Weird Moon Anomaly! A Big UFO Or Artificial Structure?, page 3

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 12:15 AM by Dallas

reply to post by merka

That's all I'm seeing to. Fancy and not so fancy NASA labs airbrush work or straight qurks in the resolution. Nothing anomalous beyond that.
Mayhap's ATS pic analysis specialist can take a look?

Dallas

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 12:28 AM by angelc01

I imagine that the guy who airbrushed this particular photo will get fired .It just goes to show you that even the smartest sometimes are absentminded, and fail to see details.
Even in perfection there are flaws.

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 12:48 AM by mikesingh

reply to post by PokeyJoe

Pokey, you'll be surprised to know that NASA has completely edited out the anomaly in the subsequent ver of the Clementine browser!!

Cheers!

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 01:22 AM by infamouskiller

Why don't we mark these long and lats and take pictures ourselves of these locations with a telescope

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 01:37 AM by BitRaiser

reply to post by infamouskiller

Because obviously Hexi-Dimentional-trasmorgraphic holograms would make the structures appear invisible to anyone who is not of Lunarian descent!

Actually, that's a damned good idea.
Anyone got a telescope?

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 02:39 AM by Chorlton

Originally posted by bprintz1
mikesingh,

Frankly I am a little shocked that you don't reference him, but maybe you came by it from another source. I believe that he is, however, the originator of this "discovery." Did you spend hundreds of hours scanning the Clemintine material and find this all by yourself?

I usually look forward to your posts, but I find your possible lack of forthrightness irritating and telling. Credit seems due to Mr. Skipper.

Mr. Skipper's site is full of many wonderous "discoveries" to be made by anyone who can endure his wordiness.

Very well spotted bprintz1

I saw the similarities as soon as Mikesingh posted his pictures but hoped he would acknowledge his source sooner or later.

Well Mike ??????????

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 05:25 AM by aardvark

Not necessarily a sceptic, but wouldnt they put more effort into airbrushing this if it was real? I could airbrush better.......

Just a thought

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 05:29 AM by mikesingh

Originally posted by Blaine91555
Whatever was there was lifted off or damaged with tape. Ordinary scotch tape most likely. Perhaps a note was taped to it and removed before it was scanned?

That's possible, but don't those guys know that a perfectly good image can be screwed up by sticking tape all over it? I thought imaging experts were at work here, not some gobbledygooks working for a sensitive imaging department at NASA!

A wrecking crew, if ever there was one!

Cheers!

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 05:48 AM by mikesingh

reply to post by bprintz1

bprintz1, thanks for that link. By the way, JP is an acquaintance of mine, but frankly, I haven't had the time nor the inclination of reading through his website with a tooth comb. Heck! I haven't even had the time to go through my own page hosted by Zorgon on his website!! There are a couple of images I've pinched from JP in some of my other threads on ATS, but needless to say, with due permission from him!

This particular pic was a result of trying to find anomalies that were apparently airbrushed by NASA in the same general area. Check out Turbohale's thread here..

So it's no big deal zeroing on to an anomaly on the Moon or Mars. It's all available on the net in various image browsers of NASA/ESA.

However, I goofed up some by not acknowledging ArMap who had posted a small image taken by Clementine where this anomaly was visible, but not discussed. What was discussed then were some other anomalies which were seemingly airbrushed by NASA, in the general area like in Turbohales thread.

Cheers!

[edit on 19-9-2007 by mikesingh]

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 06:02 AM by Havalon

reply to post by mikesingh

Hi Mike,
Good thread as per usual,
Just to re-iterate my post in a similar thread, and I would appreciate input on this!

Originally posted by Havalon
I just wonder!
If all the images of the moon,
taken from all the different sources,
ie different missions were assembled,
then in theory there should be a way to re-visit some of these blurred co-ordinates and assemble an (un-airbrushed/depixilated) version of the area and amend their library!

That is unless you have the samething to hide in each of the suspect (airbrushed) co-ordinates!!!

If you look closely at the link you will see black boxes on the photo, you can even zoom into them. This is where (I would guess) that overlap of stips did not occur and rather than 'fill in' with airbrush they left it black.
Hence the anomoly of why airbrush, when you could leave a black box.

www.nrl.navy.mil/clm/

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 06:09 AM by stompk

We need to put together a group of people and win that $30 mil Google prize, and go check out the moon for ourselves.

