Blackwater security firm banned from Iraq, page 1

Blackwater security firm banned from Iraq

edition.cnn.com

Iraq's Interior Ministry has revoked the license of Blackwater Security Consulting, an American firm whose contractors are blamed for a Sunday gunbattle in Baghdad that left eight civilians dead.

The firefight took place near Nisoor Square about noon, an Interior Ministry official said Sunday. In addition to the fatalities, 14 people were wounded, most of them civilians, the official said.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Ok, details are still vague, but I doubt this firefight is the only reason for banning Blackwater from Iraq. Making use of their impunity mercenaries in Iraq have been blamed for numerous crimes, much more than the regular US soldiers. While I salute the decision of the Interior Ministry, I wonder why it comes now, and why they decide to stand against the US on that occasion. This is potentially huge IMO.

edition.cnn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Thread about the same news item, moved to WOT forum by moderation:
WOT - Thread

reply to post by northwolf

---

One in this forum and one in the other is fine. The other was moved because the available news source link takes the reader to a foreign language site.

Carry on.

Blackwater security firm banned from Iraq

Very nice excerpt from Jeremy Scahill's book, "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army" can be found here: MediaMouse: Blackwater The entire review is a nice read. Here are some interesting details of Blackwater's history:

The second event was the attack against the USS Cole in October of 2000. With Prince's connection to the Navy, he was able to negotiate a contract worth $35.7 million to conduct "force protection training." However, the biggest incident that propelled Blackwater to its current status were the attacks on September 11, 2001.

Blackwater was quickly providing training and gaining contracts with the FBI, the Department of Energy, the Department of the Treasury and even the Department of Health and Human Services. These connections eventually led to the agency's work in Iraq, which landed them their most high profile contract - guarding Paul Bremer in Iraq. This no-bid contract was worth $27.7 million that included "personal security detail and two helicopters for Bremer." Not surprising, Bremer is also Catholic and has maintained an intimate relationship with Prince and Blackwater even after his reign in Iraq. This symbiotic relationship led Bremer to create Order 17 as his last political act in Iraq. Order 17 in effect protects those in the private mercenary business from being prosecuted from any wrongdoing. Once Blackwater made a name for themselves in Iraq business really took off.

Then Fallujah happened. Several Blackwater contractors were killed in what Scahill documents as a botched mission. This didn't stop the administration and Blackwater in using the Blackwater deaths as justification for a massive military assault on that city just after the 2004 Presidential election. Blackwater used the incident to hire its first lobbyist, Paul Behrends, from the Republican lobbying firm Alexander Strategy Group
....

Read the whole article for more details on the religious connections (Theocons), the recruits from Latin America, and the hiring of CIA veterans. Obviously being the biggest private military contractor, this decision goes against the US (business)interests. My bet is that the barring of Blackwater from Iraq will be overruled...

Blacwater is responsible for all those truck bombings in the markets, that is what Blackwater does.
Religious wars are not like that - killing indiscriminately.
They bomb to destabilize that country and to have a reason to stay there.

www.boston.com...

WASHINGTON -- The FBI's counterterrorism unit has launched a broad investigation of US-based theft rings after discovering that some of the vehicles used in deadly car bombings in Iraq, including attacks that killed US troops and Iraqi civilians, were probably stolen in the United States, according to senior government officials.

[edit on 17-9-2007 by pai mei]

I note that CNN doesn't make it very clear that a convoy of U.S. State Department Diplomats came under attack.

The convoy security staff are supposed to do what? File a complaint? Jump out of the trucks and say, stop, or I'll say stop again?

How is it that a convoy came under fire? Who knew where they would be? Why did the attackers choose to attack from a public setting, surrounded by civilians, I wonder? What measures have been taken to find the attackers?

Lots and lots of questions on this one. For example, Iraqi PM says

"Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki condemns and strongly denounces the criminal operation committed by one of the foreign security companies in Al-Nissur Square,"

Yet, not a word condeming the group who attacked the Diplomatic Convoy and started the firefight from an area crowded with civilians? Interesting.

