It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Moon Photo's with sections smudged or blanked out!!!!! weird

page: 2
10
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 12:28 PM
link   
Don't know if already posted:


First, go to the following site:

www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...

Now here are the settings:

Desired Resolution: 1 pixel = 1 kilometer
- Image Size = 768x768
- Latitude = -70 (as in minus 70)
- Longitude = 137


Source:

Ufocasebook forum

Result:




(edit to add pic)

[edit on 17/9/2007 by internos]




posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 12:29 PM
link   
If you actually click on any portion of the pics, it takes you to a higher resolution of the same area. Nothing there.

I don't think they are hiding anything, if they were, they would have done a much better job. Probably just glitches in the photos during the development phase.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 12:29 PM
link   
you can tell by looking at these images that they are made up of smaller images fit together to show you the big picture. i can easily imagine the blurry areas as just being places they didn't have hi-res images to place there.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 12:30 PM
link   
I thought the first image was rather telling. There is a rectangular area that grabs your attention, but no close ups are available. Even my wife, who thinks I'm a conspiracy nut
, thought that was strange.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 12:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Chorlton
 


Only an extremely powerful special type of telescope would be able to zoom in and find and determine a mining operation going on. How big do you think one would be, the size of a crater?

NASA is publicly stating that they're going to be sending astronauts to do this in 2020, so why exactly is it so hard to believe that the government has a more covert hand in mining currently if we're only 13 years out from it being public?



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by bigbert81
 


Just one word mate

Transportation.

We just dont have that sort of transportation and any spacecraft moving towards the moon would be spotted as soon as it left earth orbit.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 01:15 PM
link   
reply to post by bigbert81
 


I too find it very odd that you cannot zoom into one of the pictures I listed earlier. It says image not available, ummm something tells me that the Navy or Nasa havent finished photo shopping the image yet for our eyes.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 01:17 PM
link   
Its like saying Google maps have some blurred areas because they want to hide something.
Why even publish, if you want to hide?

If they wanted to hide, they'd have hidden the whole mission. Just call it a test launch.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 01:24 PM
link   
Maybe the Powers that be are trying a kind of reverse psychology approach to the whole thing, for example, by putting the pictures out into the public domain with items blurred out or blanked the agencies can say to the public "hey, look we have nothing to hide, its just bad resolution from the sattelite" and they know that the majority of people will swallow this approach because there is only a minority that believe UFO's, ET's etc actually exist.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 01:30 PM
link   
reply to post by rocksolidbrain
 


^
^^Thank you rocksolidbrain. I was looking reading through this thread wondering if anyone was going to make this very obvious point. As you said, why even publish this photo if you were trying to hide something...if there was something secret under the 'blur' wouldn't it be much easier just to put this photo in the "top secret" drawer and not publish it.

It is more lilely an equipment issue. Maybe the photo that makes up that mosaic tile was not photographed in the hi-res like the rest of the tiles.

EDIT:
And turbohale...I think there are many people such as myself that believe that ET's exist -- but believing that ET's exist is quite different than believing that they are visiting the Earth. Due to the shear size of the Galaxy and Universe, I'm pretty sure the former is true, but I have seen no concrete evidence that the latter is true.

[edit on 9/17/2007 by Soylent Green Is People]



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 01:33 PM
link   
they want us to know without saying it themselves, everybody wants them to just admit it already but theyre not going to do that, its a game theyre playing and you either play along or go play atari or something



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 03:18 PM
link   
For me the whole thing would not be so suspicious if it was just a blurred out image . But like somebody else already stated try to click a bit above/below/left/right of the image in the OP and then use the arrows to move the zoomed in picture to the side where the blurred area occured. You will get "The image is Unavailable" ..

So they map 99% of the area and you can zoom on any part of it but it just so happens they didnt map those few places
?



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 03:46 PM
link   
Nice pics TurboHale, geez it looks they have little cities blurred out. What a terrible job, or, are we gradually being prepped. I have always found it wierd how long it took for NASA to release pics. Way after they sent Clementine down to ping it. Just my 2c's.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 04:42 PM
link   
If anyone has some spare time, I'd reccomend that someone write nasa regarding this. A polite request for an explanation with a link to this thread would be good. It'd be cool to see what kind of response you get. If noone does it, I guess I'll do it but it won't be until i have more free time.


I'm slightly confused because when you load the OP's links, it says you can click on the picture for more detail. Does anyone know what's going on with this?


It's a long shot at this point, but there's the possibility that there's a plausible explanation that doesn't involve moon structures being covered up.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 06:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chorlton
reply to post by bigbert81
 


Just one word mate

Transportation.

We just dont have that sort of transportation and any spacecraft moving towards the moon would be spotted as soon as it left earth orbit.



But who says they're not being spotted on the mmon and travelling to and from the moon? Be fairly easy to hush it up and/or spread disinformation. They might even have people ready to post disinformation on boards like ATS if anyone ever got close to revealing anything.


And as to why NASA would bother trying to get by with a lousy photoshop job as coverup? The answer is simply who could really challenge them on it? Using what other sources of data?



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 06:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Turbohale
 


Hmmm..seems the 3rd photo doesn't have whole object blurred out.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 06:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Balboa
If anyone has some spare time, I'd reccomend that someone write nasa regarding this. A polite request for an explanation with a link to this thread would be good. It'd be cool to see what kind of response you get. If noone does it, I guess I'll do it but it won't be until i have more free time.


I'm slightly confused because when you load the OP's links, it says you can click on the picture for more detail. Does anyone know what's going on with this?


It's a long shot at this point, but there's the possibility that there's a plausible explanation that doesn't involve moon structures being covered up.


I would think twice before making such an email . The reason is that well there is a chance that this was a glitch in their imaging software or something and would be fixed .

But

On the other hand there is a big chance that is what it looks like .. a cover up and by pushing them against the wall for some comments you will give a few disinfo experts an hour or 2 work to find a credible explanation and next time , they might not be so careless and hire better photoshop experts



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 06:21 PM
link   
As I said in other threads about this, I think that the blur effect is a result of the software trying to create an image without any data except that from around those areas for which there is no data.

You can see all photos taken by Clementine here.

You will see that there aren't any photos for those blurred areas.

If they omitted the images because of any other reason than lack of data only they know.



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 07:05 PM
link   
I must admit that this one has me. I think it’s real. When a photo program does not have all the information to complete but is following a follow thru process it can either take from the photo or paste what is local to the area in question, also it can block in using the same color or it will leave the space blank. This block was on purpose. Poor application of Air brush program. There is something under that smudge.

Lunar Rover with a Hemi and they don’t want Al Gore to see it or he will get all green with them? Serial!!



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 07:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by sensfan
If you actually click on any portion of the pics, it takes you to a higher resolution of the same area. Nothing there.


How do you know when you click on the main picture that its taking you to the same area?



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join