Anomalies on mars

reply to post by Lunica

---

Hi Lunica

I posted a link to the original panorama that i used to get the images in the initial post on this thread. Its a hi res tiff and is around 300mb in size, there is a 23 mb jpg that you can use as well.

reply to post by 4thDoctorWhoFan

---

Hi 4thDoctorWhoFan

Thanks for that, thats about as good as i managed to get it as well after doing some filtering etc .... to me that just does not look right Whats your opinion?

Hmmm, it does look like a broken up, hollow sphere/orb, doesn't it? With the left fragment on the ground and the sun shadow inside it

It's a Martian Ying/Yang!

Or perhaps a Martian hub cap.....hmmm.....bottle cap?

Seriously, does anyone have any idea as to the scale of the objects in these pics?

On the full panorama, comparing the object to the apparent size of tracks and a trench dug by Spirit's right-front wheel, which no longer rotates, I'd say this object is rather small.

Maybe a few inches across at most?

So yeah, definitely a bottle cap, or maybe an ancient pull-tab?

Don't know what it is, would have to pick it up and juggle it around to tell for sure. Could be ejecta from a nearby crater, could be volcanic (almost the same formation properties exist with both ejecta and organic rocks) I have seen many volcanic rocks with unusual "paths" and holes in them. Add in hundreds of thousands of years of wind blown sandblasting and the jagged holes become smooth, just as we see here.

Again, hard to say. But to take the flying leap of absurdity and believe it is evidence of some hidden nefarious alien knowledge being covered up is just plain wrong when you can explain Earthly reasons how and why you could get a rock to form like that.

reply to post by Navieko

---

I ran your water image through Photoshop's auto level filter and this is what I came up with.




the technique has been used and posted about on this board.

I don't think anybody believes this is definite proof of anything. For me anyway its just some fun speculation of what might be. I am allowed to have some fun and think of what might be out there right?

I am awair of that tnxx. I have downloaded the 300mb file. Not been able to look at it, need a program for it.

For my question:
I mean a different photo as I inverted in the post earlier (maybe you missed it). They look like skulls. They are also anomalies, and I cant find the original of it. Maybe someone knows.


image source: http://members.home.nl/a.c.vanbeek/faces%20on%20mars.JPG

Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't the auto level filter set for conditions on this planet? What would look right through our eyes on earth? I would think that the program algorhythms would be different for another planet's light and atmospheric conditions.

But I'm not an expert in this sort of thing. Just some idle musings ...

Hey, thats pretty cool!

Nice

You use the same filter to get the "original" colors as they have discovered when looking at the pathfinder photo's? (I thought it was the pathfinder with the square with on each edge a different color?)

reply to post by Lunica

---

I used Photoshop 7.0's Auto level filter. I have seen the technique used many times before when examining Mars photo's , in many places on this board.

That JPL lake picture sure seems like an airbrush job. Even after autolevel, first it doesn't look blue, and is blurry, totally unnatural to the overall landscape crispness, especially zoomed in. Also note the right side of the lake is on a descending slope. How could it retain the water? the ripples don't match the surroundings, the zoomed in picture doesn't look right both in crispness and color and laws of physics says "water" flows down hill, which this one apparently defies. Maybe there was something else there NASA was trying to hide with the PhotoShop job?

And funny thing, the JPG version is no longer available... Check the following

JPL image error

Hmmm... Maybe temporary. Let's see what they post back in its place in the next few days, shall we?

I think you missed it, a poster colored it in from a normal picture a few replies back and it is quickly going to overcome common sense and reason by developing into it's own life until someone screams "Hoax", lol. It's just a "what if" chop job for sh!ts and giggles, nothing more.

reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts

---

The real JPL photojournal pic really showed the pic exactly as shown by the poster. He posted his "enhanced" version. However, I was referring to the original JPL picture that was airbrushed, not the one that we all knew was altered by said poster. Lets call that one "the altered clone of the original altered picture"

But you must admit, something is clearly wrong about the original official NASA picture, even though you're the skeptical one about everything unrelated to what you can touch, smell, see or hear, by the looks of it... Just like the Navajo's and Apache's when they saw the Iron Horse coming across the plains. Besides, it's all good speculative fun

If those sand ripples are airbrushed, then every picture I have ever seen of the dessert here on this planet must be airbrushed too. Man, those guys sure are thorough, unlucky for them there is a bunch of crack internet investigators blowing the lid of of their cover up.

Just been looking through some more panoramas this evening and just wondering what everyone thought of these









my question is.... what is nasa trying to hide here ! why have the original hi res images been "patched" ... its not even airbrushing !

The pano is full of them

This is the full image Hi res Panorama

reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts

---

OK let's look at the original from my cache temp files



Now, if that middle part (lake) don't look fuzzy, airbrushed and out of place in the original NASA zoom and color, you can stick me in a dress and call me Shirley all you want, how's that... Look all around it. Nice and crisp everywhere. Middle? blurry.

Mind you, being so negative and skeptic, you'll just deny seeing anything wrong with this picture just to stick me in a dress and call me Shirley :p

reply to post by scepticsRus

---

Looking at that picture, I don't see any patching with brown squares in my browser...