Blackwater security firm banned from Iraq, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 02:38 PM by marg6043
reply to post by Hal9000



You answer you own question Hal, is not the first incident involving civilians, I believe that I have a thread exposing the blackwater and its littler dirty jobs behind the scenes, somewhere.

Yes they are in the front a security firm with honest and good ex military personnel that their job is to keep private workers for haliburton and subsidiries safe

But is another side of Blackwater that a lot of people do not know and that included the honest and good security guards.


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 02:41 PM by patriot13
Originally posted by Hal9000
reply to
post by patriot13


Maybe you can answer my previous question.

Why did BW loose their license because of this incident? This is not the first time innocent civilians have died in Iraq.

Was it the number of casualties? Or could there be more to the story?


First, they haven't lost their license - someone fromt he Iraqi govt. said they were going to revoke it, that won't happen in a day, it will have to go through some sort of process, be it exclusively in the Ministry of Interior (MOI), or as a charge brought forth by the MOI to the "Congress" I also think that process would involve Mr. Crocker at some point or another. ( US Ambassador)

Second - you are absolutely correct, innocent civilians die every day, perhaps you'd care to research the number killed by the "death squads" those would be the Sunnis killing the #e or vice versa. Or share with everyone the numbers killed by the IED's, EFP's, VBIED's, mortar's, and recent spate of chlorine attacks. They kill far far more of their own people they we ever will. Again - id like to point out that it's more likely then not that some of the "civilians" killed were the insurgents responsible for starting that ambush and ensuing gun battle in the first place. (sorry for that rant - im a little defensive, having seen both sides of the coin)

My PERSONAL GUESS would be that it's kinda like the final straw? Just like getting warnings or reprimands at work, then maybe called into the boss'es office and told to watch it, then a week without pay etc etc. ?


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 02:41 PM by DrOOpieS
reply to post by patriot13



Patriot you're making some pretty bold claims right there. You need to do better than "ask me any question" to convince the people here that you "worked" for BlackWater. So until you provide some proof to these claims, I'm going to view your "personal experience" with my skepticals on.

-Droops

[edit on 17-9-2007 by DrOOpieS]


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 02:43 PM by patriot13
Originally posted by DrOOpieS
reply to
post by patriot13



Patriot you're making some pretty bold claims right there. You need to do better than "ask me any question" to convince the people here that you "worked" for BlackWater. So until you provide some proof to these claims, I'm going to view your "personal experience" with my skepticals.

-Droops



I was waiting for that - you tell me how to prove it and I will do so. Please keep my privacy in mind - Im not going to post personal info anymore then you would. If youd post it here, then I prob. will to.


[edit on 17-9-2007 by patriot13]



reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 02:50 PM by makeitso
About the license.

According
a link the Danger Room Blog provides, BW is in the process of registering with Iraq, but has not completed that process yet.

Gonna be hard to revoke a non-existant license.

They do however have a contract with the State Department to provide security. Gonna be hard for the State Department to get around, ain't it?

On another note, I noticed a mention that the Iraqi Interior Minister "immediately" called to revoke their license. Immediate as in, the moment it happened. Like he and his sadr buddies knew it was gonna happen.

*shrugs*






[edit on 9/17/07 by makeitso]


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 02:53 PM by marg6043
reply to post by patriot13



You pay or ss number is not needed, we have other members in the boards claiming to be part of blackwater.

But let me ask you, do you know the background of the co founders of the group and the shady tactics that goes with their experience in the field in other nations like Africa?

That is why I feel that Blackwater have to faces the one that is given to the public and the one that have special assignments behind government and congress scrutiny.


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 02:54 PM by DrOOpieS
reply to post by patriot13



If that's what you think would justify an answer. Or maybe a little info on where you worked out of, things like that. It would just be easier for others to accept your claims if there was concrete evidence that you work/worked with the company. It would be great to have someone with that kind of knowledge on this site; to give info to people who are curious.

-Droops

[edit on 17-9-2007 by DrOOpieS]


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 03:06 PM by patriot13
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to
post by patriot13



You pay or ss number is not needed, we have other members in the boards claiming to be part of blackwater.

But let me ask you, do you know the background of the co founders of the group and the shady tactics that goes with their experience in the field in other nations like Africa?

That is why I feel that Blackwater have to faces the one that is given to the public and the one that have special assignments behind government and congress scrutiny.


First, ty for not needing my SS#
Thier background is public knowledge
I assume you know firsthand of their "shady tactics" + I never went to Africa.
Sure, they might have secret missions, i never said they didnt.
I said simply that i'd try to answer questions so everyone can make the most informed decision they can. Little things, like how it really works.


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 03:11 PM by Hal9000
reply to post by patriot13


Thanks, and I was also thinking that maybe this was a final straw incident. It surprises me that the Iraqi government is taking a stand. It seems they still want our help from the military, just not from BW.

That would be fine with me because I think war profiteering should be illegal, but I don't see this ban holding up.


reply to post by marg6043


Sorry I missed that, but I have a good idea what your talking about.


reply posted on 17-9-2007 @ 03:12 PM by patriot13
reply to post by Digital_Reality



You hit the nail right on the head. Very well written.

Again, they were AMBUSHED, of course they returned fire.

Anyone that has ever been in combat knows what it's like, unforunately it cant be explained.

Also, even if BW did lose the ability to work there, a diff. company would just pick the contract up. TC or DYN most likely.

[edit on 17-9-2007 by patriot13]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 19 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags