It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

[HOAX]Found New Video- large Space Objects-F.A.S.T. [HOAX]

page: 13
20
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 07:19 AM
link   
I remixed this video using invert contrast brightness and gamma to try to make the images clearer. It's the location video, also people still making statements that they have been told nothing, THIS IS A LOCATION.


Rocket Man





posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 07:34 AM
link   
Although I've generally stopped posting in threads which promise everything and deliver nothing... I just wanted to say nice music, I feel warm and fuzzy



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 08:20 AM
link   
Thanks, it's a personal tribute to John. (not myself lol)



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 01:38 PM
link   
Hello again John Lenard (gridkeeper). I've just found a statement
you made in other forum and it attracted my attention what you
said at the beguinning wich I will quote here for everyone.

Re: F-A-S-T - Far Above Space and Time.
« Reply #21 on Oct 17, 2007, 8:41pm »

Jose Escamilla said he would give me a share of five million pounds, can prove it and will, fact.

JLW.

GK.

If this is true John (gridkeeper) I'm sorry to say this but you are
extremely dumb my friend. How in the world would anybody belive
is gonna be paid a share of Five Million Pounds for a bunch of videos ?
There's no producer or director or tv network in the whole world that
would pay even remotely such amount of money for a story.

Not even in the movie industry unless you are a superstar and those
are real facts buddy. What's wrong with you ?

Now I see things very clear and understand your frustration and
motives for posting indiscriminately so many of your videos all
over the forums. You said Jose Escamilla did'nt pay you so in
retaliation you are now releasing your collection for free.

I should ask you John: Why did'nt you release all those videos before
for free ? Why did you wait to be paid that five million pounds share
as condition to release your materials to the world ? For money ?
Well I can understand Mr. Lenard. Unfortunately your ambition
betrayed you and at the end you got nothing.

My condolences



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:25 PM
link   
reply to post by free_spirit
 


If Jose offered John a deal than that's their business not mine. You've just discredited yourself bigtime and you've done it all by yourself.

You have a picture of John.

You know what he sounds like.

I speak on many of my youtube videos, I am even in one some of them.


For the record when I INDENDANTLY approached the tv company we never once discussed money.

Also do the right thing and post the link to that quote.

Gridkeeper.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:25 PM
link   


It's not a comet.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Gridkeeper
 




give this post a star
posted on 26uMonday07/27/20 @ 03:25 single this post "quote"REPLY TO:


YouTube Link


" It's not a comet ".

Yes your correct it's another white blob in the dark!

How exciting



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 04:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Gridkeeper
 


Hard to tell what it is.


I like the videos of the galactic spaceships a lot better. Those things are huge!



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Monsterenergy791
reply to post by Gridkeeper
 


Hard to tell what it is.


I like the videos of the galactic spaceships a lot better. Those things are huge!


galactic spaceships? Please tell me how you came to this conclusion?

I see no evidence in any of these videos to suggest what I'm seeing are galactic spaceships?

I see blurry out of focus smudges which could be a million different things.

Don't you think we would already have disclosure if these were galactic spaceships?



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 05:59 PM
link   
I see someone who is still visiting this site after 13 pages who is secretly impressed by these videos but will not admit it.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 06:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Monsterenergy791
 



Yes I would agree with you I like the ones with the galactic spaceships too, in fact I can't think of anything better than seeing a galactic spaceship, sometimes just one galactic spaceship isn't enough for me.

So hey I don't care what you call them and personaly I just like to see them.

Now as a general comment I would like to post this image.




Source

As you can see it is pretty crowded up there, LEO Satellites (green) and Debris Ring (red), so it does not take a lot of imagination to believe that if you point a telescope at a point of light in the night sky you are probably going to see something.

Here is the problem as I see it, when you do see something what are you looking at ?

What you would need is kinda like an observers book of satellites and space junk, or perhaps a Janes book of satellites, I wonder if there is one of those ?, jra where are you ?

So in conclusion sure you can call them galactic spaceships and I don't mind a bit but until you can positively discount everything else up there I would just say "whisky tango foxtrot is that".


And here is an image of the ISS taken by an amateur astronomer, for which I apologise in advance for not having the link to the source to hand for.





posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 07:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by sherpa
And here is an image of the ISS taken by an amateur astronomer, for which I apologise in advance for not having the link to the source to hand for.

Sherpa, here are the credits for the image that you've posted:


Martin Fiedler - International Space Station ISS
www.astronomycameras.com...
www.astronomycameras.com...

www.astronomycameras.com...



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 07:39 PM
link   
reply to post by internos
 


Thanks internos, you know the speed at which you find things and post them makes my eyes water.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 05:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Cyber_Wasp
I see someone who is still visiting this site after 13 pages who is secretly impressed by these videos but will not admit it.


I'll be impressed when somebody tells me what they are.

Am I supposed to believe they're Galactic space ships without proof?

Shall I go to the pub and tell all my friends that I've found some videos of Galactic space ships flying through space?

What do you think would happen?

