It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mr. Mir, the only reporter to interview bin Laden in the wake of 9/11, said that the text of bin Laden's address may have been redacted by government sources since a significant portion of it was not aired by major American news outlets.
In the unaltered message, according to Mr. Mir, bin Laden says: "We must sacrifice our lives to attack the enemy." This statement, Mr. Mir points out, is a call for suicide attacks to take place throughout the United States - - a call that was erased from official transcripts of the videotape.
Mr. Mir said that he had been informed by leaders of the Taliban in Afghanistan that al Qaeda's long-planned American Hiroshima - - a nuclear attack on seven to ten U.S. cities - - will occur in 2008 but could come sooner.
They are waiting for the proper time. They want the U.S. to be involved in a mass killing of Muslims, so that they will have some justification.
Originally posted by GideonHM
Originally posted by GideonHM
I mean, if you believe in non-terrestrial beings who have been showing interest in Earth's development at all,
or in that there could be a powerful organization affecting the movement of this planet's governments, don't you think that this nuclear holocaust in the name of Islam would counter some resistance? Look at this from the perspective of the Illuminati, do you honestly think that they would allow all their centuries of control and manipulation to end in a bright flash of nuclear winter?
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
If such special interests are actually in play, dont you think they would have stopped, or at least interfered with, the development of such devices as the A bomb, the H bomb, and the Nutron bomb?
Would it not stand to reason, that if we create and test these devices, that we intent to use them?
I believe we are visited, but i believe they will do nothing but observe.
In answer to that, I firmly agree that observation and allowing our civilization to develop (including all of our mistakes), is the first and foremost goal of these peoples. However, making a stupid weapon or even stealing one is not the same as using it. Yes, I agree that if I were in their position, I would take more immediate steps to insure that the possibility of these weapons didn't happen, and I would have done everything in my power to keep them from ever being as much as a threat as they are. However, I feel that coming from the perspective of strict non-interventionism, if a focus group (us for instance) allows (even by just not stopping them) their governments to build weapons of mass destruction, or others to steal them, then they will just have to live under the shadow of thermonuclear war, and until someone truly stupid pushes the red button, they will do nothing, and even then it is an extremely small matter of making sure the button just doesn't work without revealing one little thing about themselves. Of course this is highly speculative, but I do believe that this idea deserves at least some contemplation time, no matter what you decide on, as long as you make up your own mind on the matter (not that I am saying you are not). Also, I think that as long as someone is willing to intelligently and in a friendly manner discuss topics presented (which you are), opinions are very valuable and can give incredible insight into many matters and issues, no matter how unlikely or controversial they may be.
[edit on 19-9-2007 by GideonHM]
Originally posted by GideonHM
Could you please restate what you said? I just don't understand what you are trying to say or to whom you are speaking.
Originally posted by antar
As for alien intervention, we are not even close, not for 8-10- decades, that is if we survive that long.