 Doomsday Threads...
  Posted 8 days ago with 49 member flags
AP IMPACT: Evacs and drills pared near nuke plants
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
Plane Crash!
  Posted 17 days ago with 27 member flags