Everybody would laugh at me and ridicule me and I'd probably have no friends left.

Galactic spaceships
This thread gets more ridiculous as it progresses.



posted on Nov, 28 2007 @ 05:28 PM
link   
Comet Holmes Is Not Alone




posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 01:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gridkeeper
Comet Holmes Is Not Alone



No but you are



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 03:10 PM
link   
For those of you interested in these comet videos, I just got banned from the godlikeproductions forum, that includes opening any cached pages, a complete block. And no free_spirit it had nothing to do with spaming at all. These are two new ones uploaded today.
Comet Holmes and large UFO space objects ( compilation )


Comet Holmes UFO Related Flash colour analyse ( Remix )



posted on Nov, 30 2007 @ 05:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gridkeeper
For those of you interested in these comet videos, I just got banned from the godlikeproductions forum, that includes opening any cached pages, a complete block. And no free_spirit it had nothing to do with spaming at all. These are two new ones uploaded today.
Comet Holmes and large UFO space objects ( compilation )


I watched these two videos gridkeeper a.k.a. John Lenard Walson.
Unfortunately you made again a new hoax by inserting an image of
one of those alleged spaceships into the alleged comet Homes videos
like a cheap subliminal spam advertisement wich results inadmissible.

It's clear your determination to sell your ufo/alien story now using the
Comet Holmes event. These are the evidences.

In this comparison I made, the image captured from your posted video
is in fact one of those alleged spaceships from space but inverted as
you can see in the analysis. On the top is the original and at the bottom
is the inverted one. The first part of the insert you darkened the image
so the object could not be recognized, you pretended to camouflage
the object. But then you inserted the same one inverted and the whole
process was revealed. A hoax by inserting these images into the alleged
comet ones. Why ? To deceive people making them belive this is the
ufo next to the comet Holmes. You sould be ashamed of yourself.

Check this comparison with a very similar object also by John Lenard
but from a different date. What a coincidence right ?




Now, on the issue of the Comet Holmes images given the past results
then the whole videos are highly questionable. Why should we belive
these videos indeed present the comet Holmes and not some post
lamps from the street recorded with a moving camera ? If you did'nt
have any reservation to insert a different image not related to the
alleged comet Holmes sequence, mixing both videos to sustain your
story why should we belive any of it ?

The evidences are clear and definitive. You mixed two different videos
into one alone. You see why you have been banned from other forums.
By making subliminal spam in a video you are commiting foulplay.
This is the definition of subliminal by Wikipedia.

A subliminal message is a signal or message embedded in another object,
designed to pass below the normal limits of perception. These messages
are indiscernible by the conscious mind, but allegedly affect the
subconscious or deeper mind. Subliminal techniques have occasionally
been used in advertising and propaganda; the purpose, effectiveness and
frequency of such techniques is debated.

And now: Debunking your "Comet Holmes is not alone" ufo story.

This is the information provided by NASA about Comet Holmes that
explain those issues.

antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov...

EXPLANATION: Why did Comet HOLMES brighten? The unexpectedly bright
Comet 17P/Holmes continues to grace northern skies as a naked-eye
addition to the constellation Perseus. What is seen, however, is
primarily the sunlight-reflecting dust coma. It surrounds an iceberg
nucleus too small and too faint to discern. Clues to the nearly
million-fold brightness increase are therefore being sought in dramatic
images of the enigmatic comet's central regions taken earlier this
month. One such Hubble image, shown BELOW, indicates a still unresolved
dense central dust cloud near the nucleus, surrounded by a more complex,
anisotropic coma. Observers around and above the world will continue to
study this unusual addition to the night sky.

And this is the explanation to the alleged spaceship or UFO craft
that gridkeeper a.k.a. John Lenard Walson is trying to sell.

www.yubanet.com...

By: SpaceWeather.com
Published: Nov 19, 2007 at 07:26

Comet 17P/Holmes is swallowing a star! Not really, but it looks that way.
Tonight, Comet Holmes is passing directly in front of Mirfak, the brightest
star of the constellation Perseus.

These are facts not illusions. You are served sir.



posted on Dec, 1 2007 @ 03:24 PM
link   
Believe Nasa? Now that's funny. What you have said is insane and I think you know it. Let's get one thing straight before you decided to throw more accusations into the game. You have made many accusations in the past which you have made no real effort to prove. Now you are making things up which don't even make sense, for instance the two pictures you used as a comparison are two different objects altogether and that is clear to see. Also the colour looks the same because the contrast has been adjusted, do you understand what that means? Do you even grasp or actually understand subliminal? I don't think so.

So you know what John Lenard Walson looks like. There are people who write on this forum that know what I look like. There is a picture of me on the front page of my youtube account. www.youtube.com... Have a very CLOSE look. It is you who will be proven to be wrong on all counts, but in the mean time carry on, you are doing a marvelous job.

Gridkeeper (not John Lenard Walson).



posted on Dec, 1 2007 @ 07:59 PM
link   
here's a nice video.



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join