It's terrible to see that civilians were killed, and its preferable that nobody were killed. Its even more prefered that a Diplomatic Convoy would not be attacked, and that if it is, the attackers be condemned. Since they were attacked, SOP from any security team requires that cover fire be returned while an escape is made.

Al Bawaba says that an order to cancel Blackwaters license has been issued. Not that the license has been revoked. There is a difference me thinks. Time will tell.

Who called for the cancelation of the license? The Iraq interior minister (Jawad al-Bolani). What is his background?

Bulani has been a member of several political parties since Coalition forces removed Hussein from power:

The Sadrist Movement of Muqtada al-Sadr
The Hizbollah (Iraq) party of Abdel-Karim Mahoud al-Mohammedawi
The Islamic Virtue Party
wiki

In addition, an investigation of the incident has been called for.

"We have opened a criminal investigation against the group who committed the crime."

(meaning Blackwater)

So where is the call for an investigation on who attacked the convoy? An investigation on how they knew the convoy would be in the area, etc.?

Not in love with Blackwater, but there appears to be another side of a coin that is not even being discussed, or condemned. Whats up with that?

reply to post by KINGOFPAIN

---

Oh Man, I didn't think of that. If they can't stay in Iraq, where are they going to go? Back here of course... CRAP CRAP CRAP!!!!

I want them disbanded... and I want them to repay their no bid wages....

It still sickens me that Blackwater gets fat, starts drama in Iraq, and the 'TROOPS' suffer most of the casualties and flack for being over there.

It is interesting how much of the 'unrest' and 'insurgency' did not start until Blackwater was making the rounds. You all remember that time period, the one of 'Shock and Awe' and Mission Accomplished Banners...

DocMoreau

Originally posted by makeitso
I note that CNN doesn't make it very clear that a convoy of U.S. State Department Diplomats came under attack.

Where does it say that they were "U.S. State Department Diplomats"?

Neither article says who BW was protecting.

How is it that a convoy came under fire? Who knew where they would be? Why did the attackers choose to attack from a public setting, surrounded by civilians, I wonder?

Good question, but my guess is that it could have been a regular scheduled trip or someone taking advantage of an opportunity. It also bothers me that the locals do not condemn the insurgents or that they are never held accountable.

Al Bawaba says that an order to cancel Blackwaters license has been issued. Not that the license has been revoked. There is a difference me thinks. Time will tell.

I think it is pretty clear in the first article that they are no longer allowed to operate.

An Interior Ministry spokesman, Brig. Gen. Abdul Kareem Khalaf, said, "We have revoked Blackwater's license to operate in Iraq. As of now they are not allowed to operate anywhere in the Republic of Iraq. The investigation is ongoing, and all those responsible for Sunday's killing will be referred to Iraqi justice."

Originally posted by KINGOFPAIN
what if blackwater was moving out because something huge is going to happen over there? and they will be needed here. This could be a cover story for whats really going on.

Interesting point.I didn't think of that. With the attack (nuclear?) on Iran looking closer than ever, it could be that Blackwater would be needed elsewhere. Eventual social untrest (revote) back in US can happen with probably most if not all of Americans seeing how huge a mistake a new war can be. Those two recent news items support this theory IMO:
Bush setting up America up for war with Iran
Bowman Asks Military to refuse orders to attack Iran

Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags

Google announces privacy settings change across products; users can\'t opt out
  Posted 18 days ago with 78 member flags

BREAKING: Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran\'s nuclear scientists, U.S. officials tell NBC
  Posted 3 days ago with 73 member flags

Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags

Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags

FDA\'s New Claim: "Your Body Is a Drug—and We Have the Authority to Regulate It"
  Posted 10 days ago with 53 member flags

Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags

Bill Gates Backs Climate Scientists Lobbying For Large-Scale Geoengineering
  Posted 5 days ago with 41 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: