That is quite the innovattive idea, in that usual a staged attack is one that kills civilians, and assasinations are of expendable lower level people,
a titular leader who is kept out of the loop (like JFK), or any visible figure in an opposition movement. Staged terror attacks that kill civilians-
ala 911, are also part of the vocabulary. It's a big assumption to think that Bush himself would be part of PLANNING a covert staged attack- as would
have to be the case if he were the "victim." He couldn't just be shut off and babysat like he was on 9-11. Still- this is a very effective viable
model, that as far as I know, has not been done. What would be so unusual- but quite logical- to stage an assasination designed to fail, but fail
conspicuously- and what would make it so effective- is that by raising the stakes in the War on Terror, they could make a show of a key figure in the
administration having their own safety in danger. I'm thinking- like if Rumsfeld starts getting heat in Congress or Ashcroft over any number of
things- to have an attempt made on them in public. Skepticism rising over 9-11 and Iraq could be deflated by showing critics that one of them has
personally been a victim of terrorism. The White House can effectively seal off the public- and transform the Secret Service through a huge Patriot
Act style power grab. Cheney and Bush could show shock and fear themselves- talk about how it could have been one of them- and then they can play that
sympathy for all its worth. As for the assasin- I'm thinking a CIA deep cover operative with a cover story of being a mentally unstable liberal Earth
First type. That would help increased scrutiny and contempt for liberals, and by extension, Democrats. The War on Terror has taken the liberties of
its citizens and investigated and prosecuted progressive critics (like the Green Party official who found himself placed on No-Fly lists.) A lot of
criticism could be deflected by having something, anything, related to Terrorism be perpetuated by Liberals. I could go on with this scenario- but
mainly I'll just say that this idea, while a bit "out there" can also be seen as a logical progression. An attempted assasination of a
non-"expendable" figure is, if nothing else, a fresh angle to consider.
-DAB