reply to post by merka
That's all I'm seeing to. Fancy and not so fancy NASA labs airbrush work or straight qurks in the resolution. Nothing anomalous beyond that.
Mayhap's ATS pic analysis specialist can take a look?
Dallas

Originally posted by Havalon
I just wonder!
If all the images of the moon,
taken from all the different sources,
ie different missions were assembled,
then in theory there should be a way to re-visit some of these blurred co-ordinates and assemble an (un-airbrushed/depixilated) version of the area and amend their library!
That is unless you have the samething to hide in each of the suspect (airbrushed) co-ordinates!!!

Ok, so here's the same image but in the next ver of the Clementine browser, ver 2.0. The first one is on ver 1.5. The
latter shows no anomaly! So has this been brushed out in the later version of the browser? Or was there some glitch in the previous version that shows
the anomaly?


Originally posted by wingzero93
reply to post by mikesingh
I hate to say it, but this is the real deal. There is no plausible explanation for this, This is in fact, an object of non-natural formation. Period. Nuff said.