I think it would be a treasure hunt of artifacts.

I have an idea that I've been working on for an
anti-gravity propulsion system, that would work equally as
well in zero gravity, that I would like to share with someone
who has mechanical/electrical engineering background.

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 06:41 AM by mikesingh

reply to post by Havalon

Havalon, good idea!

Ok, so here's the same image but in the next ver of the Clementine browser, ver 2.0. The first one is on ver 1.5. The latter shows no anomaly! So has this been brushed out in the later version of the browser? Or was there some glitch in the previous version that shows the anomaly?

You're guess is as good as mine!

Ver 1.5. Now it's here!

Ver 2.0 (Beta) Now it's not!

Thanks to ArMap for these images.

Cheers!

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 06:49 AM by omi_kron_gravitron

moon conspiracy theories are becoming moot arguements.
NASA is not the only Organization that is allowed on the moon.
no government can stop anyone from going up there.
no one can stop the impeding space tourism programs. NASA cant block out earth based telescopes from looking at the moon...
why dont you people stop speculating and pushing pixels in photoshop.
the moon is right above us. and its free for all, its not a top secret no-go military zone... space is free.
no one has yet to take initiative to check out "anomalies" on the moon. not even people or universities with giant telescopes capable of getting clear images of Saturn and Jupiter. the moon is a "hop" away.
if you live in jersey, near Rutger University, you can use their telescope to star gaze. pretty much any major university with giant telescopes have "free" night for people to use the equipment they pay taxes for.
if you live in MA, near boston, go to Brandeis University or BU.
and go "debunk".

[edit on 19-9-2007 by omi_kron_gravitron]

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 06:52 AM by Havalon

reply to post by mikesingh

The edges of the black boxes are always North/South or East/West and some of the boxes are quite jagged
(meaning that the pixels, theoretically, should be in a straight line if there was a lack of 'overlap' on an orbit) they bear closer scrutiny methinks.
Which came first, the black box or the airbrush?

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 06:56 AM by Vixion

Good find mike, its look good. I thoguht a combine harvestor type thing, but hey im wierd. Great find though.

Take Care, Vix

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 07:53 AM by IgnoreTheFacts

Originally posted by wingzero93
reply to post by mikesingh

I hate to say it, but this is the real deal. There is no plausible explanation for this, This is in fact, an object of non-natural formation. Period. Nuff said.

Wow, your total lack of understanding how digital imaging works has lead to to a conculsion that is just ridiculous. Deny ignorance, my friend, which means "deny the lack of what you don't understand" LOL

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 08:15 AM by Havalon

reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts

Instead of having a dob at the OP, why don't you hazard a guess, give an opinion, make a calculated estimation, research the anomoly originaly offered up by the OP.

I guess what I am trying to say is, you are not reading the message and proffering an educated analysis of that message, therby actually contributing to the search of knowledge and the thread in general.

Instead, you come into the thread and point the finger at the messenger and not the message.
Please tell us what you think that photo shows. the one with the sharp, combed edges. Is that a natural phenomenon on the moon?

Have a nice day

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 08:25 AM by IgnoreTheFacts

reply to post by Havalon

Fist of all, Havalon, I was responding to a post that has less meaning, reason, and conclusions than my post, and example of which I'm sure you wish to overlook to make your point. Please go back and re-read the exchange to get a proper point of view before posting again.

As far as explaining what you are seeing in these pictures, I did not know it was my job to educate you on how this finishing process works when it comes to mosaic pictures. Some have done so in this thread, and I did not feel the need to repeat what they have said, for fear blind believers such as yourself would attack me for repeating what has already been posted.

Please, review this thread and issue the same criticism to everyone who has contributed in this thread, for and against, in the same manner I have, otherwise you transparent desire to believe the absurd without thinking it through or investigating it for himself is apparent to anybody around here with half a brain.

[edit on 19-9-2007 by IgnoreTheFacts]

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 08:35 AM by slaveearth

My avatar says it all... Apollo 15 with a friend

Apollo 16's friend

Apollo 12's friend

this really old news

just accept it ...and take a step forward.

reply posted on 19-9-2007 @ 08:52 AM by wingzero93

reply to post by mikesingh

this "tape" idea seems more unlikely than the idea of it being a structure. I mean this isn't grade 4 cut a paste here folks. Come on, tape?? Look at it closer, the "tape" isn't even rectangular.