posted on Sep, 15 2007 @ 06:35 PM
I have read many of the Twin tower conspiricy theorys over the past few weeks, and it seems to me that they are becoming more and more complex in
design. Cruise missiles, holographs and building implosions have cited for the collapse of the towers.
Would it not be more logical to assume that two aircraft were overtaken by individuals an flown into the Twin towers. A fire with very intense heat
combined with time and strucural damage led to the collapse of both towers.
This is not to say that the U.S. government was or was not involved.
If it was cruise missiles why did they hit in different locations on each tower? My understanding of cruise missile guidance systems is that they are
If it was a holographic image of planes hitting the towers it would require people to program and then generate images of aircraft hitting the towers,
two airline aircraft to be hidden or destroyed somewhere else and the passengers on board to be relocated or exicuted by other individuals. This would
require that a lot of people would be involved in the coordination of such an effort.
A building implosion would also require many people to pull it off. Plus the above mentioned requirements for planes and passegers.
The more complex the theory, the more people involved. The more people involved, the harder it is to keep the secret. So why make it more complex then
it needs to be?