It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

14 camera views and only one plane hit.

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 15 2007 @ 10:32 PM
link   
This is not concerning the plane or no plane theory, what I wish to discuss more in depth is the switch of camera views at the moment of impact.
After watching this video, ask yourself if this could have been a coincidence.
Almost every single video of the 2nd plane hitting the building was not shot live. It might be a coincidence but I think this is at least odd. This (for me) shows a controlled event where the Medias and govt had an active part. Now was there a plane (I doubt)? Was it a military plane (maybe)? Was it only a coincidence (almost impossible)?






posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 06:23 AM
link   
reply to post by piacenza
 


This video is pure trash. The music, the cute little score keeping ring tone. Pathetic, making a mockery of the deaths of those involved. No offense to you piacenza, but this video is a disgrace.



posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 06:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by piacenza

Almost every single video of the 2nd plane hitting the building was not shot live.


Not shot live? How then were those videos recorded? ... from rooftops, the ground, news helicopters, etc. LIVE.

Because the angle and or vantage point from which a video was recorded doesn't show the actual plane before impact means What?

... simply that it was obscured from sight due to said angle and or vantage point, IMO.

Of course, your mileage may vary.


 


six

posted on Sep, 18 2007 @ 07:47 AM
link   
I remember watching that day. I had just gotten off shift. They were showing the fist tower burning, when the second plane flew into the building. No cut aways, no black outs, just a clear shot of the plane flying into the building. I remember this because I recognized what had just happened , and nothing was being said about it on the news channel. Which I found weird. It was like it took them a minute or two to relize what had happened.



posted on Sep, 18 2007 @ 07:53 AM
link   
And what about the videos shot from the park, across the river, etc. All showing quite clearly a plane, identifiable as a United Airlines 767, hitting the building. Were those all CGI or faked too?



posted on Sep, 18 2007 @ 08:14 AM
link   
you can watch the impacts on all the major networks here, and amazingly all of these videos show plane+explosion+impact.
www.archive.org...

sorry, but debunked.




top topics
 
0

log in

join