Originally posted by piacenza

Almost every single video of the 2nd plane hitting the building was not shot live.

Not shot live? How then were those videos recorded? ... from rooftops, the ground, news helicopters, etc. LIVE.

Because the angle and or vantage point from which a video was recorded doesn't show the actual plane before impact means What?

... simply that it was obscured from sight due to said angle and or vantage point, IMO.

Of course, your mileage may vary.


 

I remember watching that day. I had just gotten off shift. They were showing the fist tower burning, when the second plane flew into the building. No cut aways, no black outs, just a clear shot of the plane flying into the building. I remember this because I recognized what had just happened , and nothing was being said about it on the news channel. Which I found weird. It was like it took them a minute or two to relize what had happened.

And what about the videos shot from the park, across the river, etc. All showing quite clearly a plane, identifiable as a United Airlines 767, hitting the building. Were those all CGI or faked too?